Cited by 105Sleep and related disordersSleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

The impact of experimental sleep restriction on affective functioning in social and nonsocial contexts among adolescents

Open access
McMakin, Dana L., Dahl, Ronald E., Buysse, Daniel J., Cousins, Jennifer C., Forbes, Erika E., Silk, Jennifer S., Siegle, Greg J., Franzen, Peter L.·2016·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Short sleep duration is highly prevalent in adolescence, and it prospectively predicts problems with emotional adjustment and psychiatric health. To move beyond epidemiological associations and inform models of developmental psychopathology, we experimentally restricted sleep to observe impacts on affective functioning. Based on the importance of social contexts to adolescent emotional experiences, we also examined the impact of restricted sleep on socioaffective functioning in an ecologically valid peer interaction task. Methods: In Study 1, adolescents (ages 11.5–15.0, n = 48) were randomly assigned to two nights of polysomnography‐monitored sleep restriction (4 hr in bed) or extension (10 hr in bed). One week later, they completed the other sleep manipulation. Affective functioning was assessed by self‐report and pupil response to standardized affective sounds. Study 2 used a similar protocol and invited adolescents (ages 12–15.0, n = 16) to the sleep laboratory along with 2–4 friends to observe affective behavior in a social context primed for peer conflict. Mixed effects models were used to evaluate the effect of sleep condition on affective outcomes. Results: Study 1 demonstrated increased negative affect following sleep restriction, relative to extension, on self‐report ( p = .02) and pupil measures ( p = .01). Study 2 replicated these effects (both p = .04) and demonstrated greater negative affective behavior in a peer social context ( p = .01). Exploratory analyses for positive affect showed reductions as assessed by self‐report ( p = .005), but not pupil ( p = .81), in Study 1; and no significant effects in Study 2 (self‐report, p = .14; pupil, p = .29; positive affective behavior, p = .43). Conclusions: Experimental sleep restriction in adolescence impacts negative affective functioning as evidenced by self‐report and pupil reactivity, as well as observed behavior in a social context primed for peer conflict. Implications for the impact of short sleep on developmental trajectories of emotional adjustment and psychiatric health, and opportunities for early intervention, are briefly discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.12568

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A sleep-deprivation study found that it led adolescents to show negative affect, conflict, withdrawal, and dominance during a social conflict task.

    “In line with this possibility, a study using a sleep-deprivation paradigm found it to lead adolescents to behave in ways characterized by negative affect, conflict, withdrawal, and dominance during a social conflict task (McMakin et al., 2016).”

    From Sleep and suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies (2020) · cites this paper as McMakin et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]11. Galv an, A. (2010). Adolescent development of the reward system. [Review]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 1-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McMakin, D. L., Dahl, R. E., Buysse, D. J., Cousins, J. C., Forbes, E. E., Silk, J. S., Siegle, G. J., & Franzen, P. L.
Affiliations
  • Florida International University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Franzen, Peter L.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-15
Volume
57
Issue
9
Pages
1027-1037
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2426080599
Cited by
105
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2
FWCI
16.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01 DA033064, K01 MH077106, K23MH092400, T32 HD049354, UL1 RR024153, UL1TR000005)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
sleep restriction, sleep duration, adolescents, negative affect, positive affect, pupil reactivity, emotional behavior, peer conflict, social environment, emotional adjustment, sleep deprivation, developmental psychopathology
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Affect, Child, Conflict, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Peer Group, Sleep Deprivation, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review