Cited by 33Sleep and related disordersImpact of Technology on AdolescentsCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Association between quality of sleep and screen time during the COVID‐19 outbreak among adolescents in the United Arab Emirates

Open access
Bani‐Issa, Wegdan, Radwan, Hadia, Saqan, Roba, Hijazi, Heba, Fakhry, Randa, Alameddine, Mohamad, Naja, Farah, Ibrahim, Ali +3 more·2023·Journal of Sleep Research

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic had a major impact on people of all ages. Adolescents' exposure to online learning is linked to excessive screen time on digital devices, which leads to poor sleep quality. This study aimed to investigate the association between screen time on different electronic devices and sleep quality among adolescents in the United Arab Emirates. This study was based on a self-reported questionnaire, which was administered online to school-aged adolescents (aged 12-19 years). The multicomponent questionnaire collected information on sociodemographic characteristics, sleep quality using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and screen time (minutes) on TV, TV-connected devices, laptops, smartphones, and tablets on weekdays, weeknight, and weekends using the Screen Time Questionnaire (STQ). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors correlated with poor sleep quality. A total of 1720 adolescents were recruited from private and public schools (mean age 14.6 ± 1.97 years). The mean PSQI score was 8.09 ± 3.37, and 74.3% of participants reported poor sleep (cutoff score >5). Mean scores were highest for the sleep latency (1.85 ± 0.97) and sleep disturbance (1.56 ± 0.62) domains. The highest STQ score was observed for smartphones, with a median screen time of 420 min on weekdays and 300 min on weekends. Screen time related to smartphones on weekends (p = 0.003) and increased screen time in bed (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with poor sleep. Our results confirmed the correlation between sleep and screen time in adolescents. The results may inform educational polices that target screen time and sleep among adolescents during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsr.13666

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect size of the hypothesis was between 0.101 and 0.168, indicating a medium effect size.

    “The results show that the effect size of the hypothesis was between 0.101 and 0.168, indicating that there was a medium effect size (21, 46).”

    From Relationship of screen time with anxiety, depression, and sleep quality among adolescents: a cross-sectional study (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Data analysis section (2.7; page unavailable) describes regression analyses and significance testing, while the Results section (3.5; page unavailable) reports regression coefficients and p-values. Neither gives an effect-size range of 0.101–0.168 or classifies it as medium; searches for those numbers and effect-size terminology found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Bootstrap analysis found that the confidence interval was less than 1, indicating that discriminant validity was established.

    “However, further analysis was performed using a bootstrap, and it was found that the confidence interval was less than 1, indicating that the discriminant validity was established (21).”

    From Relationship of screen time with anxiety, depression, and sleep quality among adolescents: a cross-sectional study (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Data analysis section (2.7; page unavailable) describes simple and multiple linear regression, while the pilot results (3.1; page unavailable) report Cronbach’s alpha for reliability. Searches for “bootstrap” and “discriminant validity” found no passage reporting a bootstrapped confidence interval below 1 or a discriminant-validity conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. American Psychological Association . (2019). Alvord Digital Guidelines. American Psychological Association; Available from: https://www.apa.org/topics/healthy-technology-use-children [Google Scholar]
  2. Buysse, D. J. , Reynolds, C. F., III , Monk, T. H. , Hoch, C. C. , Yeager, A. L. , & Kupfer, D. J. (1991). Quantification of subjective sleep quality in healthy elderly men and women using the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI). Sleep, 14(4), 331–338. 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  3. Khodami, M. A. , Seif, M. H. , Koochakzadeh, R. S. , Fathi, R. , & Kaur, H. (2021). Perceived stress, emotion regulation and quality of life during the COVID‐19 outbreak: A multi‐cultural online survey. In Annales Médico‐Psychologiques, Revue Psychiatrique. Elsevier. 10.1016/j.amp.2021.02.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  4. Nunnally, J. C. (1994). Psychometric theory 3E. Tata McGraw‐hill education. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bani‐Issa, W., Radwan, H., Saqan, R., Hijazi, H., Fakhry, R., Alameddine, M., Naja, F., Ibrahim, A., Lin, N., Naing, Y. T., & Awad, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Sharjah (AE)
  • Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences Universiti Brunei Darussalam Gadong Brunei
  • Asia Pacific University of Technology & Innovation (MY)
Corresponding author
Bani‐Issa, Wegdan
Venue
Journal of Sleep Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-06-07
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
e13666-e13666
ISSN
  • 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2869
OpenAlex
W4281742090
Cited by
30
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
sleep quality, screen time, adolescents, COVID-19 pandemic, online learning, smartphones, television, sleep latency, sleep disorders, United Arab Emirates
MeSH terms
Screen Time, COVID-19, Sleep Quality, Adolescent, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, United Arab Emirates, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review