Cited by 105Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyMuscle metabolism and nutritionAdipose Tissue and Metabolism

Sexual dimorphism of substrate utilization: Differences in skeletal muscle mitochondrial volume density and function

Montero, David, Madsen, Klavs, Meinild‐Lundby, Anne‐Kristine, Edin, Fredrik, Lundby, Carsten·2018·Experimental Physiology

Abstract

New Findings: What is the central question of this study? Females rely to a greater extent than males on fat oxidation during exercise. Whether any difference in skeletal muscle mitochondrial phenotype and oxidative capacity contributes to this sexual dimorphism remains incompletely explored. What is the main finding and its importance? Female prioritization of fat during exercise occurs in parallel to augmented mitochondrial volume density and intrinsic fatty acid and lactate oxidation in skeletal muscle fibres compared with males, independently of aerobic exercise capacity. The enlarged metabolic machinery in skeletal muscle of females is associated with lower body size and leg mass. Fat oxidation during exercise is greater in females than in males. We sought to determine whether sex differences in substrate metabolism are paralleled by distinct skeletal muscle mitochondrial volume density and oxidative capacity. Whole‐body substrate (fat and carbohydrate) utilization during submaximal treadmill running was assessed, and skeletal muscle biopsies were taken to determine mitochondrial volume density and function in healthy young females (n = 12) and males (n = 12) matched by aerobic exercise capacity and exercise performance. Females presented a lower respiratory exchange ratio (0.87 ± 0.04 versus 0.91 ± 0.04, P = 0.023) and whole‐body carbohydrate oxidation (27.8 ± 8.3 versus 35.8 ± 6.5 mg kg−1 min−1, P = 0.027), whereas fat oxidation was higher (8.7 ± 2.8 versus 5.9 ± 2.6 mg kg−1 min−1, P = 0.034) during submaximal exercise compared with males. In skeletal muscle biopsies, females demonstrated augmented mitochondrial volume density (7.51 ± 1.77 versus 5.90 ± 1.72%, P = 0.035) and oxidative capacity for fatty acid [36.6 ± 12.8 versus 24.5 ± 7.3 pmol O 2 s−1 (mg wet weight)−1, P = 0.009] and lactate [71.1 ± 24.4 versus 53.2 ± 14.6 pmol O 2 s−1 (mg wet weight)−1, P = 0.040]. No sex differences in respiratory exchange ratio, whole‐body fat oxidation and skeletal muscle variables were detected when adjusted for anthropometric variables including body mass or leg mass, which were lower in females. In conclusion, female prioritization of fat over carbohydrate oxidation during exercise is underpinned by augmented body size‐related mitochondrial volume density, fatty acid and lactate oxidative capacity in skeletal muscle fibres.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/ep087007

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Significant sex differences and sex hormone influences on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism are apparent.

    “Significant sex differences and sex hormone influences on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism are apparent”
  • Important sex differences exist in mitochondrial function, substrate utilization, insulin sensitivity, immune responses, muscle morphology and body composition, iron metabolism, thermoregulation, hydration, appetite control, and energy availability and endocrine function.

    “important sex differences exist in mitochondrial function [14–16], substrate utilization, and insulin sensitivity [17–24], immune responses [25–28], muscle morphology and body composition [29–32], iron metabolism [33–40], thermoregulation [41–44], hydration [45,46]{Sims, 2008 #55, [47–53], appetite control [54–59], and energy availability and endocrine function [60–65].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montero, D., Madsen, K., Meinild‐Lundby, A., Edin, F., & Lundby, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Lundby, Carsten
Venue
Experimental Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-05-08
Volume
103
Issue
6
Pages
851-859
ISSN
  • 0958-0670 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-445X
OpenAlex
W2795887874
Cited by
105
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5
FWCI
12.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centrum for Idrottsforskning (P2014‐0030)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
Keywords
sexual dimorphism, substrate utilization, fat oxidation, skeletal muscle mitochondria, mitochondrial volume density, oxidative capacity, fatty acid oxidation, lactate oxidation, respiratory exchange ratio, carbohydrate oxidation, aerobic exercise capacity, leg mass, body size, mitochondrial biogenesis, mitochondrial fission and fusion, mitochondrial quality control
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Composition, Exercise Test, Fatty Acids, Female, Humans, Male, Mitochondria, Muscle, Oxidation-Reduction, Sex Characteristics, Exercise, Exercise Tolerance, Muscle Fibers, Skeletal, Lipid Metabolism, Mitochondrial Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review