Cited by 34Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The effect of dream report collection and dream incorporation on memory consolidation during sleep

Open access
Schoch, Sarah F., Cordi, Maren J., Schredl, Michael, Rasch, Björn·2019·Journal of Sleep Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Collecting dream reports typically requires waking subjects up from their sleep—a method that has been used to study the relationship between dreams and memory consolidation. However, it is unclear whether these awakenings influence sleep‐associated memory consolidation processes. Furthermore, it is unclear how the incorporation of the learning task into dreams is related to memory consolidation. In this study we compared memory performance in a word–picture association learning task after a night with and without awakenings in 22 young and healthy participants. We then examined if the stimuli from the learning task are successfully incorporated into dreams, and if this incorporation is related to the task performance the next morning. We show that while the awakenings impaired both subjective and objective sleep quality, they did not affect sleep‐associated memory consolidation. When dreams were collected during the night by awakenings, memories of the learning task were successfully incorporated into dreams. When dreams were collected in the morning, no incorporations were detected. Task incorporation into non‐rapid eye movement sleep dreams, but not rapid eye movement sleep dreams positively predicted memory performance the next morning. We conclude that the method of awakenings to collect dream reports is suitable and necessary for dream and memory studies. Furthermore, our study suggests that dreams in non‐rapid eye movement rather than rapid eye movement sleep might be related to processes of memory consolidation during sleep.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsr.12754

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When recent experiences appear in dreams, even in fragmentary form, subsequent memory for those experiences is improved.

    “Importantly, when recent experiences appear in dreams, even in fragmentary form, subsequent memory for those experiences is improved.”

    From Constructive episodic simulation in dreams (2022) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Results section ('Relationship between dream incorporation and retention performance'; page unavailable) reports better overnight memory retention when task-related picture categories appeared in NREM dreams, after correcting for chance incorporations. The Methods section ('Sleep and dream analysis'; page unavailable) shows that incorporation could be a broad category rather than a complete replay of an experience. The claim overgeneralizes the finding: the association was not significant for REM dreams, and the study does not establish that dreaming of an experience causes improved memory for that particular experience. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Schoch, S. F., Cordi, M. J., Schredl, M., & Rasch, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Fribourg (CH)
Corresponding author
Rasch, Björn
Venue
Journal of Sleep Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-08
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
e12754-e12754
ISSN
  • 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2869
OpenAlex
W2951204969
Cited by
34
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (SNF 100014_162388, P0ZHP1_178697)
  • H2020 European Research Council (677875)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
dream narrative, memory consolidation, sleep, NREM sleep, REM sleep, sleep quality, dream content
MeSH terms
Memory Consolidation, Adult, Dreams, Female, Humans, Male, Sleep, Polysomnography, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review