Cited by 1Social Media and PoliticsDigital Platforms and EconomicsPolitical Theory and Democracy

Make Social Media Social Again: How Platform Interoperability Can Fix Social Media and Future‐Proof Democracy

Open access
Vergne, J.P.·2025·Journal of Management Studies

Abstract

This essay argues that social media document (rather than fuel) the decline of political democracy while helping revive organizational democracy, including through ‘decentralized autonomous organizations’ (DAOs). Yet, despite giving everyone a voice and the ability to organize across borders, social media could over‐concentrate power if, in the future, a few large but siloed platforms ended up shrinking viewpoint diversity – the oxygen of democracy. How can we curb corporate platform concentration without dulling democracy? Due to trade‐offs in platform design, no single service can deliver free speech, free usage, and safe usage simultaneously. Fortunately, this ‘trilemma’ can be transcended at the industry level with an interoperability mandate that fosters user multihoming and lets various platforms provide different bundles of democratic benefits. Email works across service providers, and so can social media. Interoperability thus represents a viable answer based on six advantages: practical feasibility; competition on merit; faster complementor innovation; jurisdictional flexibility; unlocking network effects between, rather than just within platforms; and alignment with democratic values. Platform interoperability can make social media social again and future‐proof democracy. This proposal is a clarion call for blaming the Internet a little less for democracy’s problems and instead leveraging its infrastructure strategically to address them.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joms.70048

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

9 of 57 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Outside the political sphere, most coordinated human activity takes place within organizations that are not democratic.

    “Outside the political sphere, most coordinated human activity takes place within organizations that are not democratic (Battilana et al., 2025).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Battilana et al., 2025 source

      In “The Historical Dominance of Non-Democratic Forms of Organizing” (page unavailable), the paper says non-democratic structures have become the default for organizing work across most contexts. That supports the claim about workplaces, but not its broader assertion about most coordinated human activity outside politics. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    In large firms, employees are subject to authority stemming from the employment contract, rather than from the election of managers.

    “In large firms, for instance, employees are subject to authority stemming from the employment contract, rather than from the election of managers (De Jong and Van Witteloostuijn, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites De Jong and Van Witteloostuijn, 2004 source

      In “Corporate Democracy in Breman's Practices” (page unavailable), the paper says most Dutch managers favor control and hierarchy, supporting the claim that employees are subject to managerial authority. It does not establish that this authority stems from the employment contract rather than the election of managers. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation

    Social media platforms have reversed a longstanding trend, harmful to democracy, towards corporate media consolidation.

    “Social media platforms have reversed a longstanding trend, harmful to democracy, towards corporate media consolidation (Adler et al., 2023).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Adler et al., 2023 source

      “Organizing the Authoritarian State” (p. 12) links concentrated news-media ownership to the ease with which authoritarians can co-opt media. “Social Media” (p. 15) says platforms let people disseminate messages without vetting or filtering. Neither passage says social media reversed a longstanding trend toward corporate media consolidation. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Interoperability enables complementors to address a larger market comprising many platforms without finding themselves at the mercy of any single platform's sudden policy changes.

    “interoperability enables complementors to address a larger market comprising many platforms without finding themselves at the mercy of any single platform's sudden policy changes (Rietveld et al., 2020;Thomas et al., 2025).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Rietveld et al., 2020 source

      The Demand Side Factors section says a platform with many users offers complementors a larger potential customer pool. The Conclusion and Cross Platform Variation sections describe governance changes that can compromise complementors’ value capture. The paper does not establish that interoperability lets complementors reach users across multiple platforms or protects them from any one platform’s policy changes. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Thomas et al., 2025 source

      In “Enabling horizontal complementarities” (page unavailable), the paper says open standards permit interoperability independently of platform design and can link content across different services. “Platform governance” also discusses integrations across platform ecosystems. It does not say this gives complementors a larger market or protects them from a single platform’s sudden policy changes; “Interactions between horizontal and vertical complementarities” notes that platform changes can affect dependent complements. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    The only political factor that has substantially increased young voters' satisfaction with democracy in recent years is the election of a populist leader in their country.

    “In fact, the only political factor that has substantially increased young voters' satisfaction with democracy in recent years is the election of a populist leader in their country.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Foa et al., 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 72
  • May combine two claims. 65
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Unpacking social media platform heterogeneity challenges traditional perspectives that focus on a handful of US corporate platforms operating in Western democratic countries.

    “Unpacking social media platform heterogeneity challenges traditional perspectives, such as those of Castelló et al. (2025) and Cennamo and Karanović (2025), who focus on a handful of US corporate platforms operating in Western democratic countries.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Castelló et al. (2025)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Cennamo and Karanović (2025) source

      The paper does not confine its discussion to platforms operating in Western democracies. In “How Social Media Platforms Can Empower Democratic Resilience” (page unavailable), it discusses participation across the globe, especially in authoritarian regimes; “Limits of SMPs’ Current Governance Models” also discusses content moderation in India and Thailand. These passages contradict the citing sentence’s characterization of its geographic focus. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Corporate managers are neither elected by the public nor are their actions controlled by democratic institutions and procedures.

