Cited by 75Game Theory and Voting SystemsPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionGame Theory and Applications

Digital Dystopia

Tirole, Jean·2021·American Economic Review

Abstract

Autocratic regimes, democratic majorities, private platforms, and religious or professional organizations can achieve social control by managing the flow of information about individuals’ behavior. Bundling the agents’ political, organizational, or religious attitudes with information about their prosocial conduct makes them care about behaviors that they otherwise would not. The incorporation of the individuals’ social graph in their social score further promotes soft control but destroys the social fabric. Both bundling and guilt by association are most effective in a society that has weak ties and is politically docile. (JEL D64, D72, D83, D91, K38, Z13)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.20201214

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social media risks losing their independent voice when dominated by any central power, private or governmental, that could improperly meddle in the 'semi-public spheres' that they provide to society.

    “social media risks losing their independent voice when dominated by any central power, private or governmental, that could improperly meddle in the 'semi-public spheres' that they provide to society (Habermas, 2022, p. 167; see also Tirole, 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tirole, J.
Affiliations
Toulouse School of Economics (TSE) and Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST) (email: )
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2021-06-01
Volume
111
Issue
6
Pages
2007-2048
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206148674
Cited by
75
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • Toulouse Capitole Publications (University Toulouse 1 Capitole) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-EURE-0010)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
Keywords
social control, guilt by association, social scoring, social graphs, prosocial behavior, authoritarian regimes, weak ties, soft control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review