Cited by 12Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlParasites and Host Interactions

Nodular presentation of Dirofilaria repens infection in a cat mimicking a fibrosarcoma

Manzocchi, Simone, Lendner, Matthias, Piseddu, Eleonora, Sebastiani, Valeria, Morabito, Simona, Daugschies, Arwid, Pantchev, Nikola·2017·Veterinary Clinical Pathology

Abstract

A cat with multiple subcutaneous nodules suggesting a soft tissue sarcoma by physical and computed tomographic examination was diagnosed as being affected by subcutaneous filariosis based on cytologic and ultrasonographic assessments. Nodules were surgically removed and extracted nematodes were identified by PCR as Dirofilaria repens. Furthermore, DNA of Dipetalonema dracunculoides (syn. Acantocheilonema dracunculoides) was detected by PCR, with no evidence of circulating microfilariae. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this represents the first report describing adults of D repens in multiple subcutaneous nodules in a cat. Cytopathologic examination allowed characterization of the parasitic nature of the nodules. Veterinary practitioners should be aware of the possible nodular presentation of D repens in cats and should include D repens in the differential diagnosis of subcutaneous neoformations in the cat.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/vcp.12433

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selamectin administration was not effective in preventing subcutaneous dirofilariosis in one cat.

    “Selamectin administration was not found to be effective in preventing subcutaneous dirofilariosis in one cat, but this apparent failure could have been due to prophylaxis being stopped before the end of the transmission season. 45”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manzocchi, S., Lendner, M., Piseddu, E., Sebastiani, V., Morabito, S., Daugschies, A., & Pantchev, N.
Affiliations
  • Novara Day Lab – IDEXX Laboratories Italia srl Granozzo con Monticello Italy
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • Istituto Veterinario di Novara Granozzo con Monticello Italy
  • IDEXX Laboratories (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Manzocchi, Simone
Venue
Veterinary Clinical Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-12-09
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
158-163
ISSN
  • 0275-6382 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-165X
OpenAlex
W2560851287
Cited by
12
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Clinical Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
Keywords
Dirofilaria repens, cats, subcutaneous nodules, soft tissue sarcoma mimic, differential diagnosis, cytopathology, ultrasonography, surgical excision
MeSH terms
Animals, Cat Diseases, Cats, Dirofilariasis, Female, Fibrosarcoma, Microfilariae, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Dirofilaria repens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review