    “As Scherer and Palazzo (2011, p. 907) remind us, 'corporate managers are neither elected by the public', nor are their actions 'controlled by democratic institutions and procedures'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Scherer and Palazzo (2011) source

      In “Corporate Responsibility on Globalized Markets: A New Perspective” (p. 907), the paper says corporate managers are not elected by the public. It says their political interventions in global public policy are not sufficiently controlled by democratic institutions and procedures—not that their actions generally are uncontrolled. The citing sentence omits both qualifications. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Competition among filters addresses the moderation problem; people who want safe spaces can have them.

    “As put by Van Alstyne (2024, p. 31), 'competition among filters addresses the moderation problem.People who want safe spaces can have them'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Van Alstyne, 2024 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Van Alstyne (2024) emphasizes several analogies used to calibrate regulation in the US telecommunications sector.

    “Van Alstyne (2024) emphasizes several analogies used to calibrate regulation in the US telecommunications sector.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Van Alstyne (2024) source

      The Abstract (page unavailable) discusses several analogies—including publishers, common carriers, the marketplace of ideas, and a city parade—to assess how social media platforms should be regulated. It does not present them as analogies used to calibrate regulation across the US telecommunications sector; its focus is social media. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Social media enables a broad set of stakeholders to express critiques of firm policies, thus reducing the capacity of traditional media and firms' public relations efforts to shape public attention.

    “For instance, in the business world, 'social media enables a broad set of stakeholders to express critiques of firm policies', thus 'reduc [ing] the capacity of traditional media and firms' public relations efforts to shape public attention' (Leonel et al., 2024, p. 3175;Etter et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Leonel et al., 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Etter et al., 2019 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Since the start of the century, increasing numbers of young people have decided to leave a democratic country in which they had a life to relocate to a nondemocratic country.

    “Since the start of the century, increasing numbers of young people have decided to leave a democratic country in which they had a life to relocate to a nondemocratic country (e.g., Dubai, Thailand, Singapore, more recently Saudi Arabia).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    When a populist leader is elected, youth satisfaction with democracy increases by 16 percentage points on average, but exhibits no change when office is won by a moderate or status quo politician.

    “When that happens, 'youth satisfaction with democracy increases by 16 percentage points on average, but exhibits no change when office is instead won by a moderate or status quo politician' (Foa et al., 2020, p. 26).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Foa et al., 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    None of Discord, Bluesky, Mastodon, Farcaster, and Nostr has implemented 'surveillance capitalism' to date.

    “None of these social media platforms, to date, has implemented 'surveillance capitalism'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Grassroots e-petitioning on social media can compel firms to respond to stakeholders, thus opening up avenues for social movement mobilization.

    “Grassroots e-petitioning on social media can compel firms to respond to stakeholders, thus opening up avenues for social movement mobilization (Leonel et al., 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Leonel et al., 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The concentration of media industries has been increasing slightly since 2004 for content media, while it has been decreasing substantially for platform media, resulting in a slight net decrease in overall concentration thanks to platform entrants.

    “Contrary to common belief (Castelló et al., 2025), evidence shows that the concentration of media industries has been increasing slightly since 2004 for content media, while it has been decreasing substantially for platform media, resulting in a slight net decrease in overall concentration thanks to platform entrants (Noam, 2016(Noam, , pp. 1026(Noam, -1027)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Noam, 2016 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    This rise in satisfaction appears regardless of political leaning, emerging when either left-wing populism or right-wing populism gains power through elections.

    “This rise in satisfaction appears regardless of political leaning, emerging when either left-wing populism (as in Greece, Spain, Mexico, Ecuador) or rightwing populism (as in Austria, Hungary, Brazil, Poland) gains power through elections.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Foa et al., 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Social media document rather than fuel the decline of political democracy while helping revive organizational democracy, including through DAOs.

    “This essay argues that social media document (rather than fuel) the decline of political democracy while helping revive organizational democracy, including through 'decentralized autonomous organizations' (DAOs).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Social media's role in the erosion of political democracy has been mischaracterized, and its contribution to renewing organizational democracy has been overlooked by scholars and policymakers alike.

    “Social media's role in the erosion of political democracy has been mischaracterized, and its contribution to renewing organizational democracy has been overlooked by scholars and policymakers alike.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Platform interoperability maintains regulators' flexibility across jurisdictions.

    “it maintains regulators' flexibility across jurisdictions;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Platform interoperability aligns with democratic values while making digital media truly 'social' again.

    “it aligns with democratic values while making digital media truly 'social' again.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Platform interoperability is practically feasible at a reasonable cost.

    “Interoperability thus represents a viable answer based on six advantages: practical feasibility; competition on merit; faster complementor innovation; jurisdictional flexibility; unlocking network effects between, rather than just within platforms; and alignment with democratic values.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Platform interoperability levels the competitive playing field by enabling network effects not only within, but also between platforms.

