Product repair in a circular economy: Exploring public repair behavior from a systems perspective
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Repair practices are driven not only by consumers’ internal motivation, but also by external infrastructural, social including cultural, financial, and political factors. We explore these factors with the goal of understanding the public repair of electrical and electronic products (e‐products) from a systems perspective to help devise appropriate change interventions. We document (a) behavioral aspects, (b) techno‐economic factors, and (c) intervention strategies aimed at promoting repair practices. To gauge this, a survey was administered among 922 volunteers across 14 countries with experience in repairing e‐products at public repair events. Findings suggest that while behavioral constructs including personal values, beliefs, and attitudes toward product repair are the main proximal drivers of intention to repair, the ability to repair plays an important role. Further, these individual factors are influenced by the techno‐economic settings such as access to repair services, economic benefits, and the ease of product repair stands out as the key enablers for product lifetime extension. As per intervention strategies, the results highlight economic incentives, regulatory requirements, and public awareness as the key drivers. However, influencing repair behavior directly may not always be the most effective strategy. New initiatives to improve involvement should focus on more repairable products, exploiting the innovative potentials of commercial as well as non‐profit repair initiatives, education, and supporting the development of skills among volunteer repairers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
39% of Europeans cite high repair costs and logistical difficulties as deterrents to repair.
“with 39% citing high repair costs and logistical difficulties as deterrents [11].”
From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies economic factors, accessibility, time, and effort as barriers to repair among consumers surveyed in selected EU member states. It does not report that 39% cited these barriers, nor establish that figure for Europeans generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredConcerns about repair quality persist, often stemming from a lack of accessible, standardized repair services and uncertainty about replacement part reliability.
“Nevertheless, concerns about repair quality persist, often stemming from a lack of accessible, standardized repair services and uncertainty about replacement part reliability [11].”
From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
The Introduction (page unavailable) describes barriers to accessing repair services and the unavailability of spare parts. The Concluding Discussion (page unavailable) likewise discusses access to spare parts. Neither passage links those barriers to concerns about repair quality or addresses standardized services or the reliability of replacement parts. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredConsumer repair behavior remains limited despite increasing policy and industry focus on repairability.
“Despite increasing policy and industry focus on repairability, consumer repair behavior remains limited.”
From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
The Introduction says consumers’ actual participation in repair remains low despite stated willingness, and it describes growing right-to-repair policy activity. It does not establish that industry focus on repairability is increasing, so that part of the sentence is unsupported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOver 80% of Europeans recognize the environmental benefits of sustainable choices.
“EU surveys show that while over 80% of Europeans recognize the environmental benefits of sustainable choices, far fewer act on them.”
From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
The Introduction reports an EU survey in selected member states showing that willingness to repair exceeded actual repair behavior. Its 62%–83% figure measures willingness to repair, not recognition of environmental benefits; it does not establish that over 80% of Europeans recognize those benefits. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredConsumer willingness to engage in repair is closely tied to perceived self-efficacy.
“One reason is psychological: consumer willingness to engage in repair is closely tied to perceived self-efficacy.”
From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
Section 3.4.2 defines perceived behavioral control as how able participants felt to repair and reports that it predicted intention to repair at home. But section 3.4.1 finds attitude was a much stronger predictor at home, while attitude and subjective norms—not perceived ability—predicted intention to join public repair events. The claim is therefore too broad for the settings studied. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Targeted behavioral interventions such as skills training, peer support, and DIY repair tutorials can significantly boost repair intentions.
“Studies have shown that targeted behavioral interventions such as skills training, peer support, and do-it-yourself (DIY) repair tutorials can significantly boost repair intentions [11].”
From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
Section 3.4.2 (page unavailable) reports that education predicted intention to repair at home, including indirectly through attitude. The Concluding Discussion (page unavailable) links repair skills and social norms to repair intentions and discusses support for community repair groups. But this was a survey, not a test showing that skills training or peer support significantly boosted intentions; the cited passages do not establish an effect of DIY tutorials. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe attitude-behavior gap mirrors the well-documented gap between sustainable intentions and actions, and is broadly consistent with EU-level survey data showing that only 32% of Europeans have repaired an item in the past six months, with 39% citing cost and logistical difficulty as deterrents.
