Cited by 78Mining and Resource ManagementExtractivism and Socioeconomic IssuesIndigenous Studies in Latin America

“Socios”: the contested morality of “partnerships” in Indigenous community-mining company relations, Northern Chile

Babidge, Sally·2013·The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology

Abstract

Resumen En 2007, una comunidad atacameña del norte de Chile y una empresa multinacional minera de cobre renovaron un trato de diez años con respecto al uso del territorio por parte de la empresa y el impacto causado debido a la extracción de recursos de agua subterránea. Las negociaciones entre la comunidad atacameña y la empresa minera están influenciadas por la presencia de un estado remoto o incluso ausente, lo que ha marcado la historia de la industria minera, y un discurso hegemónico internacional sobre los beneficios de las asociaciones de acuerdo a la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa. Los valores morales implícitos en la idea de “socio” sirven y a la vez restringen una relación que a primera vista pareciera caracterizarse por la hegemonía del neoliberalismo, pero narrativas locales de autosuficiencia y patronazgo histórico revelan ambigüedades y raíces más profundas. Este análisis etnográfico del compromiso comunidad‐empresa suscita una crítica de las condiciones de ser socios y lo enmarca en términos de controvertidas interpretaciones sobre la moralidad de las relaciones sociales y económicas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jlca.12020

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our research demonstrates that Atacameño action in relation to agreements is not simply a form of 'neoliberal agency' or a Gramscian consent to neoliberal instrumentality.

    “Likewise, our research demonstrates that Atacameño action in relation to agreements is not simply a form of 'neoliberal agency' (Gershon, 2011) or a Gramscian consent to neoliberal instrumentality (see also Babidge, 2013).”
  • As Babidge (2013) argues, Indigenous organizations are not only minor 'partners' in these agreements, but also those who risk the most, since the integrity of their environment is at stake and thus the very future of their communities.

    “As Babidge (2013) argues, Indigenous organizations are not only minor 'partners' in these agreements, but also those who risk the most, since the integrity of their environment is at stake and thus the very future of their communities.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Babidge, S.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Babidge, Sally
Venue
The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-07
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
274-293
ISSN
  • 1085-7052 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-4932
  • 1935-4940
OpenAlex
W1736257346
Cited by
78
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
6.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council (#DP1094069)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Mining and Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Studies in Latin America
Keywords
mining partnerships, corporate social responsibility, morality, Atacama Desert, copper mining, groundwater pumping, neoliberalism, patronage, self-sufficiency, local narratives, indigenous peoples

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review