    “it levels the competitive playing field by enabling network effects not only within, but also between platforms;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Platform interoperability can make social media social again and future-proof democracy.

    “Platform interoperability can make social media social again and future-proof democracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Due to trade-offs in platform design, no single service can deliver free speech, free usage, and safe usage simultaneously.

    “Due to trade-offs in platform design, no single service can deliver free speech, free usage, and safe usage simultaneously.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Platform interoperability fosters innovation by complementors.

    “it fosters innovation by complementors;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In family businesses, authority is typically derived from heredity, not employee consent, whereas in religious organizations, authority is often derived from divine right.

    “In family businesses, authority is typically derived from heredity, not employee consent, whereas in religious organizations, authority is often derived from divine right.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Pluralism would ensure that viable alternatives can thrive beside centralized ML platforms that maximize ad revenue through targeted display of clickbait content.

    “Among other advantages, pluralism would ensure that viable alternatives can thrive beside centralized machine learning (ML) platforms that maximize ad revenue through targeted display of clickbait content (e.g., Instagram).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Even political democracies do not run democratically their own government organizations.

    “Ironically, even political democracies do not run democratically their own government organizations (e.g., cabinet, government agencies, state-owned corporations).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Social media could over-concentrate power if, in the future, a few large but siloed platforms ended up shrinking viewpoint diversity.

    “Yet, despite giving everyone a voice and the ability to organize across borders, social media could over-concentrate power if, in the future, a few large but siloed platforms ended up shrinking viewpoint diversity -the oxygen of democracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Platform interoperability makes platform size matter less and platform quality matter more.

    “it makes platform size matter less and platform quality matter more;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Surveillance capitalism always involves a combination of centralized ML and advertiser revenue, and can be implemented by digital platforms outside the social media sector, such as search engines and smartphone operating systems.

    “if surveillance capitalism always involves a combination of centralized ML and advertiser revenue, the strategy can be implemented by digital platforms outside the social media sector -for example, by search engines and by smartphone operating systems (Zuboff, 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zuboff, 2022 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This narrow focus is limiting our ability to envision what democracy-enhancing regulation might look like because it overlooks the crucial role that social media platforms can play in autocracies, in organizations, and outside corporate control.

    “This narrow focus is limiting our ability to envision what democracy-enhancing regulation might look like because it overlooks the crucial role that social media platforms can play (i) in autocracies, by challenging the status quo; (ii) in organizations, by enabling democratic governance; and (iii) outside the sphere of corporate control, by providing public infrastructure”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    When young people read on social media about low tax rates, drug-free streets, good schools, and reliable healthcare in stable polities led by benevolent autocrats, they begin to wonder whether alternatives to democracy might be worth exploring.

    “So, when they read on social media about low tax rates, drug-free streets, good schools, and reliable healthcare in stable polities led by benevolent autocrats, they begin to wonder whether alternatives to democracy might be worth exploring.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    These democratic benefits of social media can only materialize when digital platforms truly enable free speech, give users equal opportunities to join the conversation independently of socio-economic background, and do not bias participation by exposing some users to harm.

    “These democratic benefits of social media can only materialize when digital platforms truly enable free speech, give users equal opportunities to join the conversation (independently of their socio-economic background), and do not bias participation by exposing some users to harm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In this context, social media platforms have mostly been documenting the growing public frustration with political democracy, while making highly visible some possible alternatives to democratic government.

    “In this context, social media platforms have mostly been documenting the growing public frustration with political democracy, while making highly visible some possible alternatives to democratic government.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In non-Western countries, including Pakistan, Bangladesh, the Philippines, and Turkey, democracy began to recede in the mid-1990s.

    “Meanwhile, in non-Western countries, including Pakistan, Bangladesh, the Philippines, and Turkey, democracy began to recede in the mid-1990s (The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    By explicitly recognizing social media's institutional role in democracies, governments give regulators a legitimate mandate to oversee the industry and act if necessary.

    “By explicitly recognizing social media's institutional role in democracies, governments give regulators a legitimate mandate to oversee the industry and act if necessary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Those exiting democracies do not specifically seek out autocracies, but they no longer view the absence of democratic government as a deal-breaker.

    “While those exiting democracies do not specifically seek out autocracies, they no longer view the absence of democratic government as a deal-breaker, as they certainly would have 30 years ago.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Social media have fostered diversity in the media industry by spawning dozens of platforms with various value propositions.

    “Besides de-concentration, social media have also fostered diversity in the media industry by spawning dozens of platforms with various value propositions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    With taxes at their all-time high since WWII and failing public infrastructure, many among the youth wonder where all the money is going.

    “With taxes at their all-time high since WWII and failing public infrastructure, many among the youth wonder 'where all the money is going' (@Jamie_IF, 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites @Jamie_IF, 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Social media platforms enable the free expression of diverse viewpoints and new ideas in an online environment that lets people cooperate at scale.

    “Social media platforms, now on the forefront, enable the free expression of diverse viewpoints and new ideas in an online environment that lets people cooperate at scale.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Digitally enabled democracy has been on the rise, propelled by initiatives involving platforms, protocols, and software tools.

