Cited by 5Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareInfant Development and Preterm Care

Bereavement care immediately after perinatal loss in health care facilities: a scoping review protocol

Roberts, Lisa R., Sarpy, Nancy L., Peters, Judith, Nick, Jan M., Tamares, Shanalee·2022·JBI Evidence Synthesis

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This scoping review will summarize what is known about formal and informal perinatal bereavement care guidelines used in health care facilities before discharge, and map the mental health outcomes of parents against characteristics of the guidelines. INTRODUCTION: Conflicting evidence for bereavement care guidelines, the lack of randomized controlled trials and experimental studies, and older synthesized information with a limited focus or population make synthesis complex. A scoping review will help determine the breadth and depth of the literature. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Sources pertaining to bereavement care guidelines used in health care facilities immediately after perinatal loss (miscarriage, stillbirth, or neonatal death) and measuring parents' mental health outcomes will be included. Sources relating to family members other than parents, perinatal loss occurring outside of a health care facility, and physical care guidelines will be excluded. METHODS: The proposed review will be conducted using the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The team will consider quantitative and qualitative studies, practice guidelines, case reports, expert opinions, systematic reviews, professional organization websites, and gray literature. Databases to be searched will include CINAHL, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science. The earliest empirical study found (1976) will serve as the starting date limit. After pilot testing, the two-step screening process (titles and abstracts, then full-text articles), data will be extracted, collated, and presented in narrative form as well as in tables and diagrams. The results will provide facilities with a broad view of bereavement care to support grieving parents' mental health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11124/jbies-21-00053

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, L. R., Sarpy, N. L., Peters, J., Nick, J. M., & Tamares, S.
Affiliations
Loma Linda University (US)
Corresponding author
Roberts, Lisa R.
Venue
JBI Evidence Synthesis
Published
2021-11-15
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
860-866
ISSN
2689-8381 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3212002416
Cited by
5
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JBI Evidence Synthesis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Scholars Repository - LLU (Loma Linda University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
perinatal loss, miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, grief, healthcare facilities
MeSH terms
Scoping Reviews As Topic, Scoping Reviews as Topic, Bereavement, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Grief, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Review Literature as Topic, Hospice Care, Parturition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review