Cited by 244Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderCognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

A randomized clinical trial of Cogmed Working Memory Training in school‐age children with ADHD : a replication in a diverse sample using a control condition

Open access
Chacko, A., Bedard, A.C., Marks, D.J., Feirsen, N., Uderman, J.Z., Chimiklis, A., Rajwan, E., Cornwell, M. +3 more·2014·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Cogmed Working Memory Training ( CWMT ) has received considerable attention as a promising intervention for the treatment of Attention‐Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ( ADHD ) in children. At the same time, methodological weaknesses in previous clinical trials call into question reported efficacy of CWMT . In particular, lack of equivalence in key aspects of CWMT (i.e., contingent reinforcement, time‐on‐task with computer training, parent–child interactions, supportive coaching) between CWMT and placebo versions of CWMT used in previous trials may account for the beneficial outcomes favoring CWMT . Methods: Eighty‐five 7‐ to 11‐year old school‐age children with ADHD (66 male; 78%) were randomized to either standard CWMT ( CWMT Active) or a well‐controlled CWMT placebo condition ( CWMT Placebo) and evaluated before and 3 weeks after treatment. Dependent measures included parent and teacher ratings of ADHD symptoms; objective measures of attention, activity level, and impulsivity; and psychometric indices of working memory and academic achievement (Clinical trial title: Combined cognitive remediation and behavioral intervention for the treatment of Attention‐Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01137318 ). Results: CWMT Active participants demonstrated significantly greater improvements in verbal and nonverbal working memory storage, but evidenced no discernible gains in working memory storage plus processing/manipulation. In addition, no treatment group differences were observed for any other outcome measures. Conclusions: When a more rigorous comparison condition is utilized, CWMT demonstrates effects on certain aspects of working memory in children with ADHD ; however, CWMT does not appear to foster treatment generalization to other domains of functioning. As such, CWMT should not be considered a viable treatment for children with ADHD .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.12146

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In many ways our findings are similar to those of previous placebo controlled (single) EF training studies in children with ADHD (but only one of these studies corrected for multiple testing).

    “In many ways our findings are similar to those of previous placebo controlled (single) EF training studies in children with ADHD [21], [84], [85], [86], [23] (but note that only one of these studies [21] corrected for multiple testing).”
  • The present results show considerable cognitive and neural plasticity in children suffering from ADHD, indicating that individual benefits of well-tailored cognitive interventions may be considerable.

    “The present results nonetheless show considerable cognitive and neural plasticity in children suffering from ADHD (Jolles and Crone, 2012; Rapport et al., 2013; Chacko et al., 2014), indicating that the individual benefits of well-tailored cognitive interventions may be considerable.”

    From Executive control training from middle childhood to adolescence (2014) · cites this paper as Chacko et al., 2014

  • Recent reviews and meta-analyses suggest that the effects of working memory training in children with ADHD may not be that far reaching.

    “Despite these and other encouraging findings, recent reviews and meta-analyses suggest that the effects of working memory training in children with ADHD may not be that far reaching (Rapport et al., 2013; Chacko et al., 2014).”

    From Executive control training from middle childhood to adolescence (2014) · cites this paper as Chacko et al., 2014

  • A well-controlled recent study on the effects of CogMed training in 7- to 11-year-old children with ADHD did not show beneficial effects beyond working memory improvements.

    “In fact, a well-controlled recent study on the effects of CogMed training in 7- to 11-year-old children with ADHD did not show beneficial effects beyond working memory improvements (Chacko et al., 2014; see also Holmes et al., 2009b).”

    From Executive control training from middle childhood to adolescence (2014) · cites this paper as Chacko et al., 2014

  • Computerized training programs for ADHD show some evidence for short-term effects on targeted working memory outcomes as measured by neurocognitive tests similar to the ones practiced in the games, but have not shown compelling evidence that these effects generalize beyond neurocognitive outcomes to important domains of daily life functioning.

    “Although these programs show some evidence for short-term effects on targeted working memory outcomes as measured by neurocognitive tests similar to the ones practiced in the games, they have not shown compelling evidence that these effects generalize beyond neurocognitive outcomes to important domains of functioning in the daily lives of children with ADHD (so-called “far-transfer effects”) [27-”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Alloway TP 2007 Automated working memory assessment Oxford Harcourt
  2. Fabiano GA Pelham WE Gnagy EM Kipp H Lahey BB Burrows-MacLean L Chronis AM 2006 The reliability and validity of the Children’s Impairment rating Scale: A practical measure of impairment in children with ADHD Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 35 369 385 16836475

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chacko, A., Bedard, A. C., Marks, D. J., Feirsen, N., Uderman, J. Z., Chimiklis, A., Rajwan, E., Cornwell, M., Anderson, L., Zwilling, A., & Ramon, M.
Affiliations
  • Queens College, CUNY (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
  • Department of Psychology Queens College City University of New York Flushing NY USA
Corresponding author
Chacko, A.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10-07
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
247-255
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W1979335377
Cited by
244
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 1
FWCI
15.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH088845)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, ADHD treatment, working memory, placebo-controlled intervention, cognitive remediation, elementary school students, treatment generalization, impulsivity, academic performance
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Placebos, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review