Make Social Media Social Again: How Platform Interoperability Can Fix Social Media and Future‐Proof Democracy
Open accessAbstract
This essay argues that social media document (rather than fuel) the decline of political democracy while helping revive organizational democracy, including through ‘decentralized autonomous organizations’ (DAOs). Yet, despite giving everyone a voice and the ability to organize across borders, social media could over‐concentrate power if, in the future, a few large but siloed platforms ended up shrinking viewpoint diversity – the oxygen of democracy. How can we curb corporate platform concentration without dulling democracy? Due to trade‐offs in platform design, no single service can deliver free speech, free usage, and safe usage simultaneously. Fortunately, this ‘trilemma’ can be transcended at the industry level with an interoperability mandate that fosters user multihoming and lets various platforms provide different bundles of democratic benefits. Email works across service providers, and so can social media. Interoperability thus represents a viable answer based on six advantages: practical feasibility; competition on merit; faster complementor innovation; jurisdictional flexibility; unlocking network effects between, rather than just within platforms; and alignment with democratic values. Platform interoperability can make social media social again and future‐proof democracy. This proposal is a clarion call for blaming the Internet a little less for democracy’s problems and instead leveraging its infrastructure strategically to address them.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
9 of 57 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Outside the political sphere, most coordinated human activity takes place within organizations that are not democratic.
“Outside the political sphere, most coordinated human activity takes place within organizations that are not democratic (Battilana et al., 2025).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Battilana et al., 2025 source
In “The Historical Dominance of Non-Democratic Forms of Organizing” (page unavailable), the paper says non-democratic structures have become the default for organizing work across most contexts. That supports the claim about workplaces, but not its broader assertion about most coordinated human activity outside politics. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In large firms, employees are subject to authority stemming from the employment contract, rather than from the election of managers.
“In large firms, for instance, employees are subject to authority stemming from the employment contract, rather than from the election of managers (De Jong and Van Witteloostuijn, 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites De Jong and Van Witteloostuijn, 2004 source
In “Corporate Democracy in Breman's Practices” (page unavailable), the paper says most Dutch managers favor control and hierarchy, supporting the claim that employees are subject to managerial authority. It does not establish that this authority stems from the employment contract rather than the election of managers. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Social media platforms have reversed a longstanding trend, harmful to democracy, towards corporate media consolidation.
“Social media platforms have reversed a longstanding trend, harmful to democracy, towards corporate media consolidation (Adler et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Adler et al., 2023 source
“Organizing the Authoritarian State” (p. 12) links concentrated news-media ownership to the ease with which authoritarians can co-opt media. “Social Media” (p. 15) says platforms let people disseminate messages without vetting or filtering. Neither passage says social media reversed a longstanding trend toward corporate media consolidation. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Interoperability enables complementors to address a larger market comprising many platforms without finding themselves at the mercy of any single platform's sudden policy changes.
“interoperability enables complementors to address a larger market comprising many platforms without finding themselves at the mercy of any single platform's sudden policy changes (Rietveld et al., 2020;Thomas et al., 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Rietveld et al., 2020 source
The Demand Side Factors section says a platform with many users offers complementors a larger potential customer pool. The Conclusion and Cross Platform Variation sections describe governance changes that can compromise complementors’ value capture. The paper does not establish that interoperability lets complementors reach users across multiple platforms or protects them from any one platform’s policy changes. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Thomas et al., 2025 source
In “Enabling horizontal complementarities” (page unavailable), the paper says open standards permit interoperability independently of platform design and can link content across different services. “Platform governance” also discusses integrations across platform ecosystems. It does not say this gives complementors a larger market or protects them from a single platform’s sudden policy changes; “Interactions between horizontal and vertical complementarities” notes that platform changes can affect dependent complements. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
The only political factor that has substantially increased young voters' satisfaction with democracy in recent years is the election of a populist leader in their country.
“In fact, the only political factor that has substantially increased young voters' satisfaction with democracy in recent years is the election of a populist leader in their country.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Foa et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Surveys conducted in 75 countries show that the five-year period between 2002 and 2006 represents a turning point after which, for the first time, members of newer generations systematically express more dissatisfaction with democracy than their parents at the same age.
“Surveys conducted in 75 countries show that the five-year period between 2002 and 2006 represents a turning point after which, for the first time, members of newer generations systematically express more dissatisfaction with democracy than their parents at the same age (Foa et al., 2020, p. 10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Foa et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Dissatisfaction with democracy is best predicted by inequalities built up 25 years prior in Foa et al.'s longitudinal cross-country dataset.
“Such dissatisfaction is best predicted by inequalities built up 25 years prior in their longitudinal cross-country dataset (pp.16-17), meaning that today's democratic disarray may have been shaped by decisions made a quarter of a century ago (e.g., about healthcare, housing, pensions, education, energy, debt).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Foa et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
A regulatory mandate for platform interoperability based on open standards would make it possible for any user to communicate across platforms.
“To achieve pluralism, I propose a regulatory mandate for platform interoperability based on open standards.This would make it possible for any user to communicate across platforms, much like users of Google's email client (a.k.a.Gmail) are able to communicate with users of Microsoft's email client (a.k.a.Outlook).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Less than 8% of the world population lives in a country considered a 'full democracy'.
“Less than 8% of the world population lives in a country considered a 'full democracy' (The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2024, p. 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Democracy is an exception in our world, rather than the norm.
“Democracy is an exception in our world, rather than the norm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Social media promote accountability by making it easy for leaders to report on their actions and for people to call out leaders who do not walk the talk.
“They promote accountability by making it easy for leaders to report on their actions and for people to call out leaders who do not walk the talk.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The trilemma can be transcended at the industry level with an interoperability mandate that fosters user multihoming and lets various platforms provide different bundles of democratic benefits.
“Fortunately, this 'trilemma' can be transcended at the industry level with an interoperability mandate that fosters user multihoming and lets various platforms provide different bundles of democratic benefits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Social media enable free speech and reporting, within the legal boundaries of each jurisdiction, by letting users produce and share content decentrally.
“They enable free speech and reporting, within the legal boundaries of each jurisdiction (Howard, 2024), by letting users produce and share content decentrally.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Howard, 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
There are very few people on earth who simultaneously reside in a fully democratic country and work in a fully democratic organization.
“As a result, there are very few people on earth who simultaneously reside in a fully democratic country and work in a fully democratic organization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Social media can work across service providers like email.
“Email works across service providers, and so can social media.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Email works seamlessly across clients and providers.
- Interpretationreasoning
Niche platforms and new entrants would be able to compete with various, and possibly less nefarious, value propositions on the basis of unified multihoming.
“Niche platforms and new entrants would be able to compete with various, and possibly less nefarious value propositions on the basis of unified multihoming -by enhancing users' ability to post across several platforms ('multihoming'), optionally under a single digital identity ('unified').”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Social media risks losing their independent voice when dominated by any central power, private or governmental, that could improperly meddle in the 'semi-public spheres' that they provide to society.
“social media risks losing their independent voice when dominated by any central power, private or governmental, that could improperly meddle in the 'semi-public spheres' that they provide to society (Habermas, 2022, p. 167; see also Tirole, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
A consequence of concurrent trends predating social media is a tendency for younger voters to turn to populist parties that promise to kick the table.
“A consequence of these concurrent trends, which predate social media, is a tendency for younger voters to turn to populist parties that promise to kick the table.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Available evidence contradicts common wisdom according to which social media platforms help bring populists to power, who then cause democratic decline.
