Cited by 32Wound Healing and TreatmentsAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Substance P enhances EPC mobilization for accelerated wound healing

Um, Jihyun, Jung, Nunggum, Chin, Sukbum, Cho, Younggil, Choi, Sanghyuk, Park, Ki‐Sook·2016·Wound Repair and Regeneration

Abstract

Wound healing is essential for the survival and tissue homeostasis of unicellular and multicellular organisms. The current study demonstrated that the neuropeptide substance P (SP) accelerated the wound healing process, particularly in the skin. Subcutaneous treatment of SP accelerated wound closing, increased the population of α‐smooth muscle actin positive myofibroblasts, and increased extracellular matrix deposition at the wound site. Moreover, SP treatment enhances angiogenesis without a local increase in the expression levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and stromal cell‐derived factor‐1. Importantly, SP treatment increased both the population of circulating endothelial progenitor cells in the peripheral blood and in CD31 positive cells in Matrigel plugs. The tube forming potential of endothelial cells was also enhanced by SP treatment. The results suggested that the subcutaneous injection of SP accelerated the wound healing in the skin via better reconstitution of blood vessels, which possibly followed an increase in the systemic mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells and a more effective assembly of endothelial cells into tubes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/wrr.12403

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Um, J., Jung, N., Chin, S., Cho, Y., Choi, S., & Park, K.
Affiliations
Kyung Hee University (KR)
Corresponding author
Park, Ki‐Sook
Venue
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-02-18
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
402-410
ISSN
  • 1067-1927 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-475X
OpenAlex
W2230911448
Cited by
32
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wound Repair and Regeneration (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2012R1A1A2042265, NRF-2015R1D1A1A09057839)
  • Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI13C1479)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
substance P, wound healing, endothelial progenitor cells, EPC mobilization, angiogenesis, myofibroblasts, extracellular matrix deposition, skin wound closure, neuropeptides, endothelial tube formation, vascular endothelial growth factor, CXCL12
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Movement, Collagen, Disease Models, Animal, Drug Combinations, Extracellular Matrix, Immunohistochemistry, Laminin, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Proteoglycans, Substance P, Wound Healing, Wounds and Injuries, Neurotransmitter Agents, Neovascularization, Physiologic, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Mice, Chemokine CXCL12, Endothelial Progenitor Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review