Cited by 364Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentCultural Differences and Values

Let Us Not Throw Out the Baby With the Bathwater: Applying the Principle of Universalism Without Uniformity to Autonomy-Supportive and Controlling Parenting

Open access
Soenens, Bart, Vansteenkiste, Maarten, Van Petegem, Stijn·2015·Child Development Perspectives

Abstract

Socialization scholars differ in how they view parenting processes: On one hand, scholars working from the perspective of the Self-Determination Theory (SDT) underscore the universally growth-promoting role of parenting that is perceived to support autonomy and the universal costs associated with parenting that is perceived as controlling. On the other hand, scholars adopting a more relativistic perspective focus on moderating factors (e.g., personality, culture) that may reduce or even cancel out the benefits of parents' support of autonomy and the costs of controlling parenting. In this article, we apply the principle of universalism without uniformity to this literature and review evidence for this principle. Specifically, we maintain that room for individual differences exists within SDT in children's appraisal of potentially autonomy-supportive and controlling parenting practices, and in the way they cope with controlling parenting. This perspective emphasizes children's active contribution in shaping the socialization process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdep.12103

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]17. Kuczynski, L., & Parkin, M. C. (2007). Agency and bidirectionali- ty in socialization: Interactions, transactions, and relational dialec- tics. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 259-283). New York, NY: Guilford.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Van Petegem, S.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Ghent University
Corresponding author
Soenens, Bart
Venue
Child Development Perspectives
Published
2015-02-18
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
44-49
ISSN
  • 1750-8592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-8606
OpenAlex
W2023904500
Cited by
364
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7
FWCI
14.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
parental autonomy support, controlling parenting, self-determination theory, individual differences, child socialization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review