Cited by 45Mental Health Treatment and AccessGender Roles and Identity StudiesPsychology and Mental Health

Public stigma and attitudes toward psychological help-seeking in the United Arab Emirates: The mediational role of self-stigma

Open access
Vally, Zahir, Cody, Brettjet L., Albloshi, Maryam A., Alsheraifi, Safeya N. M.·2018·Perspectives in Psychiatric Care

Abstract

PURPOSE: Scholars argue that public stigma is predictive of self-stigma, and self-stigma is a primary predictor of attitudes toward seeking psychological help (ATPH). This assertion remains undetermined outside of the United States. This study examines a potential mediational model in which internalized stigma was hypothesized to mediate the relationship between public stigma and ATPH using a sample in the United Arab Emirates. DESIGN AND METHODS: Cross-sectional, correlational design; 114 students completed measures of public stigma, self-stigma, and ATPH. FINDINGS: Full mediation occurred. The sample exhibited high levels of both public stigma and self-stigma. Psychology students manifested diminished levels of stigma and more favorable ATPH. Results are discussed in relation to the prevalent cultural and contextual factors. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Stigma reduction campaigns in this locale should target internalized stigma and its associated socio-cultural nuances.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ppc.12282

Cites

58 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Mourshed M, Hediger V, Lambert T. Gulf cooperation council health care: challenges and opportunities. Global Competitiveness Reports. New York, NY: McKinsey & Company; 2006: 55-64
  2. Crocker J, Major B, Steele C. The handbook of social psychology. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, eds. Social Stigma. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill; 1998:504-553.
  3. Mak WW, Chen SX. Illness behaviours among the Chinese. Oxf Handb Chin Psychol. 2010;2:421-439.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vally, Z., Cody, B. L., Albloshi, M. A., & Alsheraifi, S. N. M.
Affiliations
United Arab Emirates University (AE)
Corresponding author
Vally, Zahir
Venue
Perspectives in Psychiatric Care
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-17
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
571-579
ISSN
0031-5990 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802773662
Cited by
45
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perspectives In Psychiatric Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
public stigma, self-stigma, mediation, United Arab Emirates, psychology students, stigma reduction campaigns
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Students, United Arab Emirates, Universities, Young Adult, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review