“In sum, available evidence contradicts common wisdom according to which social media platforms help bring populists to power, who then cause democratic decline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Today's democratic disarray may have been shaped by decisions made a quarter of a century ago about healthcare, housing, pensions, education, energy, and debt.
“meaning that today's democratic disarray may have been shaped by decisions made a quarter of a century ago (e.g., about healthcare, housing, pensions, education, energy, debt).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
These measures (algorithmic audits, users flagging, independent oversight) are already mandated in the European Union by the 2022 Digital Services Act, the 2023 Digital Markets Act, and the 2024 Artificial Intelligence Act.
“they are already mandated in the European Union by the 2022 Digital Services Act, the 2023 Digital Markets Act, and the 2024 Artificial Intelligence Act”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites 2022 Digital Services Act
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites 2023 Digital Markets Act
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites 2024 Artificial Intelligence Act
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Social media adds checks and balances at the interface of traditional media conglomerates and society.
“Social media adds checks and balances at the interface of traditional media conglomerates and society.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Empirical political science shows that growing inequalities and the decline of social trust, which began in the 1970s in the West, correlate with a decline of political democracy.
“Instead, empirical political science shows that growing inequalities and the decline of social trust, which began in the 1970s in the West, correlate with a decline of political democracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Foa et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Younger voters see little ideological difference between the centre-left and centre-right parties that have shared power since the 1980s.
“Furthermore, the younger voters see little ideological difference between the centre-left and centre-right parties that have shared power since the 1980s.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The crucial difference in governance is not between private and state control, but between dispersed and concentrated authority.
“the crucial difference is not between private (Cennamo and Karanović, 2025) and state control (Castelló et al., 2025), but between dispersed and concentrated authority.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Turning social media platforms into regulated public utilities would imply pushing them under the purview of states and their governments.
“turning social media platforms into regulated public utilities, as suggested by Castelló et al. (2025), would imply pushing them under the purview of states and their governments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Castelló et al. (2025)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Many of the initiatives Cennamo and Karanović present as promising have in fact been in place for years already, with questionable impact.
“many of the initiatives they present as promising have in fact been in place for years already, with questionable impact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cennamo and Karanović (2025)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
With incentives misaligned with the stated goal, a failure of governance is likely in participatory governance proposals.
“With incentives misaligned with the stated goal, a failure of governance is likely.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Implementing 'credential verification for expertise validation' on social media, so that posts by accredited experts weigh more by design, aligns with technocracy rather than democracy.
“implementing 'credential verification [...] for expertise validation' (Castelló et al., 2025, this issue) on social media, so that posts by accredited experts weigh more by design, aligns with technocracy rather than democracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Castelló et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
This design choice decreases the relative value of selling targeted advertising, since centralized ML platforms would do this more cost-effectively.
“This design choice decreases the relative value of selling targeted advertising, since centralized ML platforms would do this more cost-effectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In a unified multihoming scenario, where power users opt to have a unique digital identity across social media, complementors find themselves in a good position to target and onboard new customers through a single touchpoint.
“In a unified multihoming scenario, where power users opt to have a unique digital identity across social media, complementors find themselves in a good position to target and onboard new customers through a single touchpoint.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Without interoperability, most potential entrants will never get a chance to compete with the multibillion-user platforms owned by Meta or Tencent.
“Without interoperability, most potential entrants will never get a chance to compete with the multibillion-user platforms owned by Meta or Tencent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
With interoperability, industry pluralism follows almost mechanically: entrants can go to market without blitzscaling to a billion users on endless venture capital just to survive.
“With interoperability, industry pluralism follows almost mechanically: entrants can go to market without blitzscaling to a billion users on endless venture capital just to survive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A social media platform can be designed to meet any two of the three goals, but not all three.
“a social media platform can be designed to meet any two of the three goals, but not all three.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The three core benefits we expect from a healthy ecosystem in a democracy are free speech, free usage, and safe usage.
- Interpretationreasoning
Centralized ML platforms will not voluntarily make these tools compatible with their service.
“centralized ML platforms will not voluntarily make these tools compatible with their service.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
With user 'cliques' acting as local attractors, winner-take-all effects fail to materialize so long as those local ties remain strong.
“With user 'cliques' acting as local attractors, winner-take-all effects fail to materialize so long as those local ties remain strong (as demonstrated by Lee et al. (2006) via simulation).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lee et al. (2006) source
- Interpretationreasoning
Interoperability sustains competition across business models: ad-supported free services exist alongside paid options with safer privacy settings.
“interoperability sustains competition across business models: ad-supported free services (e.g., Gmail) exist alongside paid options with safer privacy settings (e.g., Proton).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
With interoperability, custom moderation filters created by users can be shared with others.
“With interoperability, custom moderation filters created by users can even be shared with others.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In a long-run competitive equilibrium, such a platform cannot offer entirely free usage.
“in a long-run competitive equilibrium, such a platform cannot offer entirely free usage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The problem with social media curation is not that fact-checking is lacking or insufficient, but that people no longer trust the fact checkers.
“the problem with social media curation is not that fact-checking is lacking or insufficient, but that people no longer trust the fact checkers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Another reason why email interoperability has kept winner-take-all pressure in check is 'multihoming', namely, the ability to use several platforms simultaneously and with little friction.
“Another reason why email interoperability has kept winner-take-all pressure in check is 'multihoming', namely, the ability to use several platforms simultaneously and with little friction”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Interoperability is necessary to create industry pluralism.
“Interoperability is necessary to create industry pluralism, but other factors further shape its ultimate impact -notably, suitable downstream regulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Interoperability lowers that cost by enabling seamless cross-posting, giving platform entrants a fair shot to showcase their value proposition.
“Interoperability lowers that cost by enabling seamless cross-posting (e.g., to one's Instagram followers and to Bluesky users), giving platform entrants a fair shot to showcase their value proposition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
The digital tools for democratic deliberation that Castelló and colleagues call for already exist (e.g., Polis).
“the digital tools for democratic deliberation that Castelló and colleagues call for already exist, as discussed earlier (e.g., Polis).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Castelló et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
To remain competitive, a platform optimizing jointly for safe usage and free speech would have to generate revenues in a different way (e.g., charging end users small fees or having them lock yield-bearing digital assets).
“to remain competitive, a platform optimizing jointly for safe usage and free speech would have to generate revenues in a different way.This can be done by charging end users small fees (e.g., Farcaster) or by having them lock yield-bearing digital assets to cover the platform's operating costs (e.g., Status Network).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
In a global capitalist order where business competition is nested within economic competition between states, crackdowns on platform oligopolies are likely to remain limited in scope and effect.
“Yet in a global capitalist order where business competition is nested within economic competition between states (Durand and Vergne, 2013), such crackdowns are likely to remain limited in scope and effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Durand and Vergne, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
By boosting multihoming, interoperability lets people sustain engagement with various cliques across platforms.
“By boosting multihoming, interoperability lets people sustain engagement with various cliques across platforms (e.g., family on Facebook, friends on Farcaster).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
More generally, interoperability is beneficial for any kind of complementor: build once, deploy seamlessly across many platforms.
“More generally, interoperability is beneficial for any kind of complementor: build once, deploy seamlessly across many platforms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In every scenario, the platform would steer towards a {free usage, free speech} configuration.
“In every scenario, the platform would steer towards a {free usage, free speech} configuration (e.g., X. com).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Across jurisdictions, open banking forces large incumbents to share their customer data with new entrants in a standardized form.