    “Digitally enabled democracy has been on the rise, propelled by initiatives involving platforms, protocols, and software tools ranging from the more innocuous (e.g., Twitter polls to survey one's followers) to the more radical (e.g., Wikileaks' encrypted drop box to force government transparency).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Certain choices of core technology prefigure certain platform designs, which then make certain business models more competitive and viable.

    “certain choices of core technology prefigure certain platform designs (e.g., Gulati et al., 2026), which then make certain business models more competitive than others, and thus more viable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gulati et al., 2026 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Social trust in the media, the government, and universities has declined since the early 1970s.

    “Indeed, social trust in the media, the government, and universities has declined since the early 1970s.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Other platform configurations can foster democratic engagement by building authority dispersion into their design.

    “Other platform configurations, by contrast, can foster democratic engagement by building authority dispersion into their design”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Comparable US proposals, such as the 2023 Algorithmic Accountability Act, have stalled, with scant evidence of voluntary uptake by US platform corporations.

    “comparable US proposals, such as the 2023 Algorithmic Accountability Act, have stalled, with scant evidence of voluntary uptake by US platform corporations”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites 2023 Algorithmic Accountability Act

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Wealth and income inequality are among the few variables that covary with, and plausibly explain, growing dissatisfaction with democracy.

    “To explain this increasingly lower appeal of democracy, Foa and colleagues need not mention social media, whose growth occurred after 2006; instead, they bring up evidence that, over the long term, 'wealth and income inequality' are 'among the few variables that covary' with, and plausibly explain growing dissatisfaction with democracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Foa et al., 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    Social media platforms can implement alternative strategies to surveillance capitalism.

    “social media platforms can implement alternative strategies, and when they do, critics do not seem concerned with adverse consequences for democracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some attribute the shortcomings of their home countries to democracy itself, in particular on politicians' obsession with short-term re-election rather than buildup of socially valuable infrastructure for future generations.

    “Some even attribute the shortcomings of their home countries to democracy itself -in particular, on politicians' obsession with their short-term re-election, rather than with the buildup of socially valuable infrastructure for future generations (Acemoglu, 2025).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Acemoglu, 2025

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Against longstanding democratic decline, the election of populist leaders actually increases young voters' satisfaction with democracy, but only temporarily.

    “Against this longstanding democratic decline, the election of populist leaders actually increases young voters' satisfaction with democracy, but only temporarily.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Foa et al., 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    To date, it has not been possible to process user behavioural data at scale to serve ads cost-effectively on a decentralized platform powered by a public blockchain.

    “to date, it has not been possible to process user behavioural data at scale to serve ads cost-effectively on a decentralized platform powered by a public blockchain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Social media platforms are fostering new forms of organizational democracy that support authority dispersion in lieu of managerial hierarchies and shareholder primacy.

    “As this section now discusses, social media platforms are fostering new forms of organizational democracy that support authority dispersion in lieu of managerial hierarchies and shareholder primacy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Going forward, nothing guarantees that enough viable platforms will enter and maintain healthy diversity in social media.

    “Yet, going forward, nothing guarantees that enough viable platforms will enter and maintain healthy diversity in social media.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Crouch coined the term 'post-democracy' to describe polities where a cross-partisan elite has gradually formed around shared core beliefs, with political alternance making little difference to voters.

    “Crouch (2004) coined the term 'post-democracy' -again, before the social media era -to describe polities where a cross-partisan elite has gradually formed around shared core beliefs, with political alternance making little difference to voters as a result.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crouch (2004)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In 1995, Robert Putnam diagnosed that citizens in established democracies are questioning the effectiveness of their public institutions and that democratic disarray may be linked to a broad and continuing erosion of civic engagement that began a quarter-century earlier.

    “In 1995, Robert Putnam famously diagnosed that, 'in the established democracies, […] citizens are questioning the effectiveness of their public institutions' and 'there is reason to suspect that this democratic disarray may be linked to a broad and continuing erosion of civic engagement that began a quarter-century ago' (Putnam, 1995, p. 78).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Putnam, 1995 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Political democratization plateaued in the early 1990s and, by the mid-1990s, several Western democracies, including the U.S., were showing signs of political decay, distrust, and declining civic and political engagement.

    “Political democratization plateaued in the early 1990s and, 'by the mid-1990s, several Western democracies, including the U.S., were showing signs of political decay, distrust, and declining civic and political engagement' (Diamond, 2022, p. 163).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Diamond, 2022 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Social media's damaging effects on democracy stem from one specific strategic configuration: the centralized ML platform optimized for third-party advertising (Facebook, TikTok, X, Instagram).

    “social media's damaging effects on democracy stem from one specific strategic configuration, namely, the centralized ML platform optimized for third-party advertising (Facebook, TikTok, X, Instagram).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    A crucial complementor app in an interoperable world is the multihoming client used to cross-post content onto several social media platforms.

