Cited by 41Intensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Effect of cognitively stimulating activities on symptom management of delirium superimposed on dementia: A randomized controlled trial

Open access
Kolanowski, Ann, Fick, Donna, Litaker, Mark, Mulhall, Paula, Clare, Linda, Hill, Nikki, Mogle, Jacqueline, Boustani, Malaz +2 more·2016·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether cognitively stimulating activities would reduce duration and severity of delirium and improve cognitive and physical function to a greater extent than usual care. Design: Single‐blind randomized clinical trial. Setting: Eight post‐acute care ( PAC ) facilities. Participants: Community‐dwelling older adults with dementia and delirium (N = 283). Intervention: Research staff provided cognitively stimulating activities daily for up to 30 days. Measurements: Primary outcomes were delirium duration (Confusion Assessment Method) and delirium severity (Delirium Rating Scale). Secondary outcomes were cognitive function (Digits Forward, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, CLOX ) and physical function (Barthel Index). Results: Mean percentage of delirium‐free days (intervention: 64.8%, 95% confidence interval ( CI ) = 59.6–70.1; control: 68.7%, 95% CI = 63.9–73.6; P = .37, Wilcoxon rank sum test) and delirium severity (range 0–39: intervention: 10.77, 95% CI = 10.10–11.45; control: 11.15, 95% CI = 10.50–11.80; difference 0.37, 95% CI = 0.56–1.31, P = .43) were similar in both groups. Significant differences for secondary outcomes favoring intervention were found (executive function (range 0–15): intervention: 6.58, 95% CI = 6.12–7.04; control: 5.89, 95% CI = 5.45–6.33; difference −0.69, 95% CI = 1.33 to −0.06, P = .03; constructional praxis (range 0–15): intervention: 8.84, 95% CI = 8.83–9.34; control: 7.53, 95% CI = 7.04–8.01; difference −1.31, 95% CI = 2.01 to −0.61, P < .001). After adjusting for baseline constructional praxis, the group comparison was no longer significant. Average length of stay was shorter in the intervention (36.09 days) than the control (53.13 days) group (standard error = 0.15, P = .01, negative binomial regression). Conclusion: Cognitively stimulating activities did not improve delirium but improved executive function and reduced length of stay. Resolution of delirium may require more‐intense nonpharmacological management when the individual has dementia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.14511

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Risk factors for delirium in dementia include sensory impairment, pain, polypharmacy, dehydration, intercurrent illnesses such as urinary tract infections or faecal impaction, and an unfamiliar or changing environment.

    “Risk factors for delirium in dementia include sensory impairment, pain, polypharmacy, dehydration, intercurrent illnesses, such as urinary tract infections or faecal impaction, and an unfamiliar or changing environment.286”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission (2020) · cites this paper as [286]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says that delirium risk factors can be modified, but does not identify the factors listed in the claim. Searches for dehydration, infection, faecal impaction, polypharmacy, sensory impairment, and environmental change found no passage in our copy that establishes this list as risk factors for delirium in dementia. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kolanowski, A., Fick, D., Litaker, M., Mulhall, P., Clare, L., Hill, N., Mogle, J., Boustani, M., Gill, D., & Yevchak‐Sillner, A.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health Washington Singer Laboratories Exeter United Kingdom
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Kolanowski, Ann
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-12
Volume
64
Issue
12
Pages
2424-2432
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2555962087
Cited by
40
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR012242)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
delirium, dementia, cognitively stimulating activities, delirium management, executive function, physical function, post-acute care, community-dwelling older adults, cognitive function, praxis, postural control, postural sway, postural stability
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Delirium, Dementia, Female, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Severity of Illness Index, Geriatric Assessment, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Subacute Care, Executive Function, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review