Cited by 82Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Are opioid antagonists effective in attenuating the core symptoms of autism spectrum conditions in children: A systematic review

Roy, A., Roy, M., Deb, S., Unwin, G., Roy, A.·2015·Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: ASC (autism spectrum conditions) may result from a failure of striatal beta endorphins to diminish with maturation. Many symptoms of ASC resemble behaviours induced in animals or humans by opiate administration, including decreased socialisation, diminished crying, repetitive stereotypies, insensitivity to pain and motor hyperactivity. Naltrexone, an opioid antagonist, has been used in the management of children with ASC and can produce a clinically significant reduction in the serious and life-threatening behaviour of self-injury for individuals who have not been responsive to any other type of treatment and is important for this reason. It was therefore appropriate to reconsider the available evidence and a systematic review was undertaken. METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched for relevant journal articles. In addition, cross-referencing of pertinent reviews and a hand search for articles in major international intellectual disability (ID) journals between the years 2010 and 2012 was carried out to ensure that all relevant articles were identified. We also searched databases for unpublished clinical trials to overcome publication bias. Each database was searched up to present (February 2013) with no restrictions on the date of publication. The search terms consisted of broad expressions used to describe ID and autistic spectrum disorder as well as terms relating to opioid antagonists and specific drugs. All studies identified by the electronic database search and hand search were examined on the basis of title alone for relevance and duplication. The abstracts of the remaining papers were then scrutinised against the inclusion criteria. Where abstracts failed to provide adequate information, the full texts for these papers were obtained. All the full texts were then evaluated against the inclusion proforma. Two reviewers carried out all the stages of the process independently. The reviewers met to discuss their selections and where disagreements arose, these were settled by discussion with a member of the study group. Data from each study meeting the inclusion criteria were extracted on a pre-piloted data extraction form. The quality of each study was further assessed using the Jadad scale, a tool developed to assess the quality of randomised controlled trials. RESULTS: 155 children participated in 10 studies; 27 received placebo. Of the 128 that received naltrexone 98 (77%) showed statistically significant improvement in symptoms of irritability and hyperactivity. Side effects were mild and the drug was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Naltrexone may improve hyperactivity and restlessness in children with autism but there was not sufficient evidence that it had an impact on core features of autism in majority of the participants. It is likely that a subgroup of children with autism and abnormal endorphin levels may respond to naltrexone and identifying the characteristics of these children must become a priority.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jir.12122

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinical trials with predominantly μ-opioid blockers, such as naltrexone or naloxone, have yielded promising results in ameliorating both social and nonsocial deficits in autism.

    “clinical trials with predominantly μ-opioid blockers, such as naltrexone or naloxone (NAL), have yielded promising results in ameliorating both social and nonsocial deficits (11).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roy, A., Roy, M., Deb, S., Unwin, G., & Roy, A.
Affiliations
  • Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
Venue
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-03-04
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
293-306
ISSN
  • 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2788
OpenAlex
W2136581101
Cited by
82
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, naltrexone, opioid antagonists, irritability, hyperactivity, self-harm, children, intellectual disability, beta-endorphin, striatum, adverse drug reactions, treatment tolerability, core autism symptoms, pain insensitivity, socialization, motor hyperactivity, publication bias
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Naltrexone, Narcotic Antagonists, Psychomotor Agitation, Self-Injurious Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review