    “A crucial complementor app in an interoperable world is the multihoming client used to cross-post content onto several social media platforms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Given pronounced demand heterogeneity, with early and later adopters differing and generations of users clustering by platform, interoperability bridges both platforms and generations, thereby improving social understanding.

    “Given pronounced demand heterogeneity, with early and later adopters differing and generations of users clustering by platform (Rietveld and Eggers, 2018), interoperability thus bridges both platforms and generations, thereby improving social understanding.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rietveld and Eggers, 2018 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    One such business model optimizes for safe usage and free speech, even if it means users must pay a small fee; in this configuration, it is users who decide how to moderate the content in their feed.

    “One such business model optimizes for safe usage and free speech, even if it means users must pay a small fee.In this configuration, it is users who decide how to moderate the content in their feed (e.g., Bluesky, Mastodon, Farcarster, Nostr).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    With pluralism, platforms compete in different ways, using a diversity of core technologies and designs, and in equilibrium a pluralist ecosystem welcomes a diversity of business models.

    “With pluralism, platforms compete in different ways.They use a diversity of core technologies (e.g., ML, blockchain) and a diversity of designs (e.g., centralized and concentrated, à la X; distributed but centralized, à la Discord; distributed and partly decentralized, à la Bluesky; distributed and decentralized, à la Nostr) (see Table I for examples and Vergne, 2020 on the distinction between Dec”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The goal of safe usage can be achieved by leaving decisions about moderation up to the users, shifting the platform towards a {safe usage, free speech} configuration.

    “the goal of safe usage could be achieved by leaving decisions about moderation up to the users, shifting the platform towards a {safe usage, free speech} configuration.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Advertisers expect centralized algorithms that push targeted ads effectively to the most suitable users; to do that, the platform must concentrate authority in the hands of its managers.

    “Advertisers expect centralized algorithms that push targeted ads effectively to the most suitable users.To do that, the platform must concentrate authority in the hands of its managers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Authority dispersion around moderation means a user is free to speak, but never forced to listen to other users and advertisers deemed undesirable.

    “Authority dispersion around moderation means a user is free to speak, but never forced to listen to other users and advertisers deemed undesirable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Interoperability fosters pluralism but does not replace democratic law-making.

    “Interoperability fosters pluralism but does not replace democratic law-making.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In sum, interoperability makes platform size matter less and platform quality matter more, thereby warding off industry concentration and fostering pluralism.

    “In sum, interoperability makes platform size matter less and platform quality matter more, thereby warding off industry concentration and fostering pluralism.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Email exhibits strong network effects: its value rises with the size of the user base; yet open protocols keep those effects from becoming monopoly power by making providers interoperable.

    “Email exhibits strong network effects: its value rises with the size of the user base.Yet open protocols (SMTP/IMAP) keep those effects from becoming monopoly power by making providers interoperable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Their corporate owners have no incentive to let complementor apps 'encourage constructive engagement rather than fragmentation', as this would reduce total user engagement with attention-grabbing, revenue-generating content.

    “their corporate owners have no incentive to let complementor apps 'encourage constructive engagement rather than fragmentation' (Castelló et al., 2025, this issue), as this would reduce total user engagement with attention-grabbing, revenue-generating content.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Castelló et al., 2025

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    No single social media platform can, on its own, deliver all three core benefits (free speech, free usage, safe usage) in a democracy.

    “no single social media platform can, on its own, deliver all three core benefits we expect from a healthy ecosystem in a democracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The three core benefits we expect from a healthy ecosystem in a democracy are free speech, free usage, and safe usage.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The recent realization that the platform oligopoly had become powerful enough to rival state authority has triggered crackdowns aimed at regaining political control, both in the USA and China.

    “The recent realization that the platform oligopoly had become powerful enough to rival state authority has triggered crackdowns aimed at regaining political control, both in the USA (Lopez, 2025) and China (Zhang, 2025).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lopez, 2025

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Zhang, 2025

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It lowers the breakeven point a complementor must hit on any single platform, unlocking capital for innovative social media services that are not worth developing for today's siloed platforms.

    “It lowers the breakeven point a complementor must hit on any single platform, unlocking capital for innovative social media services that are not worth developing for today's siloed platforms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The proposal for an interoperability mandate is technically feasible and has been shown to work in practice in comparable settings.

    “The proposal for an interoperability mandate, aimed at ensuring that users can communicate across platforms, is technically feasible and has been shown to work in practice in comparable settings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    By designing a platform with authority dispersion, each user could decide for themselves which moderation algorithm and content filter to use, resulting in a custom newsfeed suited to the user's safety preferences.

    “By designing a platform with authority dispersion (e.g., Mastodon), each user could decide for themselves which moderation algorithm and content filter to use, resulting in a custom newsfeed suited to the user's safety preferences (e.g., Bluesky).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Third-party merchants expect their paid influencer content to not be censorable by non-paying users; here again, the platform must re-centralize to prevent censorship of sponsored content.

    “Third-party merchants expect their paid influencer content to not be censorable by non-paying users.Here again, the platform must re-centralize to prevent censorship of sponsored content.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The tool 'Polis', built for democratic deliberation, could be used in combination with Facebook and X.com to emphasize the views that users share rather than those that divide them (this is currently impossible due to closed APIs and lack of standardization).

