Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of Social Media Use on Discussion Network Heterogeneity and Civic Engagement: The Moderating Role of Personality Traits: Social Media & Personality Traits

Kim, Yonghwan, Hsu, Shih-Hsien, de Zúñiga, Homero Gil·2013·Journal of Communication
DOI 10.1111/jcom.12034
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Using original national survey data, we examine how social media use affects individuals' discussion network heterogeneity and their level of civic engagement. We also investigate the moderating role of personality traits (i.e., extraversion and openness to experiences) in this association. Results support the notion that use of social media contributes to heterogeneity of discussion networks and activities in civic life. More importantly, personality traits such as extraversion and openness to experiences were found to moderate the influence of social media on discussion network heterogeneity and civic participation, indicating that the contributing role of social media in increasing network heterogeneity and civic engagement is greater for introverted and less open individuals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcom.12034

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Althaus, 2000, Patterns of Internet and traditional news media use in a networked community, Political Communication, 17, 21, 10.1080/105846000198495 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Baum, 2008, New media and the polarization of American political discourse, Political Communication, 25, 345, 10.1080/10584600802426965 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bekkers, 2005, Participation in voluntary associations: Relations with resources, personality, and political values, Political Psychology, 26, 439, 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00425.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bennett, 2008, A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication, Journal of Communication, 58, 707, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bimber, 1999, The Internet and citizen communication with government: Does the medium matter?, Political Communication, 16, 409, 10.1080/105846099198569 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Brundidge, 2010, Encountering “difference” in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the Internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks, Journal of Communication, 60, 680, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01509.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. Brundidge , J., Rice , R. E. 2009 Political engagement online: Do the information rich get richer and the like-minded more similar? A. Chadwick P. N. Howard The handbook of internet politics 144 156 New York, NY Routledge
  8. Delli Carpini, 2004, Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature, Annual Reviews of Political Science, 7, 315, 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Elshaug, 2001, Personality attributes of volunteers and paid workers engaged in similar occupational tasks, Journal of Social Psychology, 752-763
  10. Eysenck, 1967, The biological basis of personality
  11. Garrett, 2009b, Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate, Journal of Communication, 59, 676, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gil de Zúñiga, 2009, Journalism and citizenship, 108
  13. Gil de Zúñiga, 2012, Social media use for news and Individuals' social capital, civic engagement and political participation, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. Gil de Zúñiga, 2011, The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties and civic engagement, Communication Research, 38, 397, 10.1177/0093650210384984 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Holbert, 2010, A new era of minimal effects? A response to Bennett and Iyengar, Journal of Communication, 60, 15, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01470.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. Huckfeldt, 1995, Political environments, cohesive social groups, and the communication of public opinion, American Journal of Political Science, 39, 1025, 10.2307/2111668 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Jung, 2011, The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation, Mass Communication and Society, 14, 407, 10.1080/15205436.2010.496135 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Katz, 2002, Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction, 10.7551/mitpress/6292.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Kavanaugh, 2005, Community networks: Where offline communities meet online, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00266.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kenski, 2006, Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 173, 10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kim, 2011, The contribution of social network sites to exposure to political difference: The relationships among SNSs, online political messaging, and exposure to cross-cutting perspectives, Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 971, 10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Kim, 2011b, Understanding j-blog adoption: Factors influencing Korean journalists' blog adoption, Asian Journal of Communication, 21, 25, 10.1080/01292986.2010.524229 · DOI
  23. Klapper, 1960, The effects of mass communication
  24. Krueger, 2006, A comparison of conventional and Internet political mobilization, American Politics Research, 34, 759, 10.1177/1532673X06290911 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Lambe, 2009, Public attitudes about government involvement in expressive controversies, Journal of Communication, 59, 225, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01413.x · DOI
  26. Leighley, 1990, Social interaction and contextual influences on political participation, American Politics Research, 18, 459, 10.1177/1532673X9001800404 · DOI · Paper page
  27. McCrae, 1996, Social consequences of experiential openness, Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323, 10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.323 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.323 · Paper page
  28. McLeod, 1999, Understanding deliberation: The effects of discussion networks on participation in a public forum, Communication Research, 26, 623, 10.1177/009365099026006005 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Mondak, 2000, Personality and civic engagement: An integrative framework for the study of trait effects on political behavior, American Political Science Review, 104, 85, 10.1017/S0003055409990359 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Moy, 2005, Linking dimensions of Internet use and civic engagement, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 82, 571, 10.1177/107769900508200306 · DOI
  31. Mutz, 2006a, Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy, 10.1017/CBO9780511617201 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Mutz, 2006b, Red and blue nation? Characteristics and causes of America's polarized politics
  33. Norris, 2000, A virtuous circle, 10.1017/CBO9780511609343 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Price, 2002, Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion?, Political Communication, 19, 95, 10.1080/105846002317246506 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Putnam, 2000, Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community
  36. Scheufele, 2006, Democracy based on difference: Examining the links between structural heterogeneity, heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship, Journal of Communication, 56, 728, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00317.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. Sears, 1967, Selective exposure to information: A critical review, Public Opinion Quarterly, 31, 194, 10.1086/267513 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Shah, 2005, Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation, Communication Research, 32, 531, 10.1177/0093650205279209 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Shirky, 2008, Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations
  40. Stroud, 2007, Media effects, selective exposure, and Fahrenheit 9/11, Political Communication, 24, 415, 10.1080/10584600701641565 · DOI
  41. Sunstein, 2001, Republic.com
  42. Verba, 1995, Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics, 10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Wojcieszak, 2009, Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement?, Journal of Communication, 59, 40, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x · DOI · Paper page
  44. Zhang, 2010, The revolution will be networked: The influence of social networking sites on political attitudes and behavior, Social Science Computer Review, 28, 75, 10.1177/0894439309335162 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Zhao, 2008, Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships, Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1816, 10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 318

Metadata

Authors
Kim, Y., Hsu, S.-H., & de Zúñiga, H. G.
Venue
Journal of Communication
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2013-05-11
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
498-516
ISSN
0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1111/jcom.12034
OpenAlex
W2167362892
Cited by
318
References
12
FWCI
55.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 843 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.