“Across jurisdictions, open banking forces large incumbents to share their customer data with new entrants (e.g., fintech start-ups) in a standardized form.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
To re-establish free usage, the platform would have to earn revenue elsewhere.
“To re-establish free usage, the platform would have to earn revenue elsewhere.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Interoperability based on open standards enables third parties to introduce value-adding 'middleware' - complementor apps sitting between the platform and the user interface.
“Interoperability based on open standards enables third parties to introduce value-adding 'middleware' -in essence, complementor apps sitting between the platform and the user interface (Hogg and DiResta, 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hogg and DiResta, 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Interoperability delivers pluralism without resorting to platform bans, break-ups, or politically driven moderation.
“Crucially, it delivers pluralism without resorting to platform bans, break-ups, or politically driven moderation -illiberal measures that echo autocratic playbooks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
An interoperable connective tissue expands the menu of viable business models.
“An interoperable connective tissue expands the menu of viable business models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A platform charging a $2 account fee and $0.05 per post would make a bot campaign of 200,000 accounts posting 20 times a day for 200 days cost over $40 million.
“Consider a platform that charges a small account fee (e.g., $2) and a micro-fee per post (e.g., $0.05).Revenue is earned without targeted advertising, and the posting fee operates as an anti-spam filter: a bot campaign of 200,000 accounts posting 20 times a day for 200 days would cost over $40 million.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
An open interoperability standard lowers the barrier to onboarding users without dismantling pre-existing network effects.
“An open interoperability standard does just that by lowering the barrier to onboarding users, yet without dismantling pre-existing network effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Three open standards for social media exist at scale: ActivityPub, AT Protocol, and DSNP.
- Interpretationreasoning
This fee-based model is particularly well positioned to combat online manipulation aimed at spreading misinformation and interfering with democratic values.
“This model is particularly well positioned to combat online manipulation aimed at spreading misinformation and interfering with democratic values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 72
- May combine two claims. 65
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationUnpacking social media platform heterogeneity challenges traditional perspectives that focus on a handful of US corporate platforms operating in Western democratic countries.
“Unpacking social media platform heterogeneity challenges traditional perspectives, such as those of Castelló et al. (2025) and Cennamo and Karanović (2025), who focus on a handful of US corporate platforms operating in Western democratic countries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Castelló et al. (2025)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Cennamo and Karanović (2025) source
The paper does not confine its discussion to platforms operating in Western democracies. In “How Social Media Platforms Can Empower Democratic Resilience” (page unavailable), it discusses participation across the globe, especially in authoritarian regimes; “Limits of SMPs’ Current Governance Models” also discusses content moderation in India and Thailand. These passages contradict the citing sentence’s characterization of its geographic focus. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCorporate managers are neither elected by the public nor are their actions controlled by democratic institutions and procedures.
“As Scherer and Palazzo (2011, p. 907) remind us, 'corporate managers are neither elected by the public', nor are their actions 'controlled by democratic institutions and procedures'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Scherer and Palazzo (2011) source
In “Corporate Responsibility on Globalized Markets: A New Perspective” (p. 907), the paper says corporate managers are not elected by the public. It says their political interventions in global public policy are not sufficiently controlled by democratic institutions and procedures—not that their actions generally are uncontrolled. The citing sentence omits both qualifications. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCompetition among filters addresses the moderation problem; people who want safe spaces can have them.
“As put by Van Alstyne (2024, p. 31), 'competition among filters addresses the moderation problem.People who want safe spaces can have them'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Alstyne, 2024 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationVan Alstyne (2024) emphasizes several analogies used to calibrate regulation in the US telecommunications sector.
“Van Alstyne (2024) emphasizes several analogies used to calibrate regulation in the US telecommunications sector.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Alstyne (2024) source
The Abstract (page unavailable) discusses several analogies—including publishers, common carriers, the marketplace of ideas, and a city parade—to assess how social media platforms should be regulated. It does not present them as analogies used to calibrate regulation across the US telecommunications sector; its focus is social media. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSocial media enables a broad set of stakeholders to express critiques of firm policies, thus reducing the capacity of traditional media and firms' public relations efforts to shape public attention.
“For instance, in the business world, 'social media enables a broad set of stakeholders to express critiques of firm policies', thus 'reduc [ing] the capacity of traditional media and firms' public relations efforts to shape public attention' (Leonel et al., 2024, p. 3175;Etter et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Leonel et al., 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Etter et al., 2019 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenSince the start of the century, increasing numbers of young people have decided to leave a democratic country in which they had a life to relocate to a nondemocratic country.
“Since the start of the century, increasing numbers of young people have decided to leave a democratic country in which they had a life to relocate to a nondemocratic country (e.g., Dubai, Thailand, Singapore, more recently Saudi Arabia).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationWhen a populist leader is elected, youth satisfaction with democracy increases by 16 percentage points on average, but exhibits no change when office is won by a moderate or status quo politician.
“When that happens, 'youth satisfaction with democracy increases by 16 percentage points on average, but exhibits no change when office is instead won by a moderate or status quo politician' (Foa et al., 2020, p. 26).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Foa et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenNone of Discord, Bluesky, Mastodon, Farcaster, and Nostr has implemented 'surveillance capitalism' to date.
“None of these social media platforms, to date, has implemented 'surveillance capitalism'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationGrassroots e-petitioning on social media can compel firms to respond to stakeholders, thus opening up avenues for social movement mobilization.
“Grassroots e-petitioning on social media can compel firms to respond to stakeholders, thus opening up avenues for social movement mobilization (Leonel et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Leonel et al., 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe concentration of media industries has been increasing slightly since 2004 for content media, while it has been decreasing substantially for platform media, resulting in a slight net decrease in overall concentration thanks to platform entrants.
“Contrary to common belief (Castelló et al., 2025), evidence shows that the concentration of media industries has been increasing slightly since 2004 for content media, while it has been decreasing substantially for platform media, resulting in a slight net decrease in overall concentration thanks to platform entrants (Noam, 2016(Noam, , pp. 1026(Noam, -1027)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Noam, 2016 source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThis rise in satisfaction appears regardless of political leaning, emerging when either left-wing populism or right-wing populism gains power through elections.
“This rise in satisfaction appears regardless of political leaning, emerging when either left-wing populism (as in Greece, Spain, Mexico, Ecuador) or rightwing populism (as in Austria, Hungary, Brazil, Poland) gains power through elections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Foa et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSocial media document rather than fuel the decline of political democracy while helping revive organizational democracy, including through DAOs.
“This essay argues that social media document (rather than fuel) the decline of political democracy while helping revive organizational democracy, including through 'decentralized autonomous organizations' (DAOs).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenSocial media's role in the erosion of political democracy has been mischaracterized, and its contribution to renewing organizational democracy has been overlooked by scholars and policymakers alike.
“Social media's role in the erosion of political democracy has been mischaracterized, and its contribution to renewing organizational democracy has been overlooked by scholars and policymakers alike.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenPlatform interoperability maintains regulators' flexibility across jurisdictions.
“it maintains regulators' flexibility across jurisdictions;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenPlatform interoperability aligns with democratic values while making digital media truly 'social' again.
“it aligns with democratic values while making digital media truly 'social' again.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenPlatform interoperability is practically feasible at a reasonable cost.
