Cited by 153Sleep and related disordersChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentSleep and Wakefulness Research

A review of sleep disturbance in children and adolescents with anxiety

Brown, Wilson J., Wilkerson, Allison K., Boyd, Stephen J., Dewey, Daniel, Mesa, Franklin, Bunnell, Brian E.·2018·Journal of Sleep Research

Abstract

Summary: The present review examines the relations between sleep disturbance and anxiety in children and adolescents. The review begins with a detailed discussion of normative developmental trends in sleep, and the relation between sleep quality and emotion dysregulation in children. The extant literature on sleep disturbance in clinically anxious children with a focus on subjective versus objective measures of sleep is then summarized in detail. Finally, a review of the reciprocal relationship between sleep and emotion regulation is provided. The available research suggests that sleep disturbance is quite prevalent in children with anxiety disorders, although the directionality of the association between sleep disturbance and anxiety in children remains unclear. Despite this limitation, a reciprocal relationship between sleep quality and anxiety appears to be well established. Research using objective measures of sleep quality (e.g. polysomnography, sleep actigraphy, sleep bruxism) is warranted to better understand this relation. Further, complicating factors such as the environment in which sleep quality is measured, the developmental stage of participants, varying severity of anxiety and the timeframe during which assessment takes place should all be considered when examining sleep disturbance in this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsr.12635

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sleepio (dCBT-I) reduces insomnia severity and improves sleep efficiency, with effect sizes typically in the small-to-moderate range.

    “Widely studied programs such as Sleepio, an automated digital CBT-I platform (dCBT-I), have demonstrated reductions in insomnia severity and improvements in sleep efficiency, with effect sizes typically in the small-to-moderate range [95].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, W. J., Wilkerson, A. K., Boyd, S. J., Dewey, D., Mesa, F., & Bunnell, B. E.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Cincinnati VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Wilson J.
Venue
Journal of Sleep Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-28
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
e12635-e12635
ISSN
  • 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2869
OpenAlex
W2769363357
Cited by
153
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
sleep disorders, childhood anxiety, adolescent anxiety, anxiety disorders, sleep quality, emotion regulation, emotional dysregulation, polysomnography, sleep bruxism
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders, Polysomnography, Actigraphy, Neurodevelopmental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review