Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 381

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental models of developmental programming: consequences of exposure to an energy rich diet during development

Open access
Armitage, James A., Taylor, Paul D., Poston, Lucilla·2005·The Journal of Physiology
DOI 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.079756
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Studies in both humans and experimental animals addressing the ‘Fetal Origins of Adult Disease’ hypothesis have established a relationship between an adverse intrauterine environment and offspring disease in adult life. This phenomenon, termed ‘fetal programming’ describes a process whereby a stimulus in utero establishes a permanent response in the fetus leading to enhanced susceptibility to later disease. However, the environment, during periods of developmental plasticity in postnatal life, can also ‘programme’ function. Thus, the terms ‘developmental programming’ and the ‘Developmental Origins of Adult Health and Disease’ are preferentially utilized. The ‘Thrifty Phenotype’ hypothesis explained the association between insufficient in utero nutrition and the later development of Type 2 diabetes. Most recently the ‘Predictive Adaptive Response’ hypothesis proposes that the degree of mismatch between the pre‐ and postnatal environments is an important determinant of subsequent disease. Epidemiological studies have indicated that fetal growth restriction correlates with later disease, implying that fetal nutritional deprivation is a strong programming stimulus. This prompted the development of experimental animal models using controlled maternal calorie, protein or macronutrient deficiency during key periods of gestation. However, in many societies, maternal and postnatal nutrition are either sufficient or excessive. Here, we examine findings from a range of nutritional studies examining maternal and/or postnatal nutritional excess. There is supportive evidence from a limited number of studies to test the ‘Predictive Adaptive Response’ hypothesis. These suggest that maternal over‐nutrition is deleterious to the health of offspring and can result in a phenotype of the offspring that is characteristic of metabolic syndrome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.079756

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 381

Metadata

Authors
Armitage, J. A., Taylor, P. D., & Poston, L.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-05
Volume
565
Issue
1
Pages
3-8
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
DOI
10.1113/jphysiol.2004.079756
OpenAlex
W1563149938
Cited by
381
References
49
FWCI
17.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.