Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 395

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Mediating Path to a Stronger Citizenship: Online and Offline Networks, Weak Ties, and Civic Engagement

Gil de Zúñiga, Homero, Valenzuela, Sebastián·2011·Communication Research

Abstract

Empirical studies of citizen communication networks and participation go as far back as the 1940s, with a bolder focus in political—not civic—activities. A consistent finding reveals that individuals with larger networks are more engaged than those with smaller networks. This article expands this line of work with a number of novel tests. First, it compares the predictive power of online versus offline network size on civic engagement. It then explores the role of strong-tie versus weak-tie discussion frequency and participatory behaviors. Finally, it examines the extent to which the contribution of network size, both online and offline, on civic engagement is mediated by discussion with weak ties. Using original survey data from a large national sample of U.S. adults, results indicate that (1) the relationships between online and offline network size and civic engagement are positive and fairly similar in strength, (2) weak-tie discussion is the strongest predictor of civic behaviors, (3) weak-tie discussion largely mediates the association between participation and network size online and offline, and (4) online networks entail greater exposure to weak ties than offline networks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0093650210384984

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. American Association of Public Opinion Research., 2008, Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys
  2. Bachmann, I., 2010, International Journal of Internet Science, 5, 34
  3. 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141922 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bennett, W.L. ( 2008). Changing citizenship in the digital age. In W. L. Bennett (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 1-24). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Berger, C.R. ( 2009). Interpersonal communication. In D. W. Stacks & M. B. Salwen (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 260-279). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  6. 10.4159/9780674029088 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Campbell, D.E., 2006, Why we vote: How schools and communities shape our civic life
  8. 10.2307/1959141 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1086/228943 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Delli Carpini, M.X., 1996, What Americans know about politics and why it matters
  12. Enns, S., Malinick, T. & Matthews, R. ( 2008). It’s not only who you know, it’s also where they are: Using the position generator to investigate the structure of access to embedded resources. In N. Lin & B. H. Erickson (Eds.), Social capital: An international research program (pp. 255-307). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  13. 10.1177/009365001028005001 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1080/10584600490443877 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1080/105846099198749 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M. & Signorielli, N. (1994). Growing up with television: The cultivation perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 17-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  18. Gil de Zúñiga, H., 2007, Webology, 3
  19. Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2009). Blogs, journalism and political participation. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.) Journalism and citizenship: New agendas (pp. 108-123). New York, NY : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  20. 10.1177/1461444809102960 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Gil de Zúñiga, H., 2010, Comunicación y Ciudadanía, 2, 60
  22. 10.1080/19331680903316742 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Gil de Zúñiga, H. & Valenzuela , S. (2010). "Who uses Facebook and why". In Wittkower, D. (Eds.) Facebook and Philosophy: What’s on your Mind? (pp. XXXI-XXXVII). Chicago: Open Court Publishing.
  24. Gilbert, D., 1998, The handbook of social psychology
  25. Göritz, A.S., Reinhold, N. & Batinic, B. ( 2002). Online panels. In B. Batinic, U.D. Reips, M. Bosnjak & A. Werner (Eds.), Online social sciences (pp. 27-47). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe.
  26. 10.1086/225469 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1235 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1098/rstb.2004.1522 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Hill, K.A., 1998, Cyberpolitics: Citizen activism in the age of the Internet
  31. 10.1207/s15506878jobem4904_4 · DOI
  32. 10.2307/2111668 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Katz, E., 1955, Personal influence
  34. Kaufhold, K., 2010, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87, 515, 10.1177/107769901008700305 · DOI
  35. Kavanaugh, A., 2005, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10
  36. Kavanaugh, A. & Patterson, S. ( 2002). The impact of computer networks on social capital and community involvement. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 325-344). Oxford, UK: Blackwell . · doi:10.1002/9780470774298.ch11
  37. 10.1080/01972240590925320 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Keller, E., 2003, The influentials
  39. 10.2307/2132189 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/105846099198541 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1177/1065912907301708 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/0162-895X.00118 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Lazarsfeld, P., 1948, The people’s choice
  44. 10.1002/9780470774298.ch14 · DOI
  45. 10.1177/009365099026006005 · DOI
  46. McLeod, J.M., Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication
  47. 10.1177/000312240607100301 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.2307/1959140 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.2307/1959142 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1017/CBO9780511617201 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1017/S0007123499000289 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Nie, N.H., 1996, Education and democratic citizenship in America
  53. 10.1017/CBO9780511609343 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Pew Internet & American Life Project., 2009, About our survey methodology in detail
  55. Putnam, R.D., 1996, American Prospect, 24, 34
  56. 10.1177/0093650208315977 · DOI
  57. 10.1207/s15327825mcs0802_2 · DOI
  58. Schmitt-Beck, R., 2004, Theories, Cases and Challenges. In Frank Esser and Barbara Pfetsch
  59. Scott, J., 1991, Social network analysis: A handbook
  60. 10.1177/0093650205279209 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1080/105846001750322952 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Smith, A., 2009, The internet and civic engagement
  63. 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.12.004 · DOI
  64. 10.1111/0162-895X.00113 · DOI
  65. 10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.2307/2110843 · DOI
  67. Wellman, B. ( 1982). Studying personal communities. In P. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 61-80). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
  68. Wellman, B. ( 1997). An electronic group is virtually a social network. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 179-205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  69. 10.1177/00027640121957286 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183177.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 395

Metadata

Authors
Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Valenzuela, S.
Venue
Communication Research
Published
2010-12-08
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
397-421
ISSN
  • 0093-6502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3810
OpenAlex
W2129285862
Cited by
395
References
9
FWCI
49.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Mediating Path to a Stronger Citizenship: Online and Offline Networks, Weak Ties, and Civic Engagement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0093650210384984
The paper
Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Valenzuela, S. (2011). The Mediating Path to a Stronger Citizenship: Online and Offline Networks, Weak Ties, and Civic Engagement. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210384984

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.