“This mirrors the welldocumented gap between sustainable intentions and actions [10,33,35] and is broadly consistent with EU-level survey data showing that only 32% of Europeans have repaired an item in the past six months, with 39% citing cost and logistical difficulty as deterrents [11].”
From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPolicy measures often fail to translate into user-level behavior change without active communication intermediaries.
“This mirrors prior findings that policy measures often fail to translate into user-level behavior change without active communication intermediaries [11,29,36].”
From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
The Systems framework model (§3.4.2; page unavailable) finds that education indirectly increased repair intention through attitude, and the Concluding discussion (§4; page unavailable) links policies and other interventions to repair practice. Neither passage finds that policy measures often fail to change user behavior without active communication intermediaries; that condition is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe results confirm that participants generally hold positive attitudes toward product repairability and recycled materials.
“The results confirm that participants generally hold positive attitudes toward product repairability and recycled materials, aligning with growing normative support for repair as a central circular economy strategy [3,11].”
From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
The Concluding Discussion (page unavailable) identifies attitudes and subjective norms as important predictors of participation in public repair, supporting the sentence’s connection to social support for repair. The paper does not establish that this support is growing over time. The citing authors’ findings about their own participants’ views of repairability and recycled materials are not findings attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe use of general product categories in the primary survey reflects a deliberate Stage 1 design choice consistent with exploratory consumer research.
“The use of general product categories in the primary survey reflects a deliberate Stage 1 design choice consistent with exploratory consumer research”
From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
Section 2.2 (Data collection; page unavailable) says the paper deliberately designed questionnaires around two broad product groups. It does not address the citing study’s Stage 1 design choice or establish that this choice is consistent with exploratory consumer research; its own respondents were volunteer repairers. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFollowing the Ecodesign Regulation (European Commission No. 666/2013), awareness among end users was similarly slow to develop without targeted communication efforts.
“following the Ecodesign Regulation (European Commission No. 666/2013) [40], awareness among end users was similarly slow to develop without targeted communication efforts [11,36].”
From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
The Systems definition section (page unavailable) identifies education—providing information about repair—as an intervention, and the Concluding discussion says a legal framework can establish awareness. The paper does not report that end-user awareness developed slowly after Ecodesign Regulation No. 666/2013 or that the absence of targeted communication caused such a delay. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredConsumers express positive attitudes towards repair and sustainability but are deterred by concerns about repair quality, durability, cost, and effort.
“Consistent with previous studies, consumers express positive attitudes towards repair and sustainability but are deterred by concerns about repair quality, durability, cost, and effort [11,24,30].”
From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
The Introduction (page unavailable) describes consumers’ willingness to repair and says that economic factors, time, and effort can prevent that willingness from becoming action. It does not identify concerns about repair quality or durability as deterrents; its reference to shortened product lifespan is not a finding about the durability of repairs. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredRepair practices are shaped not only by consumers' internal motivation but also by external factors such as infrastructure, social and cultural influences, financial considerations, and political frameworks.
“As noted by Parajuly, repair practices are shaped not only by consumers' internal motivation but also by external factors such as infrastructure, social and cultural influences, financial considerations, and political frameworks [11].”
From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
There is a gap between consumers' positive attitudes toward sustainability and their actual repair practices.
“Despite widespread awareness of sustainability issues, there is a gap between consumers' attitudes and actions.”
From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
Repair must be understood as a socio-technical activity shaped by user capabilities, economic conditions, and product design, not simply a preference to be activated through awareness campaigns alone.
“Repair must therefore be understood as a socio-technical activity shaped by user capabilities, economic conditions, and product design, not simply a preference to be activated through awareness campaigns alone [7,11].”
From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
The consistency of the findings across the behavioral, economic, and functional dimensions and their alignment with independently published repair behavior studies provides convergent external validation that partially mitigates the limitations of single-method, single-time-point designs.
“Furthermore, the consistency of the findings across the behavioral, economic, and functional dimensions-and their alignment with independently published repair behavior studies [10,11,23,24,30]-provides a form of convergent external validation that partially mitigates the limitations inherent in single-method, single-time-point designs.”
From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
Only 32% of Europeans have repaired an item within six months instead of replacing it.
