Cited by 107Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsEducational and Psychological Assessments

Working memory training and interpreting interactions in intelligence interventions

Redick, Thomas S.·2015·Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intell.2015.01.014

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These crossover interactions artificially produced large effect sizes and are responsible for the significant effect of N-back training and transfer to nonverbal ability.

    “These crossover interactions thus artificially produced large effect sizes (Boot, Blakely, & Simons, 2011; Fischer-Baum, 2015; Redick, 2015; Redick & Webster, 2014), and are responsible for the significant effect of N-back training and transfer to nonverbal ability.”
  • Such a pattern provides no evidence for a training effect.

    “Contrary to the claims made in the original papers, we believe that such a pattern provides no evidence for a training effect (Redick, 2015).”
  • In some cases, statistically significant differences were due to post-intervention decreases in control group performance rather than enhancements in the n-back training group.

    “Redick [23] pointed out that in some cases, statistically significant differences were due not to post-intervention enhancements in the n-back training group, but rather, to post-intervention decreases in control group performance.”
  • A recent reinterpretation of working memory studies that reported positive effects of working memory training relative to control groups revealed that effects were due to decreases in control group performance, rather than reliable increases in training groups.

    “Additionally, a recent reinterpretation of working memory studies that reported positive effects of working memory training relative to control groups revealed that effects were due to decreases in control group performance, rather than reliable increases in training groups [23].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Redick, T. S.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Redick, Thomas S.
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
50
Pages
14-20
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052140431
Cited by
107
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5
FWCI
18.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
Keywords
working memory training, fluid intelligence, far transfer, training effectiveness, cognitive training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review