Cited by 58Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related FatigueImpact of Light on Environment and Health

Functional decoupling of melatonin suppression and circadian phase resetting in humans

Open access
Rahman, Shadab A., St Hilaire, Melissa A., Gronfier, Claude, Chang, Anne‐Marie, Santhi, Nayantara, Czeisler, Charles A., Klerman, Elizabeth B., Lockley, Steven W.·2018·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Key points: There is assumed to be a monotonic association between melatonin suppression and circadian phase resetting induced by light exposure. We tested the association between melatonin suppression and phase resetting in humans. Sixteen young healthy participants received nocturnal bright light (∼9500 lux) exposure of continuous or intermittent patterns, and different durations ranging from 12 min to 6.5 h. Intermittent exposure patterns showed significant phase shifts with disproportionately less melatonin suppression. Each and every bright light stimulus in an intermittent exposure pattern induced a similar degree of melatonin suppression, but did not appear to cause an equal magnitude of phase shift. These results suggest that phase shifts and melatonin suppression are functionally independent such that one cannot be used as a proxy measure of the other. Continuous experimental light exposures show that, in general, the conditions that produce greater melatonin suppression also produce greater phase shift, leading to the assumption that one can be used as a proxy for the other. We tested this association in 16 healthy individuals who participated in a 9‐day inpatient protocol by assessing melatonin suppression and phase resetting in response to a nocturnal light exposure (LE) of different patterns: (i) dim‐light control (<3 lux; n = 6) or (ii) two 12‐min intermittent bright light pulses (IBL) separated by 36 min of darkness (∼9500 lux; n = 10). We compared these results with historical data from additional LE patterns: (i) dim‐light control (<3 lux; n = 11); (ii) single continuous bright light exposure of 12 min ( n = 9), 1.0 h ( n = 10) or 6.5 h ( n = 6); or (iii) an IBL light pattern consisting of six 15‐min pulses with 1.0 h dim‐light recovery intervals between them during a total of 6.5 h ( n = 7). All light exposure groups had significantly greater phase‐delay shifts than the dim‐light control condition ( P < 0.0001). While a monotonic association between melatonin suppression and circadian phase shift was observed, intermittent exposure patterns showed significant phase shifts with disproportionately less melatonin suppression. Each and every IBL stimulus induced a similar degree of melatonin suppression, but did not appear to cause an equal magnitude of phase shift. These results suggest unique specificities in how light‐induced phase shifts and melatonin suppression are mediated such that one cannot be used as a proxy measure of the other.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jp275501

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Melatonin suppression and circadian phase shifts are not arising from a unitary pathway resulting in a direct relationship between them.

    “However, these two effects are not arising from a unitary pathway resulting in a direct relationship between melatonin suppression and phase shifts. There is now accruing evidence that they may be indeed separable [63].”

    From Effects of light on human circadian rhythms, sleep and mood (2019) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Results section reports no significant association between melatonin suppression and phase shifts within any of the six light-exposure conditions. The Discussion concludes that the responses are not closely functionally coupled, supporting the claim that suppression does not directly predict phase shifts. It proposes, but does not establish, a pathway-based explanation; the categorical claim that they do not arise from a unitary pathway goes beyond the evidence. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rahman, S. A., St Hilaire, M. A., Gronfier, C., Chang, A., Santhi, N., Czeisler, C. A., Klerman, E. B., & Lockley, S. W.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology Brigham &amp; Women's Hospital Boston MA USA
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
Corresponding author
Rahman, Shadab A.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-29
Volume
596
Issue
11
Pages
2147-2157
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2806949397
Cited by
58
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Space Biomedical Research Institute (HFP02801, HFP02802)
  • Harvard Catalyst
  • National Institutes of Health (HL094654, P01‐AG09975, R01‐HL114088, RC2‐HL101340‐0, K02‐HD045459, K24‐HL105664, T32‐HL07901, 1UL1 TR001102‐01, 8UL1TR000170‐05, UL1 RR 025758)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAG 5‐3952)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Impact of Light on Environment and Health
Keywords
melatonin suppression, phase lag, nocturnal light exposure, circadian rhythm, light-induced phase shift, dim light, chronobiology
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adolescent, Adult, Circadian Rhythm, Darkness, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Light, Male, Melatonin, Photic Stimulation, Sleep, Young Adult, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review