“Only 32% have repaired an item within six months instead of replacing it”
From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
The Introduction says actual participation in repair is low relative to willingness, but gives no 32% figure or six-month repair-versus-replacement measure. The Participants section describes a survey of volunteer repairers, not a representative estimate for Europeans. Searches for the percentage and six-month period found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Bovea, M. D., Pérez-Belis, V., & Quemades-Beltrán, P. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.069 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- Ackermann, L., Mugge, R., & Schoormans, J. (2018). Consumers' perspective on product care: An exploratory study of motivators, ability factors, and triggers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 380-391.
- Bradley, K., & Persson, O. (2022). Community repair in the circular economy -fixing more than stuff. Local Environment, 27(10-11), 1321-1337. https://doi. org/10.1080/13549839.2022.2041580 · DOI
- Bridgens, B., Powell, M., Farmer, G., Walsh, C., Reed, E., Royapoor, M., Gosling, P., Hall, J., & Heidrich, O. (2018). Creative upcycling: Reconnecting people, materials and place through making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.317 · DOI
- Cerulli-Harms, A., Suter, J., Landzaat, W., Duke, C., Diaz, A. R., Porsch, L., Peroz, T., Kettner, S., Thorun, C., Svatikova, K., Vermeulen, J., Smit, T., Dekeulenaer, F., & Lucica, E. (2018). Behavioural study on consumers' engagement in the circular economy. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2818/956512 · DOI
- Cooper, T., & Salvia, G. (2018). Fix it: Barriers to repair and opportunities for change. In R. Crocker, & K. Chiveralls (Eds), Subverting consumerism: Reuse in an accelerated world (pp. 147-165). Routledge.
- Crawford, M. B. (2010). Shop class as soulcraft: An inquiry into the value of work (Reprint ed.). Penguin Books.
- Echegaray, F., & Hansstein, F. V. (2017). Assessing the intention-behavior gap in electronic waste recycling: The case of Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 180-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.064 · DOI · Paper page
- European Commission, Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency, Duke, C., Thorun, C., Dekeulenaer, F. (2018). Behavioural study on consumers. engagement in the circular economy: final report, {CEU}. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2818/956512 · DOI
- Fang, W.-T., Ng, E., Wang, C.-M., & Hsu, M.-L. (2017). Normative beliefs, attitudes, and social norms: People reduce waste as an index of social relationships when spending leisure time. Sustainability, 9(10), 1696. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101696 Federal Trade Commission. (2021). FTC to ramp up law enforcement against illegal repair restrictions. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2021/07/ ftc-ramp-law-enforcement-against-illegal-repair-restrictions · DOI
- Hankammer, S., Brenk, S., Fabry, H., Nordemann, A., & Piller, F. T. (2019). Towards circular business models: Identifying consumer needs based on the jobs-to- be-done theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 341-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.165 · DOI
- Janmaimool, P., & Denpaiboon, C. (2016). Evaluating determinants of rural Villagers' engagement in conservation and waste management behaviors based on integrated conceptual framework of pro-environmental behavior. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 12(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-016-0045-3 · DOI
- Jiménez-Parra, B., Rubio, S., & Vicente-Molina, M.-A. (2014). Key drivers in the behavior of potential consumers of remanufactured products: A study on laptops in Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 488-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.047 · DOI
- Kumar, A. (2019). Exploring young adults' e-waste recycling behaviour using an extended theory of planned behaviour model: A cross-cultural study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 378-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
- Lechner, G., Wagner, M. J., Tena, A. D., Fleck, C., & Reimann, M. (2021). Exploring a regional repair network with a public funding scheme for customer repairs: The 'GRAZ repariert'-case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 288, 125588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125588 · DOI
- Lefebvre, M., Lofthouse, V., & Wilson, G. (2018). Towards a circular economy: Exploring factors to repair broken electrical and electronics products by users with pro-environmental inclination. In C. Storni, K. Leahy, M. McMahon, P. Lloyd, & E. Bohemia (Eds.), Design as a catalyst for change-DRS International Conference Proceedings, 25-28 June 2018, Limerick, Ireland. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.556 · DOI
- Lind, H. B., Nordfjærn, T., Jørgensen, S. H., & Rundmo, T. (2015). The value-belief-norm theory, personal norms and sustainable travel mode choice in urban areas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 119-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.001 · DOI
