Cited by 15Mental Health Treatment and AccessDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Can reflecting on personal values online increase positive beliefs about counseling?

Lannin, Daniel G., Vogel, David L., Heath, Patrick J.·2017·Journal of Counseling Psychology

Abstract

This research developed and tested an online values-affirmation exercise to attenuate threat and enhance positive beliefs about counseling among individuals struggling with mental health concerns. There is evidence that reflecting on personal values (values-affirmation) is an effective approach to eliciting self-affirmation-a psychological process that temporarily bolsters self-worth in order to forestall maladaptive, self-protective responses to counseling information. The present study utilized a randomized 2-group between-subjects design to test the effectiveness of a values-affirmation exercise with an online sample (N = 186) of adults who reported struggling with a mental health concern. It was predicted that values-affirmation would reduce threat related to reading mental health information and increase positive beliefs about counseling. Results indicated that those in the values-affirmation condition reported fewer negative emotions such as feeling upset, irritable, hostile, and scared after reading mental health information, indicating that the information was perceived as less threatening. There was also evidence that engaging in values-affirmation was associated with greater anticipated growth in counseling and greater intent to seek counseling, reflecting greater positive beliefs about counseling. Overall, the results suggest that reflecting on personal values may have the potential to enhance the positive effects of online psychoeducation. (PsycINFO Database Recor…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cou0000201

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Converging evidence across developmental stages suggests that motivational enhancement techniques are well-suited for improving socially anxious adults' beliefs about and intentions toward seeking treatment.

    “Thus, converging evidence across developmental stages suggests that motivational enhancement techniques are well-suited for the task of improving socially anxious adults' beliefs about and intentions toward seeking treatment.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lannin, D. G., Vogel, D. L., & Heath, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Illinois State University (US)
  • Iowa State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Published
2017-04
Volume
64
Issue
3
Pages
261-268
ISSN
  • 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2168
OpenAlex
W2586270392
Cited by
15
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
values affirmation, self-affirmation, online psychoeducation, mental health information, threat mitigation, help-seeking intentions, negative emotions, online intervention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Counseling, Culture, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Social Values, Internet, Intention, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review