Cited by 53Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Updating and working memory training: Immediate improvement, long-term maintenance, and generalisability to non-trained tasks

Ang, Su Yin, Lee, Kerry, Cheam, Fiona, Poon, Kenneth, Koh, Juliana·2015·Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Abstract

Despite the popularity of working memory (WM) and updating training, recent reviews have questioned their efficacy. We evaluated a computer-based training programme based on the Running Span and Keep Track paradigms. We assigned 111 7-year-olds with poor WM and mathematical performances to updating training, one of two control groups, or a fourth group, who were administered Cogmed, a commercially available programme. At the immediate posttest, updating training produced only marginal improvements relative to control, but this was sustained and became significant six months post-training. Cogmed training resulted in substantial improvement at immediate posttest, but became marginal at delayed posttest. Neither type of training resulted in better performance in mathematics or generalised to other WM tasks that differed between WM or updating capacity and mathematics performance may be moderated by factions that do not benefit directly from improved capacity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.03.001

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In four studies, different groups completed different WM training programs.

    “In four studies different groups completed different WM training programs: updating and Cogmed RM (Ang, Lee, Cheam, Poon, & Koh (2015); complex span and running span (Foster et al., 2017) complex span and simple span (Harrison et al. (2013); n-back and complex span (Minear et al., 2016).”

    From Working memory training involves learning new skills (2019) · cites this paper as Ang, Lee, Cheam, Poon, & Koh, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ang, S. Y., Lee, K., Cheam, F., Poon, K., & Koh, J.
Affiliations
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Ministry of Education (SG)
Venue
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Published
2015-06
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
121-128
ISSN
  • 2211-3681 (ISSN-L)
  • 2211-369X
OpenAlex
W2097333735
Cited by
53
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
9.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • NIE Digital Repository (National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Education (OER17-11KL)
  • Ministry of Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
working memory training, Cogmed, mathematics achievement, children, long-term maintenance, generalizability, computer-based training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review