Cited by 24Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesAction Observation and Synchronization

“Salience network” dysfunction hypothesis in autism spectrum disorders

Open access
Toyomaki, Atsuhito, Murohashi, Harumitsu·2013·Japanese Psychological Research

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by impaired social interaction and communication, as well as repetitive and stereotyped patterns of behavior. Although most patients with ASD show sensory abnormalities such as hyperesthesia and hypoesthesia, its relation to social cognition has not been well studied. Recently, a salience network (SN) dysfunction hypothesis of ASD has been proposed. This neuroscientific hypothesis might explain how a SN integrating external sensory stimuli with internal states mediates interactions between large‐scale networks involved in externally and internally oriented cognitive processing. In the brain of patients with ASD, areas of the SN, including the anterior insula, become dysfunctional, which results in difficulty in operating social cognition and self‐referential processing. Here we discuss the controversial points and future directions of this hypothesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jpr.12012

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Baron-Cohen, S. (2009). Autism: The empathizingsystemizing (E-S) theory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences , 1156 , 68-80.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toyomaki, A., & Murohashi, H.
Affiliations
Hokkaido University (JP)
Corresponding author
Toyomaki, Atsuhito
Venue
Japanese Psychological Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
175-185
ISSN
  • 0021-5368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-5884
OpenAlex
W1575960342
Cited by
24
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Japanese Psychological Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23791306)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, salience network, anterior insula, social cognition, self-referential processing, sensory disturbances, hyperesthesia, numbness, large-scale brain networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review