“Interoperability thus represents a viable answer based on six advantages: practical feasibility; competition on merit; faster complementor innovation; jurisdictional flexibility; unlocking network effects between, rather than just within platforms; and alignment with democratic values.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenPlatform interoperability levels the competitive playing field by enabling network effects not only within, but also between platforms.
“it levels the competitive playing field by enabling network effects not only within, but also between platforms;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPlatform interoperability can make social media social again and future-proof democracy.
“Platform interoperability can make social media social again and future-proof democracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenDue to trade-offs in platform design, no single service can deliver free speech, free usage, and safe usage simultaneously.
“Due to trade-offs in platform design, no single service can deliver free speech, free usage, and safe usage simultaneously.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenPlatform interoperability fosters innovation by complementors.
“it fosters innovation by complementors;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn family businesses, authority is typically derived from heredity, not employee consent, whereas in religious organizations, authority is often derived from divine right.
“In family businesses, authority is typically derived from heredity, not employee consent, whereas in religious organizations, authority is often derived from divine right.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenPluralism would ensure that viable alternatives can thrive beside centralized ML platforms that maximize ad revenue through targeted display of clickbait content.
“Among other advantages, pluralism would ensure that viable alternatives can thrive beside centralized machine learning (ML) platforms that maximize ad revenue through targeted display of clickbait content (e.g., Instagram).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenEven political democracies do not run democratically their own government organizations.
“Ironically, even political democracies do not run democratically their own government organizations (e.g., cabinet, government agencies, state-owned corporations).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSocial media could over-concentrate power if, in the future, a few large but siloed platforms ended up shrinking viewpoint diversity.
“Yet, despite giving everyone a voice and the ability to organize across borders, social media could over-concentrate power if, in the future, a few large but siloed platforms ended up shrinking viewpoint diversity -the oxygen of democracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPlatform interoperability makes platform size matter less and platform quality matter more.
“it makes platform size matter less and platform quality matter more;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSurveillance capitalism always involves a combination of centralized ML and advertiser revenue, and can be implemented by digital platforms outside the social media sector, such as search engines and smartphone operating systems.
“if surveillance capitalism always involves a combination of centralized ML and advertiser revenue, the strategy can be implemented by digital platforms outside the social media sector -for example, by search engines and by smartphone operating systems (Zuboff, 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zuboff, 2022 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThis narrow focus is limiting our ability to envision what democracy-enhancing regulation might look like because it overlooks the crucial role that social media platforms can play in autocracies, in organizations, and outside corporate control.
“This narrow focus is limiting our ability to envision what democracy-enhancing regulation might look like because it overlooks the crucial role that social media platforms can play (i) in autocracies, by challenging the status quo; (ii) in organizations, by enabling democratic governance; and (iii) outside the sphere of corporate control, by providing public infrastructure”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningWhen young people read on social media about low tax rates, drug-free streets, good schools, and reliable healthcare in stable polities led by benevolent autocrats, they begin to wonder whether alternatives to democracy might be worth exploring.
“So, when they read on social media about low tax rates, drug-free streets, good schools, and reliable healthcare in stable polities led by benevolent autocrats, they begin to wonder whether alternatives to democracy might be worth exploring.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThese democratic benefits of social media can only materialize when digital platforms truly enable free speech, give users equal opportunities to join the conversation independently of socio-economic background, and do not bias participation by exposing some users to harm.
“These democratic benefits of social media can only materialize when digital platforms truly enable free speech, give users equal opportunities to join the conversation (independently of their socio-economic background), and do not bias participation by exposing some users to harm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn this context, social media platforms have mostly been documenting the growing public frustration with political democracy, while making highly visible some possible alternatives to democratic government.
“In this context, social media platforms have mostly been documenting the growing public frustration with political democracy, while making highly visible some possible alternatives to democratic government.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn non-Western countries, including Pakistan, Bangladesh, the Philippines, and Turkey, democracy began to recede in the mid-1990s.
“Meanwhile, in non-Western countries, including Pakistan, Bangladesh, the Philippines, and Turkey, democracy began to recede in the mid-1990s (The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningBy explicitly recognizing social media's institutional role in democracies, governments give regulators a legitimate mandate to oversee the industry and act if necessary.
“By explicitly recognizing social media's institutional role in democracies, governments give regulators a legitimate mandate to oversee the industry and act if necessary.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThose exiting democracies do not specifically seek out autocracies, but they no longer view the absence of democratic government as a deal-breaker.
“While those exiting democracies do not specifically seek out autocracies, they no longer view the absence of democratic government as a deal-breaker, as they certainly would have 30 years ago.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSocial media have fostered diversity in the media industry by spawning dozens of platforms with various value propositions.
“Besides de-concentration, social media have also fostered diversity in the media industry by spawning dozens of platforms with various value propositions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWith taxes at their all-time high since WWII and failing public infrastructure, many among the youth wonder where all the money is going.
“With taxes at their all-time high since WWII and failing public infrastructure, many among the youth wonder 'where all the money is going' (@Jamie_IF, 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites @Jamie_IF, 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenSocial media platforms enable the free expression of diverse viewpoints and new ideas in an online environment that lets people cooperate at scale.
“Social media platforms, now on the forefront, enable the free expression of diverse viewpoints and new ideas in an online environment that lets people cooperate at scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenDigitally enabled democracy has been on the rise, propelled by initiatives involving platforms, protocols, and software tools.
“Digitally enabled democracy has been on the rise, propelled by initiatives involving platforms, protocols, and software tools ranging from the more innocuous (e.g., Twitter polls to survey one's followers) to the more radical (e.g., Wikileaks' encrypted drop box to force government transparency).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCertain choices of core technology prefigure certain platform designs, which then make certain business models more competitive and viable.
“certain choices of core technology prefigure certain platform designs (e.g., Gulati et al., 2026), which then make certain business models more competitive than others, and thus more viable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gulati et al., 2026 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenSocial trust in the media, the government, and universities has declined since the early 1970s.
“Indeed, social trust in the media, the government, and universities has declined since the early 1970s.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningOther platform configurations can foster democratic engagement by building authority dispersion into their design.
“Other platform configurations, by contrast, can foster democratic engagement by building authority dispersion into their design”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationComparable US proposals, such as the 2023 Algorithmic Accountability Act, have stalled, with scant evidence of voluntary uptake by US platform corporations.
“comparable US proposals, such as the 2023 Algorithmic Accountability Act, have stalled, with scant evidence of voluntary uptake by US platform corporations”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 2023 Algorithmic Accountability Act
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWealth and income inequality are among the few variables that covary with, and plausibly explain, growing dissatisfaction with democracy.
“To explain this increasingly lower appeal of democracy, Foa and colleagues need not mention social media, whose growth occurred after 2006; instead, they bring up evidence that, over the long term, 'wealth and income inequality' are 'among the few variables that covary' with, and plausibly explain growing dissatisfaction with democracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Foa et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
PremisereasoningSocial media platforms can implement alternative strategies to surveillance capitalism.
“social media platforms can implement alternative strategies, and when they do, critics do not seem concerned with adverse consequences for democracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSome attribute the shortcomings of their home countries to democracy itself, in particular on politicians' obsession with short-term re-election rather than buildup of socially valuable infrastructure for future generations.
“Some even attribute the shortcomings of their home countries to democracy itself -in particular, on politicians' obsession with their short-term re-election, rather than with the buildup of socially valuable infrastructure for future generations (Acemoglu, 2025).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Acemoglu, 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAgainst longstanding democratic decline, the election of populist leaders actually increases young voters' satisfaction with democracy, but only temporarily.
