Cited by 72Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceFree Will and AgencyEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

Measures of Consciousness

Irvine, Elizabeth·2013·Philosophy Compass

Abstract

Consciousness is now a hot topic in both philosophy and the cognitive sciences, yet there is much controversy over how to measure it. First, it is not clear whether biased subjective reports should be taken as adequate for measuring consciousness, or if more objective measures are required. Ways to benefit from the advantages of both these measures in the form of ‘Type 2’ metacognitive measures are under development, but face criticism. Research into neurophysiological measures of consciousness is potentially very valuable, but often hindered by its dependence on behavioural measures that are themselves controversial. Newer informational measures are theoretically interesting, but as yet not easily applicable, while other measures of consciousness are designed for application in clinical cases (e.g. vegetative state). Although much optimism accompanies research into measures of consciousness, the controversies and methodological problems reviewed here suggest that making progress in this area may be more difficult than is often acknowledged.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/phc3.12016

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Irvine, E.
Affiliations
University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Irvine, Elizabeth
Venue
Philosophy Compass
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02-12
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
285-297
ISSN
1747-9991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1506833703
Cited by
72
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Philosophy Compass (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Keywords
consciousness, consciousness assessment, subjective reports, metacognition, neurophysiological measures, vegetative state, methodological issues

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review