The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Mediating Path to a Stronger Citizenship: Online and Offline Networks, Weak Ties, and Civic Engagement
Abstract
Empirical studies of citizen communication networks and participation go as far back as the 1940s, with a bolder focus in political—not civic—activities. A consistent finding reveals that individuals with larger networks are more engaged than those with smaller networks. This article expands this line of work with a number of novel tests. First, it compares the predictive power of online versus offline network size on civic engagement. It then explores the role of strong-tie versus weak-tie discussion frequency and participatory behaviors. Finally, it examines the extent to which the contribution of network size, both online and offline, on civic engagement is mediated by discussion with weak ties. Using original survey data from a large national sample of U.S. adults, results indicate that (1) the relationships between online and offline network size and civic engagement are positive and fairly similar in strength, (2) weak-tie discussion is the strongest predictor of civic behaviors, (3) weak-tie discussion largely mediates the association between participation and network size online and offline, and (4) online networks entail greater exposure to weak ties than offline networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x · Cited by 9,939
Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.53.9.1017 · Cited by 4,793
Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x · Cited by 2,229
Self-citationRed Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use
Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x · Cited by 1,940
Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use
Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003 · Cited by 1,915
Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_17 · Cited by 1,866
Assessing Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys
Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1023/a:1024232915870 · Cited by 1,294
Research works printed but not linked: 70
- American Association of Public Opinion Research., 2008, Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys
- Bachmann, I., 2010, International Journal of Internet Science, 5, 34
- 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141922 · DOI · Paper page
- Bennett, W.L. ( 2008). Changing citizenship in the digital age. In W. L. Bennett (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 1-24). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press. · DOI · Paper page
- Berger, C.R. ( 2009). Interpersonal communication. In D. W. Stacks & M. B. Salwen (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 260-279). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- 10.4159/9780674029088 · DOI · Paper page
- Campbell, D.E., 2006, Why we vote: How schools and communities shape our civic life
- 10.2307/1959141 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/228943 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630 · DOI · Paper page
- Delli Carpini, M.X., 1996, What Americans know about politics and why it matters
- Enns, S., Malinick, T. & Matthews, R. ( 2008). It’s not only who you know, it’s also where they are: Using the position generator to investigate the structure of access to embedded resources. In N. Lin & B. H. Erickson (Eds.), Social capital: An international research program (pp. 255-307). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. · DOI
- 10.1177/009365001028005001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/10584600490443877 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/105846099198749 · DOI · Paper page
- Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M. & Signorielli, N. (1994). Growing up with television: The cultivation perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 17-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Gil de Zúñiga, H., 2007, Webology, 3
- Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2009). Blogs, journalism and political participation. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.) Journalism and citizenship: New agendas (pp. 108-123). New York, NY : Lawrence Erlbaum.
- 10.1177/1461444809102960 · DOI · Paper page
- Gil de Zúñiga, H., 2010, Comunicación y Ciudadanía, 2, 60
- 10.1080/19331680903316742 · DOI · Paper page
- Gil de Zúñiga, H. & Valenzuela , S. (2010). "Who uses Facebook and why". In Wittkower, D. (Eds.) Facebook and Philosophy: What’s on your Mind? (pp. XXXI-XXXVII). Chicago: Open Court Publishing.
- Gilbert, D., 1998, The handbook of social psychology
- Göritz, A.S., Reinhold, N. & Batinic, B. ( 2002). Online panels. In B. Batinic, U.D. Reips, M. Bosnjak & A. Werner (Eds.), Online social sciences (pp. 27-47). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe.
- 10.1086/225469 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1235 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rstb.2004.1522 · DOI · Paper page
- Hill, K.A., 1998, Cyberpolitics: Citizen activism in the age of the Internet
- 10.1207/s15506878jobem4904_4 · DOI
- 10.2307/2111668 · DOI · Paper page
- Katz, E., 1955, Personal influence
- Kaufhold, K., 2010, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87, 515, 10.1177/107769901008700305 · DOI
- Kavanaugh, A., 2005, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10
- Kavanaugh, A. & Patterson, S. ( 2002). The impact of computer networks on social capital and community involvement. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 325-344). Oxford, UK: Blackwell . · doi:10.1002/9780470774298.ch11
- 10.1080/01972240590925320 · DOI · Paper page
- Keller, E., 2003, The influentials
- 10.2307/2132189 · DOI
- 10.1080/105846099198541 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1065912907301708 · DOI
- 10.1111/0162-895X.00118 · DOI · Paper page
- Lazarsfeld, P., 1948, The people’s choice
- 10.1002/9780470774298.ch14 · DOI
- 10.1177/009365099026006005 · DOI
- McLeod, J.M., Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication
- 10.1177/000312240607100301 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1959140 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1959142 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511617201 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0007123499000289 · DOI · Paper page
- Nie, N.H., 1996, Education and democratic citizenship in America
- 10.1017/CBO9780511609343 · DOI · Paper page
- Pew Internet & American Life Project., 2009, About our survey methodology in detail
- Putnam, R.D., 1996, American Prospect, 24, 34
- 10.1177/0093650208315977 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327825mcs0802_2 · DOI
- Schmitt-Beck, R., 2004, Theories, Cases and Challenges. In Frank Esser and Barbara Pfetsch
- Scott, J., 1991, Social network analysis: A handbook
- 10.1177/0093650205279209 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/105846001750322952 · DOI · Paper page
- Smith, A., 2009, The internet and civic engagement
- 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1111/0162-895X.00113 · DOI
- 10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2110843 · DOI
- Wellman, B. ( 1982). Studying personal communities. In P. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 61-80). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
- Wellman, B. ( 1997). An electronic group is virtually a social network. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 179-205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- 10.1177/00027640121957286 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183177.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x · Cited by 1,821
Self-citationModeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks
Baumann, F., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Sokolov, I. M., & Starnini, M. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.048301 · Cited by 427
Third person effects of fake news: Fake news regulation and media literacy interventions
Jang, S. M., & Kim, J. K. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.034 · Cited by 414
Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization
Barberá, P. (2020) · Social Media and Democracy · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.004 · Cited by 373
A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy
Lorenz-Spreen, P., Oswald, L., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Valenzuela, S.
- Venue
- Communication Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-12-08
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 397-421
- ISSN
- 0093-6502 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3810
- OpenAlex
- W2129285862
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 49.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Mediating Path to a Stronger Citizenship: Online and Offline Networks, Weak Ties, and Civic Engagement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0093650210384984
- The paper
- Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Valenzuela, S. (2011). The Mediating Path to a Stronger Citizenship: Online and Offline Networks, Weak Ties, and Civic Engagement. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210384984
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.