“Against this longstanding democratic decline, the election of populist leaders actually increases young voters' satisfaction with democracy, but only temporarily.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Foa et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenTo date, it has not been possible to process user behavioural data at scale to serve ads cost-effectively on a decentralized platform powered by a public blockchain.
“to date, it has not been possible to process user behavioural data at scale to serve ads cost-effectively on a decentralized platform powered by a public blockchain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningSocial media platforms are fostering new forms of organizational democracy that support authority dispersion in lieu of managerial hierarchies and shareholder primacy.
“As this section now discusses, social media platforms are fostering new forms of organizational democracy that support authority dispersion in lieu of managerial hierarchies and shareholder primacy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenGoing forward, nothing guarantees that enough viable platforms will enter and maintain healthy diversity in social media.
“Yet, going forward, nothing guarantees that enough viable platforms will enter and maintain healthy diversity in social media.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCrouch coined the term 'post-democracy' to describe polities where a cross-partisan elite has gradually formed around shared core beliefs, with political alternance making little difference to voters.
“Crouch (2004) coined the term 'post-democracy' -again, before the social media era -to describe polities where a cross-partisan elite has gradually formed around shared core beliefs, with political alternance making little difference to voters as a result.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Crouch (2004)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn 1995, Robert Putnam diagnosed that citizens in established democracies are questioning the effectiveness of their public institutions and that democratic disarray may be linked to a broad and continuing erosion of civic engagement that began a quarter-century earlier.
“In 1995, Robert Putnam famously diagnosed that, 'in the established democracies, […] citizens are questioning the effectiveness of their public institutions' and 'there is reason to suspect that this democratic disarray may be linked to a broad and continuing erosion of civic engagement that began a quarter-century ago' (Putnam, 1995, p. 78).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Putnam, 1995 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPolitical democratization plateaued in the early 1990s and, by the mid-1990s, several Western democracies, including the U.S., were showing signs of political decay, distrust, and declining civic and political engagement.
“Political democratization plateaued in the early 1990s and, 'by the mid-1990s, several Western democracies, including the U.S., were showing signs of political decay, distrust, and declining civic and political engagement' (Diamond, 2022, p. 163).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Diamond, 2022 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSocial media's damaging effects on democracy stem from one specific strategic configuration: the centralized ML platform optimized for third-party advertising (Facebook, TikTok, X, Instagram).
“social media's damaging effects on democracy stem from one specific strategic configuration, namely, the centralized ML platform optimized for third-party advertising (Facebook, TikTok, X, Instagram).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenA crucial complementor app in an interoperable world is the multihoming client used to cross-post content onto several social media platforms.
“A crucial complementor app in an interoperable world is the multihoming client used to cross-post content onto several social media platforms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationGiven pronounced demand heterogeneity, with early and later adopters differing and generations of users clustering by platform, interoperability bridges both platforms and generations, thereby improving social understanding.
“Given pronounced demand heterogeneity, with early and later adopters differing and generations of users clustering by platform (Rietveld and Eggers, 2018), interoperability thus bridges both platforms and generations, thereby improving social understanding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rietveld and Eggers, 2018 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenOne such business model optimizes for safe usage and free speech, even if it means users must pay a small fee; in this configuration, it is users who decide how to moderate the content in their feed.
“One such business model optimizes for safe usage and free speech, even if it means users must pay a small fee.In this configuration, it is users who decide how to moderate the content in their feed (e.g., Bluesky, Mastodon, Farcarster, Nostr).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWith pluralism, platforms compete in different ways, using a diversity of core technologies and designs, and in equilibrium a pluralist ecosystem welcomes a diversity of business models.
“With pluralism, platforms compete in different ways.They use a diversity of core technologies (e.g., ML, blockchain) and a diversity of designs (e.g., centralized and concentrated, à la X; distributed but centralized, à la Discord; distributed and partly decentralized, à la Bluesky; distributed and decentralized, à la Nostr) (see Table I for examples and Vergne, 2020 on the distinction between Dec”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe goal of safe usage can be achieved by leaving decisions about moderation up to the users, shifting the platform towards a {safe usage, free speech} configuration.
“the goal of safe usage could be achieved by leaving decisions about moderation up to the users, shifting the platform towards a {safe usage, free speech} configuration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAdvertisers expect centralized algorithms that push targeted ads effectively to the most suitable users; to do that, the platform must concentrate authority in the hands of its managers.
“Advertisers expect centralized algorithms that push targeted ads effectively to the most suitable users.To do that, the platform must concentrate authority in the hands of its managers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAuthority dispersion around moderation means a user is free to speak, but never forced to listen to other users and advertisers deemed undesirable.
“Authority dispersion around moderation means a user is free to speak, but never forced to listen to other users and advertisers deemed undesirable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningInteroperability fosters pluralism but does not replace democratic law-making.
“Interoperability fosters pluralism but does not replace democratic law-making.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn sum, interoperability makes platform size matter less and platform quality matter more, thereby warding off industry concentration and fostering pluralism.
“In sum, interoperability makes platform size matter less and platform quality matter more, thereby warding off industry concentration and fostering pluralism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningEmail exhibits strong network effects: its value rises with the size of the user base; yet open protocols keep those effects from becoming monopoly power by making providers interoperable.
“Email exhibits strong network effects: its value rises with the size of the user base.Yet open protocols (SMTP/IMAP) keep those effects from becoming monopoly power by making providers interoperable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationTheir corporate owners have no incentive to let complementor apps 'encourage constructive engagement rather than fragmentation', as this would reduce total user engagement with attention-grabbing, revenue-generating content.
“their corporate owners have no incentive to let complementor apps 'encourage constructive engagement rather than fragmentation' (Castelló et al., 2025, this issue), as this would reduce total user engagement with attention-grabbing, revenue-generating content.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Castelló et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenNo single social media platform can, on its own, deliver all three core benefits (free speech, free usage, safe usage) in a democracy.
“no single social media platform can, on its own, deliver all three core benefits we expect from a healthy ecosystem in a democracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The three core benefits we expect from a healthy ecosystem in a democracy are free speech, free usage, and safe usage.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe recent realization that the platform oligopoly had become powerful enough to rival state authority has triggered crackdowns aimed at regaining political control, both in the USA and China.
“The recent realization that the platform oligopoly had become powerful enough to rival state authority has triggered crackdowns aimed at regaining political control, both in the USA (Lopez, 2025) and China (Zhang, 2025).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lopez, 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Zhang, 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIt lowers the breakeven point a complementor must hit on any single platform, unlocking capital for innovative social media services that are not worth developing for today's siloed platforms.
“It lowers the breakeven point a complementor must hit on any single platform, unlocking capital for innovative social media services that are not worth developing for today's siloed platforms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe proposal for an interoperability mandate is technically feasible and has been shown to work in practice in comparable settings.
“The proposal for an interoperability mandate, aimed at ensuring that users can communicate across platforms, is technically feasible and has been shown to work in practice in comparable settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBy designing a platform with authority dispersion, each user could decide for themselves which moderation algorithm and content filter to use, resulting in a custom newsfeed suited to the user's safety preferences.
“By designing a platform with authority dispersion (e.g., Mastodon), each user could decide for themselves which moderation algorithm and content filter to use, resulting in a custom newsfeed suited to the user's safety preferences (e.g., Bluesky).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThird-party merchants expect their paid influencer content to not be censorable by non-paying users; here again, the platform must re-centralize to prevent censorship of sponsored content.
