Cited by 113Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsPsychosocial Factors Impacting Youth

Do Personality Traits Moderate Relations Between Psychologically Controlling Parenting and Problem Behavior in Adolescents?

Open access
Mabbe, Elien, Soenens, Bart, Vansteenkiste, Maarten, Van Leeuwen, Karla·2016·Journal of Personality

Abstract

This research examined whether and how adolescents' personality traits moderate associations between psychologically controlling parenting and problem behaviors. On the basis of self‐determination theory, we also examined the mediating role of psychological need frustration in the effects of psychologically controlling parenting. A cross‐sectional study in two samples (N = 423 and 292; Mage = 12.43 and 15.74 years) was conducted. While in Sample 1 both mothers and adolescents provided reports of parenting and problem behavior, Sample 2 relied on adolescent‐reported parenting and mother‐reported problem behavior. Psychologically controlling parenting was related to internalizing and externalizing problems in both samples. Little systematic evidence was obtained for the moderating role of personality, with the exception of a moderating effect of Agreeableness. In both samples, psychological control was unrelated to externalizing problems among adolescents high on Agreeableness. Analyses of Sample 2 showed that associations between psychological control and problem behavior were mediated by psychological need frustration. Adolescent personality plays a modest role as a moderator of associations between psychologically controlling parenting and problem behavior. Frustration of adolescents' basic and universal psychological needs can account for the undermining effects of psychologically controlling parenting. Directions for future research are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jopy.12166

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Big Five personality traits and differences in need strength have not been shown to reliably affect the functional role of need satisfactions on developmental outcomes.

    “Similarly, Big Five personality traits (Mabbe et al. 2016) and differences in need strength (e.g., Sheldon et al. 2001) have not been shown to reliably affect the functional role of need satisfactions on developmental outcomes.”

    From Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions (2020) · cites this paper as Mabbe et al. 2016

    The Primary Analyses report that none of the Big Five traits significantly moderated the association between need frustration and adolescents’ problem behaviors. However, the Methods section says the study measured need frustration rather than need satisfaction, and its outcomes were problem behaviors rather than developmental outcomes generally. The separate claim about need strength is attributed to Sheldon et al., not to this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Psychologically controlling parenting has been found to relate to more internalizing problems irrespective of children's Big Five personality traits but to relate to externalizing problems mainly among children low on agreeableness.

    “Similarly, psychologically controlling parenting (i.e., a specific type of need-thwarting parenting characterized by love withdrawal and guilt-induction) has been found to relate to more internalizing problems irrespective of children's Big Five personality traits but to relate to externalizing problems mainly among children low on agreeableness (Mabbe et al. 2016).”

    From Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions (2020) · cites this paper as Mabbe et al. 2016

    The Primary Analyses (page not provided) find that psychological control was related to externalizing problems among adolescents low in Agreeableness, but not those high in Agreeableness. The claim overstates the internalizing finding: in Sample 1, mother-reported psychological control was unrelated to internalizing problems among adolescents high in Extraversion or Emotional Stability, although adolescent-reported control showed no such moderation. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Basic psychological needs are universally applicable and operative, and thus relevant for individuals regardless of demographic characteristics, personality, or cultural background.

    “If psychological needs are inherent, they should be universally applicable and operative (Ryan and Deci 2017), and thus relevant for individuals regardless of their demographic characteristics (e.g., age, nationality, gender; Henning et al. 2019), personality (e.g., Mabbe et al. 2016), or cultural background (e.g., Benita et al. 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [14]14. Caspi, A., & Shiner, R. L. (2006). Personality development. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 300-365). New York: Wiley.
  2. [30]30. Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In P. H. Mussen & E. M. Hetherington, Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socializa- tion, personality, and social development (4th ed., pp. 1-101). New York: Wiley.
  3. [34]34. Muth en, L. K., & Muth en, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muth en & Muth en.
  4. [37]37. Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. (1998). Temperament. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psy- chology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 105-176). New York: Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mabbe, E., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Van Leeuwen, K.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • KULeuven
Corresponding author
Mabbe, Elien
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-09
Volume
84
Issue
3
Pages
381-392
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W1907569723
Cited by
113
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
10.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Keywords
psychological control, parenting, adolescent behavior problems, personality traits, agreeableness, need frustration, self-determination theory, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, moderation, mediation
MeSH terms
Problem Behavior, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Authoritarianism, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Personality, Parenting, Personal Autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review