    “the tool 'Polis', built for democratic deliberation, could be used in combination with Facebook and X. com to emphasize the views that users share rather than those that divide them (this is currently impossible due to closed APIs and lack of standardization).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Social media are well suited to interoperable networking: users have a 'local bias' for adopting the service their friends already use rather than the largest platform overall.

    “social media are well suited to interoperable networking: users have a 'local bias' for adopting the service their friends already use rather than the largest platform overall (Lee et al., 2006(Lee et al., , p. 1839)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lee et al., 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Interoperability mandates are not particularly costly, and their cost need not be borne by taxpayers.

    “Interoperability mandates are not particularly costly, and their cost need not be borne by taxpayers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Over the past two decades, a platform oligopoly, controlled by a handful of US and Chinese mega-corporations, has emerged through anticompetitive practices tacitly condoned by both governments for geopolitical gain.

    “Over the past two decades, a platform oligopoly, controlled by a handful of US and Chinese mega-corporations, has emerged through anticompetitive practices tacitly condoned by both governments for geopolitical gain (Zuboff, 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zuboff, 2022 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Early integration is ideal, but industries can add interoperability even at mature stages; the banking sector is a case in point, with 'open banking' mandates having been implemented recently in the UK, Brazil, South Korea, and Hong Kong.

    “Early integration is ideal, but industries can add interoperability even at mature stages.The banking sector is a case in point, with 'open banking' mandates having been implemented recently in the UK, Brazil, South Korea, and Hong Kong, among others (Ziegler, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ziegler, 2021 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    In a freemium model, power users have limited revenue upside and little willingness to pay unless their content gets a visibility advantage; this requires centralization to implement top-down curation tailored to paying customers.

    “In the absence of advertisers and merchants, however, power users (e.g., influencers) have limited revenue upside and little willingness to pay unless their content gets a visibility advantage.This, again, requires centralization to implement top-down curation tailored to paying customers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rietveld, 2018 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The decline in the authority of traditional social institutions began before 1990 and has been growing ever since.

    “the decline in the authority of traditional social institutions began before the year 1990 and has been growing ever since.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fukuyama, 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Three interoperability protocols have already been developed for social media, thus providing a sound technical basis for further standardization.

    “three interoperability protocols have already been developed for social media, thus providing a sound technical basis for further standardization (see Appendix A).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Multihoming clients would represent an entirely new market segment along the social media industry's value chain, where a lot of innovation would happen and a lot of value could be captured by incumbents and new complementors alike.

    “Multihoming clients would represent an entirely new market segment along the social media industry's value chain, where a lot of innovation would happen and a lot of value could be captured by incumbents and new complementors alike.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Without interoperability, the network effects that originally made platforms 'social' are there primarily to preserve the interests of today's dominant platforms.

    “Without interoperability, the network effects that originally made platforms 'social' are there primarily to preserve the interests of today's dominant platforms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Providers need not achieve global scale to remain viable; network effects also accrue at the industry level, and not just within branded platforms.

    “providers need not achieve global scale to remain viable; network effects also accrue at the industry level, and not just within branded platforms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    No regulation can compel a social media platform to deliver free speech, free usage, and safe usage simultaneously.

    “no regulation can compel a social media platform to deliver free speech, free usage, and safe usage simultaneously.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The three core benefits we expect from a healthy ecosystem in a democracy are free speech, free usage, and safe usage.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Today, content creators face high opportunity costs when posting on a nascent service with a small user base and no pre-existing following.

    “Today, content creators face high opportunity costs when posting on a nascent service with a small user base and no pre-existing following.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Where a platform refrains from editorial control, lets users curate their own feeds, and relies on permissionless server infrastructure, it better aligns with the 'common carrier' analogy and can be plausibly viewed as infrastructure within a free 'marketplace for ideas'.

    “Conversely, where a platform refrains from editorial control, lets users curate their own feeds, and relies on permissionless server infrastructure, it better aligns with the 'common carrier' analogy and can be plausibly viewed as infrastructure within a free 'marketplace for ideas'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Social media platforms will self-select into configurations that solve the trilemma if interoperability is mandated.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Free usage is incompatible with full authority dispersion, and that is by design, meaning that regulation cannot change that.

    “free usage is incompatible with full authority dispersion -and that is by design, meaning that regulation cannot change that.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    To optimize for safe usage, heavy-handed moderation is bound to constrain caricature, parody, and pastiche, resulting in a curb on free speech.

    “To optimize for safe usage, we may opt for heavy-handed moderation that is bound to constrain caricature, parody, and pastiche, resulting in a curb on free speech.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Interoperability preserves regulatory flexibility and lets jurisdictions tailor its economic, political, and legal impacts.