- López Dávila, M., Milios, L., Richter, J. L., & Dalhammar, C. (2021). Behavioural insights into personal electronics repair in Sweden. 20th European Roundtable on Sustainable Consumption and Production. Proceedingsof the 20th European Roundtable on Sustainable Consumption and Production, 321-343. https://doi.org/10.3217/978-3-85125-842-4-14 · DOI
- Makov, T., & Fitzpatrick, C. (2021). Is repairability enough? Big data insights into smartphone obsolescence and consumer interest in repair. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127561 · DOI
- Messmann, L., Boldoczki, S., Thorenz, A., & Tuma, A. (2019). Potentials of preparation for reuse: A case study at collection points in the German state of Bavaria. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 1534-1546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.264 · DOI
- Onel, N., & Mukherjee, A. (2017). Why do consumers recycle? A holistic perspective encompassing moral considerations, affective responses, and self-interest motives. Psychology & Marketing, 34(10), 956-971. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21035 · DOI
- Parajuly, K., & Wenzel, H. (2017). Potential for circular economy in household WEEE management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 151(C), 272-285. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.045 · DOI
- Richter, J. L., & Dalhammar, C. (2019). Drivers, barriers, and stakeholder roles in repair: A case study of Sweden. Product Lifetimes and the Environment Conference Proceedings, Berlin. https://portal.research.lu.se/en/publications/stakeholders-drivers-and-barriers-for-local-electronics-repair-a- Richter, J. L., Svensson-Hoglund, S., Dalhammar, C., Russell, J. D., & Thidell, Å. (2022). Taking stock for repair and refurbishing: A review of harvesting of spare parts from electrical and electronic products. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 27, 868-881. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13315 · DOI
- Sabbaghi, M., Esmaeilian, B., Cade, W., Wiens, K., & Behdad, S. (2016). Business outcomes of product repairability: A survey-based study of consumer repair experiences. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 109, 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.02.014 · DOI · Paper page
- Scott, K. A., & Weaver, T. (2014). To repair or not to repair: What is the motivation. Journal of Research for Consumers, (26), 1-31. http://www.jrconsumers.com/ Academic_Articles/issue_26/Issue26-AcademicArticle-Scott1-31.pdf
- Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81-97. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24707060
- Svensson-Hoglund, S., Richter, J. L., Maitre-Ekern, E., Russell, J. D., Pihlajarinne, T., & Dalhammar, C. (2021). Barriers, enablers and market governance: A review of the policy landscape for repair of consumer electronics in the EU and the U.S. Journal of Cleaner Production, 288, 125488. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jclepro.2020.125488 · DOI
- Svensson-Hoglund, S., Russell, J. D., & Richter, J. L. (2022). A process approach to product repair from the perspective of the individual. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00226-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Terzio glu, N. (2020). Repair motivation and barriers model: Investigating user perspectives related to product repair towards a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 125644, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125644 · DOI · Paper page
- Wang, B., Ren, C., Dong, X., Zhang, B., & Wang, Z. (2019). Determinants shaping willingness towards on-line recycling behaviour: An empirical study of household e-waste recycling in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 143, 218-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.005 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Circular value chain blind spot – A scoping review of the 9R framework in consumption
Hunger, T., Arnold, M., & Ulber, M. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140853 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints
Čok, V., Rihtaršič, J., Warell, A., & Tavčar, J. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18126270 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Parajuly, K., Green, J., Richter, J., Johnson, M., Rückschloss, J., Peeters, J., Kuehr, R., & Fitzpatrick, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Limerick (IE)
- Lund University (SE)
- Fraunhofer Institute for Reliability and Microintegration (DE)
- Flanders Make (Belgium) (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Richter, Jessika
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial Ecology
- Published
- 2023-10-13
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-86
- ISSN
- 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9290
- OpenAlex
- W4387616858
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 11
- FWCI
- 16.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Industrial Ecology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
- Funders
- Irish Research Council (713279)
- Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (2019‐02237, 2022‐02045)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
- Keywords
- product repair, circular economy, electrical and electronic equipment, repairability, economic incentives, public awareness, product life extension, systems approach
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review