The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
LANGUAGE APTITUDE AND GRAMMATICAL DIFFICULTY: An EFL Classroom-Based Study
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between foreign language aptitude and the learning of two English structures defined as easy or difficult to learn. Using a quasiexperimental design, 66 secondary-level learners of English as a foreign language from three intact classes were provided with four hours of instruction on the passive(a difficult structure) and the past progressive(an easy structure). Language aptitude was measured using the LLAMA Aptitude Test (Meara, 2005). Language outcomes were measured with a written grammaticality judgment and an oral production task. The results revealed that one of the aptitude components, grammatical inferencing, contributed to learners’ gains on the passive but not the past progressive on the written measure. Another component of aptitude, associative memory, contributed to learners’ gains on the past progressive on the oral measure. The results provide support for the claim that different components of aptitude contribute to the learning of difficult and easy L2 structures in different ways. There is also support for the proposal that different components of aptitude may be involved at different stages of language acquisition (Skehan, 2002).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Aptitude is more strongly implicated in the learning of more difficult target features compared with easier features.
“Thus, it appears that aptitude is more strongly implicated in the learning of more difficult target features compared with easier features.”
From The role of individual learner differences in explicit language instruction (2024) · cites this paper as Yalçın & Spada, 2016
Citations
Cites
Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x · Cited by 746
Self-citationSome input on the easy/difficult grammar question: An empirical study
COLLINS, L., TROFIMOVICH, P., WHITE, J., CARDOSO, W., & HORST, M. (2009) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00894.x · Cited by 158
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 67
- 10.3758/BF03330466 · DOI
- 10.1075/lllt.35.04gra · DOI
- Hulstijn, 1994, Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal, AILA Review, 11, 97
- 10.1075/lllt.2.13rob · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470756492.ch18 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.system.2012.10.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0272263109090366 · DOI
- Meara, 2005, LLAMA language aptitude tests
- 10.1017/S0272263197003045 · DOI
- 10.1177/014662169001400201 · DOI
- 10.1075/lllt.32.02bul · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1075/lllt.2.06ske · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1191/1362168805lr161oa · DOI · Paper page
- Ellis, 2009, Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching, 27, 10.2307/jj.27195491.6 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263197002064 · DOI
- 10.1177/026553228600300207 · DOI · Paper page
- Dörnyei, 2005, The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition
- Miyake, 1998, Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistics studies on training and retention, 339
- Carroll, 1981, Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude, 83
- DeKeyser, 2000, The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 509, 10.1017/S0272263100004022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00688.x · DOI
- DeKeyser, 1998, Focus on form in classroom language acquisition, 42
- 10.1515/9783110197372.1.99 · DOI
- Housen, 2014, The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 1
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05417.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01176.x · DOI · Paper page
- Kirby, 2010, Passives in first language acquisition: What causes the delay?, University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 16, 109
- 10.1177/0267658312461497 · DOI · Paper page
- Swan, 1995, Practical English usage
- 10.1007/978-3-642-20850-8_4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0272263114000813 · DOI
- Yalçın Ş . (2012). Individual differences and the learning of two grammatical features with Turkish learners of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Canada.
- 10.1037/1089-2680.3.4.292 · DOI
- Schmidt, 1995, Attention and awareness in foreign language learning, 1
- Sasaki, 1996, Second language proficiency, foreign language aptitude, and intelligence
- Field, 2009, Discovering statistics using SPSS Statistics
- 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00712.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S027226310808073X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0272263100010457 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9922.00147 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1515/9783110197372.2.235 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1366728908003416 · DOI
- 10.1177/026765830101700405 · DOI · Paper page
- Révész A. (2007). Focus on form in task-based language teaching: Recasts, task complexity, and L2 learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Columbia: Teachers College.
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12007.x · DOI
- Trofimovich, 2007, Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies, 171
- 10.1111/lang.12011 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139524803 · DOI
- 10.1093/applin/amu072 · DOI
- 10.1177/1362168813519883 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00294.x · DOI · Paper page
- Doughty, 1998, Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, 1
- Li, 2015b, Individual differences, L2 development, and language program administration: From theory to application, 32
- 10.1191/1362168804lr132oa · DOI
- 10.1111/0026-7902.00076 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/applin/amu054 · DOI
- Pimsleur, 1966, The Pimsleur language aptitude battery
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12030.x · DOI
- Sheen, 2007b, Conversational interaction in second language acquisition, 301
- Wesche, 1981, Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude, 119
- 10.1017/S0261444800012799 · DOI · Paper page
- Skehan, 2010, Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 381
- Carroll, 1959, The modern languages aptitude test
- 10.1075/lllt.2.15har · DOI
- 10.1093/applin/ams044 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards a modular language curriculum for using tasks
Ellis, R. (2019) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168818765315 · Cited by 211
The role of individual learner differences in explicit language instruction
Roehr‐Brackin, K., Baranowska, K., Pavlekovic, R., & Scheffler, P. (2024) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12963 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Yalçın, Ş., & Spada, N.
- Venue
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2016-01-07
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 239-263
- ISSN
- 0272-2631
- 1470-1545
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review