Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 775

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The variance of sodium current fluctuations at the node of Ranvier

Open access
Sigworth, F. J.·1980·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Single myelinated nerve fibres 12‐17 μm in diameter from Rana temporaria and Rana pipiens were voltage clamped at 2‐5 °C. Potassium currents were blocked by internal Cs+ and external tetraethylammonium ion. Series resistance compensation was employed. 2. Sets of 80‐512 identical, 20 ms depolarizations were applied, with the pulses repeated at intervals of 300‐600 ms. The resulting membrane current records, filtered at 5 kHz, showed record‐to‐record variations of the current on the order of 1%. From each set of records the time course of the mean current and the time course of the variance were calculated. 3. The variance was assumed to arise primarily from two independent sources of current fluctuations: the stochastic gating of sodium channels and the thermal noise background in the voltage clamp. Measurement of the passive properties of the nerve preparation allowed the thermal noise variance to be estimated, and these estimates accounted for the variance observed in the presence of tetrodotoxin and at the reversal potential. 4. After the variance σ 2 was corrected for the contribution from the background, its relationship to the mean current I could be fitted by the function σ 2 = iI—I 2/N expected for N independent channels having one non‐zero conductance level. The single channel currents i corresponded to a single‐channel chord conductance γ = 6·4 ± 0·9 pS (S.D.; n = 14). No significant difference in γ was observed between the two species of frogs. The size of the total population of channels ranged from 20,000 to 46,000. 5. The voltage dependence of i corresponded closely to the form of the instantaneous current—voltage relationship of the sodium conductance, except at the smallest depolarizations. The small values of i at small depolarizations may have resulted from the filtering of high‐frequency components of the fluctuations. 6. It is concluded that sodium channels have only two primary levels of conductance, corresponding to ‘open’ and ‘closed’ states of the channel. 7. The fraction pmax of channels open at the time of the peak conductance was found to be 0·59 ± 0·08 (S.D.; n = 5) and 0·9 ± 0·1 (S.D.; n = 3) for depolarizations to ‐5 and +125 mV, respectively. (50 ms hyperpolarizations to ‐105 mV preceded the depolarizations in each case.) These values are similar to those predicted by Hodgkin‐Huxley kinetics. 8. Fluctuations in the firing threshold of neurones are expected from the stochastic gating of sodium channels. A prediction of the size of these fluctuations based on the measured properties of the channels gives a value of about 1% for the relative spread, which agrees with experimental values in the literature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013426

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sigworth, F. J.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1980-10
Volume
307
Issue
1
Pages
97-129
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2061905631
Cited by
775
References
0
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.