“Third-party merchants expect their paid influencer content to not be censorable by non-paying users.Here again, the platform must re-centralize to prevent censorship of sponsored content.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe tool 'Polis', built for democratic deliberation, could be used in combination with Facebook and X.com to emphasize the views that users share rather than those that divide them (this is currently impossible due to closed APIs and lack of standardization).
“the tool 'Polis', built for democratic deliberation, could be used in combination with Facebook and X. com to emphasize the views that users share rather than those that divide them (this is currently impossible due to closed APIs and lack of standardization).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSocial media are well suited to interoperable networking: users have a 'local bias' for adopting the service their friends already use rather than the largest platform overall.
“social media are well suited to interoperable networking: users have a 'local bias' for adopting the service their friends already use rather than the largest platform overall (Lee et al., 2006(Lee et al., , p. 1839)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lee et al., 2006 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenInteroperability mandates are not particularly costly, and their cost need not be borne by taxpayers.
“Interoperability mandates are not particularly costly, and their cost need not be borne by taxpayers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOver the past two decades, a platform oligopoly, controlled by a handful of US and Chinese mega-corporations, has emerged through anticompetitive practices tacitly condoned by both governments for geopolitical gain.
“Over the past two decades, a platform oligopoly, controlled by a handful of US and Chinese mega-corporations, has emerged through anticompetitive practices tacitly condoned by both governments for geopolitical gain (Zuboff, 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zuboff, 2022 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEarly integration is ideal, but industries can add interoperability even at mature stages; the banking sector is a case in point, with 'open banking' mandates having been implemented recently in the UK, Brazil, South Korea, and Hong Kong.
“Early integration is ideal, but industries can add interoperability even at mature stages.The banking sector is a case in point, with 'open banking' mandates having been implemented recently in the UK, Brazil, South Korea, and Hong Kong, among others (Ziegler, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ziegler, 2021 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIn a freemium model, power users have limited revenue upside and little willingness to pay unless their content gets a visibility advantage; this requires centralization to implement top-down curation tailored to paying customers.
“In the absence of advertisers and merchants, however, power users (e.g., influencers) have limited revenue upside and little willingness to pay unless their content gets a visibility advantage.This, again, requires centralization to implement top-down curation tailored to paying customers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rietveld, 2018 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe decline in the authority of traditional social institutions began before 1990 and has been growing ever since.
“the decline in the authority of traditional social institutions began before the year 1990 and has been growing ever since.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fukuyama, 2020 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThree interoperability protocols have already been developed for social media, thus providing a sound technical basis for further standardization.
“three interoperability protocols have already been developed for social media, thus providing a sound technical basis for further standardization (see Appendix A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMultihoming clients would represent an entirely new market segment along the social media industry's value chain, where a lot of innovation would happen and a lot of value could be captured by incumbents and new complementors alike.
“Multihoming clients would represent an entirely new market segment along the social media industry's value chain, where a lot of innovation would happen and a lot of value could be captured by incumbents and new complementors alike.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningWithout interoperability, the network effects that originally made platforms 'social' are there primarily to preserve the interests of today's dominant platforms.
“Without interoperability, the network effects that originally made platforms 'social' are there primarily to preserve the interests of today's dominant platforms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningProviders need not achieve global scale to remain viable; network effects also accrue at the industry level, and not just within branded platforms.
“providers need not achieve global scale to remain viable; network effects also accrue at the industry level, and not just within branded platforms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningNo regulation can compel a social media platform to deliver free speech, free usage, and safe usage simultaneously.
“no regulation can compel a social media platform to deliver free speech, free usage, and safe usage simultaneously.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The three core benefits we expect from a healthy ecosystem in a democracy are free speech, free usage, and safe usage.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenToday, content creators face high opportunity costs when posting on a nascent service with a small user base and no pre-existing following.
“Today, content creators face high opportunity costs when posting on a nascent service with a small user base and no pre-existing following.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationWhere a platform refrains from editorial control, lets users curate their own feeds, and relies on permissionless server infrastructure, it better aligns with the 'common carrier' analogy and can be plausibly viewed as infrastructure within a free 'marketplace for ideas'.
“Conversely, where a platform refrains from editorial control, lets users curate their own feeds, and relies on permissionless server infrastructure, it better aligns with the 'common carrier' analogy and can be plausibly viewed as infrastructure within a free 'marketplace for ideas'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Social media platforms will self-select into configurations that solve the trilemma if interoperability is mandated.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFree usage is incompatible with full authority dispersion, and that is by design, meaning that regulation cannot change that.
“free usage is incompatible with full authority dispersion -and that is by design, meaning that regulation cannot change that.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningTo optimize for safe usage, heavy-handed moderation is bound to constrain caricature, parody, and pastiche, resulting in a curb on free speech.
“To optimize for safe usage, we may opt for heavy-handed moderation that is bound to constrain caricature, parody, and pastiche, resulting in a curb on free speech.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningInteroperability preserves regulatory flexibility and lets jurisdictions tailor its economic, political, and legal impacts.
“Interoperability has desirable properties in this respect because it preserves regulatory flexibility and lets jurisdictions tailor its economic, political, and legal impacts (see Appendix A for details).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe {free usage, safe usage} configuration involving heavy platform moderation, as on YouTube, may be more aligned with the 'publisher' analogy than the {safe usage, free speech} configuration exemplified by Mastodon, Bluesky, or Farcaster.
“The {free usage, safe usage} configuration involving heavy platform moderation, as on YouTube, may be more aligned with the 'publisher' analogy than the {safe usage, free speech} configuration exemplified by Mastodon, Bluesky, or Farcaster.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Social media platforms will self-select into configurations that solve the trilemma if interoperability is mandated.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningFor power users such as influencers, brands, and public authorities, the multihoming experience could be simplified by setting up a unified identity across platforms.
“For power users such as influencers, brands, and public authorities, the multihoming experience could be simplified by setting up a unified identity across platforms”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTo achieve pluralism, it is not sufficient to grant data rights to users; what is needed is social media protocol interoperability, which requires a regulatory mandate for open standards.
“To achieve pluralism, it is not sufficient to grant data rights to users.What is needed is social media protocol interoperability, which requires a regulatory mandate for open standards.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBy distributing decision-making about curation and moderation, users are free to speak, but never forced to listen.
“by distributing decision-making about curation and moderation, users are free to speak, but never forced to listen.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIn a pluralist social media industry, any user can find a platform that meets their preferences by offering a viable solution to the trilemma.
“In a pluralist social media industry, any user can find a platform that meets their preferences by offering a viable solution to the trilemma.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningInteroperability neither casts the government as moderator-of-last-resort nor relies on a naïve libertarian bet that industry self-governance will yield a healthy ecosystem.
“By contrast, interoperability neither casts the government as moderator-of-last-resort nor relies on a naïve libertarian bet that industry self-governance will magically yield a healthy ecosystem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEasier multihoming (enabled by interoperability) leads to healthier competition and decreases the risk of harmful platform dominance.
“With multihoming made easier, competition becomes healthier, and the risk of harmful platform dominance decreases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Users will choose to multihome when interoperability makes it easier.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAt this stage of the industry's development, pluralism requires a regulatory mandate for platform interoperability letting new entrants onboard users in a multihoming environment that does not destroy pre-existing network effects.
“At this stage of the industry's development, pluralism requires a regulatory mandate for platform interoperability letting new entrants onboard users in a multihoming environment that does not destroy pre-existing network effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Social media platforms will self-select into configurations that solve the trilemma if interoperability is mandated.