    “Interoperability has desirable properties in this respect because it preserves regulatory flexibility and lets jurisdictions tailor its economic, political, and legal impacts (see Appendix A for details).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The {free usage, safe usage} configuration involving heavy platform moderation, as on YouTube, may be more aligned with the 'publisher' analogy than the {safe usage, free speech} configuration exemplified by Mastodon, Bluesky, or Farcaster.

    “The {free usage, safe usage} configuration involving heavy platform moderation, as on YouTube, may be more aligned with the 'publisher' analogy than the {safe usage, free speech} configuration exemplified by Mastodon, Bluesky, or Farcaster.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Social media platforms will self-select into configurations that solve the trilemma if interoperability is mandated.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    For power users such as influencers, brands, and public authorities, the multihoming experience could be simplified by setting up a unified identity across platforms.

    “For power users such as influencers, brands, and public authorities, the multihoming experience could be simplified by setting up a unified identity across platforms”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    To achieve pluralism, it is not sufficient to grant data rights to users; what is needed is social media protocol interoperability, which requires a regulatory mandate for open standards.

    “To achieve pluralism, it is not sufficient to grant data rights to users.What is needed is social media protocol interoperability, which requires a regulatory mandate for open standards.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    By distributing decision-making about curation and moderation, users are free to speak, but never forced to listen.

    “by distributing decision-making about curation and moderation, users are free to speak, but never forced to listen.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    In a pluralist social media industry, any user can find a platform that meets their preferences by offering a viable solution to the trilemma.

    “In a pluralist social media industry, any user can find a platform that meets their preferences by offering a viable solution to the trilemma.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Interoperability neither casts the government as moderator-of-last-resort nor relies on a naïve libertarian bet that industry self-governance will yield a healthy ecosystem.

    “By contrast, interoperability neither casts the government as moderator-of-last-resort nor relies on a naïve libertarian bet that industry self-governance will magically yield a healthy ecosystem.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Easier multihoming (enabled by interoperability) leads to healthier competition and decreases the risk of harmful platform dominance.

    “With multihoming made easier, competition becomes healthier, and the risk of harmful platform dominance decreases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Users will choose to multihome when interoperability makes it easier.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    At this stage of the industry's development, pluralism requires a regulatory mandate for platform interoperability letting new entrants onboard users in a multihoming environment that does not destroy pre-existing network effects.

    “At this stage of the industry's development, pluralism requires a regulatory mandate for platform interoperability letting new entrants onboard users in a multihoming environment that does not destroy pre-existing network effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Social media platforms will self-select into configurations that solve the trilemma if interoperability is mandated.
    • Rests on an assumption: Regulators in large markets are willing and able to mandate interoperability and enforce it.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The competitive playing field is distorted by years of national champion building.

    “To level a competitive playing field distorted by years of national champion building, new platform entrants must be able to compete on merit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Interoperability lets users sample alternatives without materially curtailing current usage, widening their networks as they assess competing offers.

    “By enabling content to flow across platforms and complementor apps, interoperability lets users sample alternatives without materially curtailing current usage, widening their networks as they assess competing offers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    There is little empirical evidence that social media platforms empower the 'wrong' politicians who then degrade democracy.

    “Likewise, the belief that social media platforms empower the 'wrong' politicians who then degrade democracy is hardly supported by empirical evidence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Interoperability resolves the trilemma at the industry level: users can speak and move across platforms, access free or paid options, and curate their own experience without being funnelled into content they do not wish to see.

    “Interoperability resolves the trilemma at the industry level: users can speak and move across platforms, access free or paid options, and curate their own experience without being funnelled into content they do not wish to see.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    An app's native features will never look as good on another app, which preserves product-based competitive advantages; yet, feature parity management enables cross-app network effects, thus boosting the sociality of social media while levelling the competitive playing field.

    “An app's native features will never look as good on another app, which preserves product-based competitive advantages; yet, feature parity management enables cross-app network effects, thus boosting the sociality of social media while levelling the competitive playing field.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Pluralism is radically different from both the self-regulation status quo proposed by Cennamo and Karanović (2025) and the technocratic public-utility model that Castelló et al. (2025) would have the state enforce.

    “Pluralism is radically different from both the self-regulation status quo proposed by Cennamo and Karanović (2025) and the technocratic public-utility model that Castelló et al. (2025) would have the state enforce.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cennamo and Karanović (2025) source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

    • cites Castelló et al. (2025)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Interoperability is needed to give new platforms implementing the fee-based model a chance to onboard users locked in the platform siloes controlled by Alphabet, ByteDance, Meta, and Tencent.

    “To give new platforms implementing this model a chance to onboard users locked in the platform siloes controlled by Alphabet, ByteDance, Meta, and Tencent, interoperability is needed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Regulators in large markets are willing and able to mandate interoperability and enforce it.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Pluralism aligns with liberal democracy understood as a regime of compromise.

    “Pluralism is a fitting organizing principle for social media that aligns with liberal democracy understood as a regime of compromise (Mill, 1865).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mill, 1865

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Interoperability advances democratic pluralism by enabling crossplatform communication and restoring competitive entry without prescribing a single 'correct' platform design, business model, or approach to moderation.