- Rests on an assumption: Regulators in large markets are willing and able to mandate interoperability and enforce it.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe competitive playing field is distorted by years of national champion building.
“To level a competitive playing field distorted by years of national champion building, new platform entrants must be able to compete on merit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningInteroperability lets users sample alternatives without materially curtailing current usage, widening their networks as they assess competing offers.
“By enabling content to flow across platforms and complementor apps, interoperability lets users sample alternatives without materially curtailing current usage, widening their networks as they assess competing offers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThere is little empirical evidence that social media platforms empower the 'wrong' politicians who then degrade democracy.
“Likewise, the belief that social media platforms empower the 'wrong' politicians who then degrade democracy is hardly supported by empirical evidence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningInteroperability resolves the trilemma at the industry level: users can speak and move across platforms, access free or paid options, and curate their own experience without being funnelled into content they do not wish to see.
“Interoperability resolves the trilemma at the industry level: users can speak and move across platforms, access free or paid options, and curate their own experience without being funnelled into content they do not wish to see.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAn app's native features will never look as good on another app, which preserves product-based competitive advantages; yet, feature parity management enables cross-app network effects, thus boosting the sociality of social media while levelling the competitive playing field.
“An app's native features will never look as good on another app, which preserves product-based competitive advantages; yet, feature parity management enables cross-app network effects, thus boosting the sociality of social media while levelling the competitive playing field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPluralism is radically different from both the self-regulation status quo proposed by Cennamo and Karanović (2025) and the technocratic public-utility model that Castelló et al. (2025) would have the state enforce.
“Pluralism is radically different from both the self-regulation status quo proposed by Cennamo and Karanović (2025) and the technocratic public-utility model that Castelló et al. (2025) would have the state enforce.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cennamo and Karanović (2025) source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites Castelló et al. (2025)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningInteroperability is needed to give new platforms implementing the fee-based model a chance to onboard users locked in the platform siloes controlled by Alphabet, ByteDance, Meta, and Tencent.
“To give new platforms implementing this model a chance to onboard users locked in the platform siloes controlled by Alphabet, ByteDance, Meta, and Tencent, interoperability is needed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Regulators in large markets are willing and able to mandate interoperability and enforce it.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationPluralism aligns with liberal democracy understood as a regime of compromise.
“Pluralism is a fitting organizing principle for social media that aligns with liberal democracy understood as a regime of compromise (Mill, 1865).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mill, 1865
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningInteroperability advances democratic pluralism by enabling crossplatform communication and restoring competitive entry without prescribing a single 'correct' platform design, business model, or approach to moderation.
“It advances democratic pluralism by enabling crossplatform communication and restoring competitive entry -all without prescribing a single 'correct' platform design, business model, or approach to moderation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningInteroperability is a necessary lever to realize pluralism.
“Interoperability is a necessary lever to realize pluralism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningInteroperability lets the social media industry as a whole deliver free speech, free usage, and safe usage.
“Interoperability lets the social media industry as a whole deliver free speech, free usage, and safe usage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSuch fee-based economics deter manipulation while appealing to users who value low-noise feeds and privacy.
“Such economics deter manipulation while appealing to users who value low-noise feeds and privacy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningSolving the trilemma can only be done at the industry level by nurturing pluralism.
“Solving the trilemma can only be done at the industry level, then, by nurturing pluralism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBy connecting cliques of users across platforms, interoperability weakens proprietary siloes and makes digital media truly 'social' again.
“By connecting cliques of users across platforms, interoperability weakens proprietary siloes and makes digital media truly 'social' again.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenEvery social media platform faces the same trilemma preventing it from delivering at once the three democratic benefits of free speech, free usage, and safe usage.
“Due to inherent trade-offs, every social media platform faces the same trilemma preventing it from delivering at once the three democratic benefits of free speech, free usage, and safe usage (see Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenPluralism fosters the competitive coexistence of different kinds of platforms, including services that privilege free speech and safe usage over free usage.
“Pluralism fosters the competitive coexistence of different kinds of platforms, including services that privilege free speech and safe usage over free usage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn a pluralist industry, three categories of platforms coexist and compete, each one delivering two of three benefits with its own configuration of core technology, platform design, and business model.
“In a pluralist industry, three categories of platforms coexist and compete, each one delivering two of three benefits with its own configuration of core technology, platform design, and business model (see Table I).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenStronger fact-checking will not solve the problem if people no longer trust fact checkers to begin with.
“The belief that stronger fact-checking will solve the problem is futile if people no longer trust fact checkers to begin with.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
No top-down regulation can mitigate the platform-level design limitation (the trilemma).
“I argue that no top-down regulation can mitigate this design limitation at the platform level, and I propose instead to resolve the trilemma at the industry level by nurturing pluralism in the sector.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Email works seamlessly across clients and providers.
“Email works seamlessly across clients and providers, and so can social media.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The three core benefits we expect from a healthy ecosystem in a democracy are free speech, free usage, and safe usage.
“These three goals are referred to as free speech, free usage, and safe usage.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Three open standards for social media exist at scale: ActivityPub, AT Protocol, and DSNP.
“Currently, three open standards for social media exist at scale: ActivityPub (as used by Mastodon, Misskey, possibly Threads in the future); AT Protocol (as used and developed by Bluesky); and DSNP ('Decentralized Social Networking Protocol', which Project Liberty intended to use in combination with the Frequency blockchain as part of their 'people's bid' to acquire TikTok US).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Users will choose to multihome when interoperability makes it easier.
“With multihoming made easier, competition becomes healthier, and the risk of harmful platform dominance decreases.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Social media platforms will self-select into configurations that solve the trilemma if interoperability is mandated.
“As social media platforms self-select into configurations that solve the 'trilemma' described earlier, regulators can calibrate applicable regulations to fit national law and the priorities of elected representatives.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Regulators in large markets are willing and able to mandate interoperability and enforce it.
“The regulator of a large market sets a deadline by which all social media platforms must implement interoperability based on open standards.”
Cites
Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital
Putnam, R. D. (1995) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002 · Cited by 14,037 · see citing works
Big other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization
Zuboff, S. (2015) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2015.5 · Cited by 2,978 · see citing works
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x · Cited by 2,131 · see citing works
The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry
Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., & Warren, R. (1961) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1952530 · Cited by 1,182 · see citing works
Social media and the formation of organizational reputation
Etter, M., Ravasi, D., & Colleoni, E. (2019) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0280 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
An‐ arrgh ‐chy: The Law and Economics of Pirate Organization
Leeson, P. T. (2007) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/526403 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
AI can help humans find common ground in democratic deliberation
Tessler, M. H., Bakker, M. A., Jarrett, D., Sheahan, H., Chadwick, M. J., Koster, R., Evans, G., Campbell-Gillingham, L., Collins, T., Parkes, D. C., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adq2852 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Reflections and Hypotheses on a Further Structural Transformation of the Political Public Sphere
Habermas, J. (2022) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/02632764221112341 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Demand Heterogeneity in Platform Markets: Implications for Complementors
Rietveld, J., & Eggers, J. P. (2018) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1183 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Zuboff, S. (2022) · Organization Theory · doi:10.1177/26317877221129290 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Workplace democracy—The recent debate
Frega, R., Herzog, L. M., & Neuhäuser, C. (2019) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12574 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Vergne, J. (2020) · Organization Theory · doi:10.1177/2631787720977052 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Self-citationDeephouse, D. L., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2008) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9864-3 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Reconsideration of the Winner-Take-All Hypothesis: Complex Networks and Local Bias
Lee, E., Lee, J., & Lee, J. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0571 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Creating and capturing value from freemium business models: A demand‐side perspective
Rietveld, J. (2018) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1279 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Rietveld, J., Ploog, J. N., & Nieborg, D. B. (2020) · Academy of Management Discoveries · doi:10.5465/amd.2019.0064 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Who Owns the World's Media?: Media Concentration and Ownership around the World
Noam, E. M., & Concentration Collaboration, T. I. M. (2016) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199987238.001.0001 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
The future of the web? The coordination and early‐stage growth of decentralized platforms
Hsieh, Y., & Vergne, J. (2022) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3455 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citationCorporate Purpose Needs Democracy
Davis, G. F. (2020) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12659 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
The political economy of special economic zones
Moberg, L. (2014) · Journal of Institutional Economics · doi:10.1017/s1744137414000241 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Tirole, J. (2021) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20201214 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Platform capitalisms and platform cultures
Steinberg, M., Zhang, L., & Mukherjee, R. (2024) · International Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.1177/13678779231223544 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