    “It advances democratic pluralism by enabling crossplatform communication and restoring competitive entry -all without prescribing a single 'correct' platform design, business model, or approach to moderation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Interoperability is a necessary lever to realize pluralism.

    “Interoperability is a necessary lever to realize pluralism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Interoperability lets the social media industry as a whole deliver free speech, free usage, and safe usage.

    “Interoperability lets the social media industry as a whole deliver free speech, free usage, and safe usage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Such fee-based economics deter manipulation while appealing to users who value low-noise feeds and privacy.

    “Such economics deter manipulation while appealing to users who value low-noise feeds and privacy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Solving the trilemma can only be done at the industry level by nurturing pluralism.

    “Solving the trilemma can only be done at the industry level, then, by nurturing pluralism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    By connecting cliques of users across platforms, interoperability weakens proprietary siloes and makes digital media truly 'social' again.

    “By connecting cliques of users across platforms, interoperability weakens proprietary siloes and makes digital media truly 'social' again.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Every social media platform faces the same trilemma preventing it from delivering at once the three democratic benefits of free speech, free usage, and safe usage.

    “Due to inherent trade-offs, every social media platform faces the same trilemma preventing it from delivering at once the three democratic benefits of free speech, free usage, and safe usage (see Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Pluralism fosters the competitive coexistence of different kinds of platforms, including services that privilege free speech and safe usage over free usage.

    “Pluralism fosters the competitive coexistence of different kinds of platforms, including services that privilege free speech and safe usage over free usage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In a pluralist industry, three categories of platforms coexist and compete, each one delivering two of three benefits with its own configuration of core technology, platform design, and business model.

    “In a pluralist industry, three categories of platforms coexist and compete, each one delivering two of three benefits with its own configuration of core technology, platform design, and business model (see Table I).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Stronger fact-checking will not solve the problem if people no longer trust fact checkers to begin with.

    “The belief that stronger fact-checking will solve the problem is futile if people no longer trust fact checkers to begin with.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
112 of 112
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No top-down regulation can mitigate the platform-level design limitation (the trilemma).

    “I argue that no top-down regulation can mitigate this design limitation at the platform level, and I propose instead to resolve the trilemma at the industry level by nurturing pluralism in the sector.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Email works seamlessly across clients and providers.

    “Email works seamlessly across clients and providers, and so can social media.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The three core benefits we expect from a healthy ecosystem in a democracy are free speech, free usage, and safe usage.

    “These three goals are referred to as free speech, free usage, and safe usage.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Three open standards for social media exist at scale: ActivityPub, AT Protocol, and DSNP.

    “Currently, three open standards for social media exist at scale: ActivityPub (as used by Mastodon, Misskey, possibly Threads in the future); AT Protocol (as used and developed by Bluesky); and DSNP ('Decentralized Social Networking Protocol', which Project Liberty intended to use in combination with the Frequency blockchain as part of their 'people's bid' to acquire TikTok US).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Users will choose to multihome when interoperability makes it easier.

    “With multihoming made easier, competition becomes healthier, and the risk of harmful platform dominance decreases.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Social media platforms will self-select into configurations that solve the trilemma if interoperability is mandated.

    “As social media platforms self-select into configurations that solve the 'trilemma' described earlier, regulators can calibrate applicable regulations to fit national law and the priorities of elected representatives.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Regulators in large markets are willing and able to mandate interoperability and enforce it.

    “The regulator of a large market sets a deadline by which all social media platforms must implement interoperability based on open standards.”
7 of 7

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Bey H., 2003, T.A.Z.: The Temporary Autonomous Zone, Ontological Anarchy, Poetic Terrorism
  2. Coyer C., 2025, Utah Data Sharing Law Creates Path to Upend Social Media Model
  3. Crouch C., 2004, Post‐Democracy
  4. Durand R., 2013, The Pirate Organization: Lessons from the Fringes of Capitalism
  5. Elad B., 2025, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations Statistics 2025: Market Growth, Governance, and Industry Adoption
  6. Foa R., 2020, Youth and Satisfaction with Democracy: Reversing the Democratic Disconnect?
  7. Hogg L., 2024, Shaping the Future of Social Media with Middleware
  8. Howard J. W., 2024, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  9. Mill J. S., 1865, Considerations on Representative Government by John Stuart Mill
  10. Rediker M., 1987, Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea: Merchant Seamen, Pirates and the Anglo‐American Maritime World, 1700–1750
  11. Slobodian Q., 2023, Crack‐Up Capitalism: Market Radicals and the Dream of a World Without Democracy
  12. The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2024, Democracy Index 2023: Age of Conflict
  13. Vergne J. P., 2024, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 115
  14. World Economic Forum, 2022, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations: Beyond the Hype

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vergne, J. P.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Vergne, J.P.
Venue
Journal of Management Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-12-12
ISSN
  • 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6486
OpenAlex
W7114993990
Cited by
1
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Management Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
Keywords
social media, platform interoperability, platform concentration, organizational democracy, decentralized autonomous organizations, viewpoint diversity, freedom of expression, multihoming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review