30 Years of World Politics: What Has Changed?
Fukuyama, F. (2020) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.2020.0001 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Democracy's Arc: From Resurgent to Imperiled
Diamond, L. (2022) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.2022.0012 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Authoritarianism, Populism, and the Global Retreat of Democracy: A Curated Discussion
Adler, P. S., Adly, A., Armanios, D. E., Battilana, J., Bodrožić, Z., Clegg, S., Davis, G. F., Gartenberg, C., Glynn, M. A., Aslan Gümüsay, A., et al. (2023) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/10564926221119395 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
de Jong, G., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2004) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/ame.2004.14776169 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
The Real Dangers of Generative AI
Allen, D., & Weyl, E. G. (2023) · Journal of democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.2024.a915355 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
The platformization of the public sphere and its challenge to democracy
Fischer, R., & Jarren, O. (2023) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/01914537231203535 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Young-Hyman, T. D., Magné, N., & Kruse, D. L. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2022.1622 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Location-Independent Organizations: Designing Collaboration Across Space and Time
Rhymer, J. (2022) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/00018392221129175 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Affects in Online Stakeholder Engagement: A Dissensus Perspective
Castelló, I., & Berzosa, D. L. (2021) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2021.35 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Toward a Participatory Digital Ethnography of Blockchain Governance
Rennie, E., Zargham, M., Tan, J., Miller, L., Abbott, J., Nabben, K., & De Filippi, P. (2022) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/10778004221097056 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Vertical and horizontal complementarities in platform ecosystems
Thomas, L. D. W., Ritala, P., Karhu, K., & Heiskala, M. (2025) · Innovation · doi:10.1080/14479338.2024.2303593 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Cennamo, C., Marchesi, C., & Meyer, T. (2020) · Academy of Management Discoveries · doi:10.5465/amd.2019.0044 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Scherer, A. G., & Neesham, C. (2023) · Organization Theory · doi:10.1177/26317877231204083 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
On Democratic Organizing and Organization Theory
Battilana, J., Beckman, C. M., & Yen, J. (2025) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/00018392251322430 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Spillover effect of workplace democracy: A conceptual revision
Rybnikova, I. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933263 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Implementation of Open Banking Protocols Around the World
Ziegler, T. (2021) · The Palgrave Handbook of Technological Finance · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65117-6_27 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Some challenges for the “new DAOism”: a comment on Klima DAO
He, V. F., & Puranam, P. (2024) · Journal of Organization Design · doi:10.1007/s41469-023-00159-5 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Firms’ Response to Slacktivism: When and Why are E‐Petitions Effective?
Leonel, R., Rehbein, K. A., Westermann-Behaylo, M. K., et al. (2023) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13010 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Prosocial MediaPreprint
Weyl, E. G., Thorburn, L., de Keulenaar, E. V., Mchangama, J., Siddarth, D., & Tang, A. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5141171 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Free Speech vs. Free Ride: Navigating the Supreme Court’s Social Media Paradox
Van Alstyne, M. (2024) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3696194 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A large-scale field experiment on participatory decision-making in China
Wu, S. J., Mai, K. M., Zhuang, M., & Yi, F. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-01964-y · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Correction to: Bitcoin and the rise of decentralized autonomous organizations
Hsieh, Y., Vergne, J., Anderson, P., et al. (2019) · Journal of Organization Design · doi:10.1186/s41469-019-0041-1 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial Media Is a Threat for Democracy! A Political Perspective for Analysing and Diminishing Harm
Castelló, I., Colleoni, E., Scherer, A. G., & Trittin‐Ulbrich, H. (2025) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.70053 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Are Social Media Platforms a Threat to Democracy? An Ecosystem Governance Perspective 
Cennamo, C., & Karanovic, J. (2025) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5698044 · Cited by 4
Gulati, P., Marchetti, A., & Puranam, P. (2026) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.04127 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Farewell to Westphalia: Crypto Sovereignty and Post-Nation-State Governaance
Hope, J., & Ludlow, P. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.09840 · Cited by 2
Web3 as Decentralization Theater? A Framework for Envisioning Decentralization Strategically
Vergne, J. (2024) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20240000089010 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationFacts and Where to Find Them: Empirical Research on Internet Platforms and Content Moderation
Keller, D., & Leerssen, P. (2020) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · doi:10.1017/9781108890960
Community by DesignPreprint
Weyl, E. G., Thorburn, L., de Keulenaar, E. V., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.10834
The Future of Trust will be Dystopian or Decentralized: Escaping the Metaverse
Vergne, J.-P. (2021) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3925635
Self-citationCastello, I., Colleoni, E., Scherer, A. G., et al. (2025) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5394977
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Bey H., 2003, T.A.Z.: The Temporary Autonomous Zone, Ontological Anarchy, Poetic Terrorism
- Coyer C., 2025, Utah Data Sharing Law Creates Path to Upend Social Media Model
- Crouch C., 2004, Post‐Democracy
- Durand R., 2013, The Pirate Organization: Lessons from the Fringes of Capitalism
- Elad B., 2025, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations Statistics 2025: Market Growth, Governance, and Industry Adoption
- Foa R., 2020, Youth and Satisfaction with Democracy: Reversing the Democratic Disconnect?
- Hogg L., 2024, Shaping the Future of Social Media with Middleware
- Howard J. W., 2024, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Mill J. S., 1865, Considerations on Representative Government by John Stuart Mill
- Rediker M., 1987, Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea: Merchant Seamen, Pirates and the Anglo‐American Maritime World, 1700–1750
- Slobodian Q., 2023, Crack‐Up Capitalism: Market Radicals and the Dream of a World Without Democracy
- The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2024, Democracy Index 2023: Age of Conflict
- Vergne J. P., 2024, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 115
- World Economic Forum, 2022, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations: Beyond the Hype
Cited by
Sorted by citations
From Platform Design to Attention Governance: Rethinking Social Media Externalities
Benischke, M. H., & Post, C. A. (2026) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.70118 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vergne, J. P.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Vergne, J.P.
- ORCID
- Vergne, J.P.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-12-12
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W7114993990
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Management Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- social media, platform interoperability, platform concentration, organizational democracy, decentralized autonomous organizations, viewpoint diversity, freedom of expression, multihoming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review