Cited by 145Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Vascular adrenergic responsiveness is inversely related to tonic activity of sympathetic vasoconstrictor nerves in humans

Open access
Charkoudian, N., Joyner, M. J., Sokolnicki, L. A., Johnson, C. P., Eisenach, J. H., Dietz, N. M., Curry, T. B., Wallin, B. G.·2006·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

In humans, sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) at rest can vary several‐fold among normotensive individuals with similar blood pressures. We recently showed that a balance exists between SNA and cardiac output, which may contribute to the maintenance of normal blood pressures over the range of resting SNA levels. In the present studies, we assessed whether variability in vascular adrenergic responsiveness has a role in this balance. We tested the hypothesis that forearm vascular responses to noradrenaline (NA) and tyramine (TYR) are related to SNA such that individuals with lower resting SNA have greater adrenergic responsiveness, and vice‐versa. We measured multifibre muscle SNA (MSNA; microneurography), arterial pressure (brachial catheter) and forearm blood flow (plethysmography) in 19 healthy subjects at baseline and during intrabrachial infusions of NA and TYR. Resting MSNA ranged from 6 to 34 bursts min−1, and was inversely related to vasoconstrictor responsiveness to both NA (r= 0.61, P= 0.01) and TYR (r= 0.52, P= 0.02), such that subjects with lower resting MSNA were more responsive to NA and TYR. We conclude that interindividual variability in vascular adrenergic responsiveness contributes to the balance of factors that maintain normal blood pressure in individuals with differing levels of sympathetic neural activity. Further understanding of this balance may have important implications for our understanding of the pathophysiology of hypertension.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In 19 healthy normotensive subjects, resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) was inversely related to forearm vasoconstrictor responsiveness to noradrenaline (NA) and tyramine (TYR). This balance may help maintain similar blood pressures despite wide interindividual differences in sympathetic activity.

Key findings

  • Resting MSNA ranged from 6 to 34 bursts min−1 (9–60 bursts (100 heart beats)−1). Lower resting MSNA was associated with greater vasoconstriction to NA at the middle dose (*r* = 0.61, *P* = 0.01) and to TYR at the middle dose (*r* = 0.52, *P* = 0.02).
  • Relationships were similar at other doses: NA2 *r* = 0.46, *P* = 0.06; NA8 *r* = 0.51, *P* = 0.06; TYR3 *r* = 0.43, *P* = 0.07; TYR12 *r* = 0.47, *P* = 0.04. Absolute ΔFBF analyses were similar, e.g. NA4 *r* = 0.61, *P* = 0.009; TYR6 *r* = 0.49, *P* = 0.03.
  • No relationships were found between resting MSNA and forearm blood flow responses to acetylcholine or sodium nitroprusside at any dose. There was also no relationship of resting MSNA with systolic, diastolic or mean blood pressure, or with baseline forearm blood flow (*r* ≈ 0 for all).
  • In subgroup analysis, for a given arteriovenous NA difference during TYR infusion, vasoconstrictor responses were significantly greater in the low-MSNA subgroup than in the high-MSNA subgroup (*P*ANOVA = 0.02).

Methods

  • Twenty healthy young subjects (6 female, 14 male; age 26 ± 1 years, range 21–33) were studied; one was excluded because a good MSNA recording site was uncertain, leaving *n* = 19 for MSNA analyses. MSNA was measured by microneurography, arterial pressure by brachial catheter, and forearm blood flow by plethysmography at baseline and during intrabrachial infusions of NA, TYR, acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside; propranolol was given before NA and TYR.
  • Four forearm dose–response trials were performed. Vasoconstrictor responses were analyzed as absolute deltas and percentage change in forearm blood flow from baseline. Linear regression assessed relationships between resting MSNA and blood flow responses at individual doses; ANOVA compared low- and high-MSNA subgroups for TYR responses as a function of arteriovenous NA difference.

Limitations

  • The paper states that it does not provide information on individual α-receptor subtypes or cellular mechanisms of the desensitization/buffering seen with higher resting MSNA. It also states that microneurography cannot reliably compare “total” nerve activity among subjects because burst size depends on electrode proximity, which may have contributed to scatter in the regressions. All MSNA data were recorded supine, while most daily time is spent sitting or standing.
  • Evident from the text: the sample was small (*n* = 19; complete venous samples during TYR in 15 subjects; subgroup analysis included 5 low-MSNA and 4 high-MSNA subjects). Drug order was not randomized (ACh, NA, NTP, TYR) to alternate vasodilators and vasoconstrictors. Two NA data points were excluded because of very low forearm blood flow and motion artifact.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.104075

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 15 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Resting MSNA was inversely related to vasoconstrictor responsiveness to noradrenaline, such that subjects with lower resting MSNA were more responsive to noradrenaline.

    “Linear regression analysis showed significant positive relationships between resting MSNA (bursts min−1) and percentage ΔFBF during NA and TYR infusions, such that individuals with lower resting MSNA showed greater vasoconstriction to adrenergic agonists than did those with higher resting MSNA.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    No relationships were found between resting MSNA and the FBF response at any dose of ACh or NTP.

    “No relationships were found between resting MSNA and the FBF response at any dose of ACh or NTP.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    For a given a-v difference in NA during TYR, vasoconstrictor responses were significantly greater in the low MSNA subgroup than in the high MSNA subgroup.

    “for a given a–v difference the vasoconstrictor responses were significantly greater in the low MSNA subgroup (*P*anova= 0.02).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The a-v differences in NA increased significantly with each dose of TYR.

    “The a–v differences in NA increased significantly with each dose of TYR, averaging 35 ± 7 pg ml−1 at baseline, 59 ± 10 pg ml−1 at TYR3, 250 ± 33 pg ml−1 at TYR6 and 658 ± 82 pg ml−1 at TYR12.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Systemic variables such as blood pressure, HR and MSNA did not change significantly during forearm infusions.

    “Systemic variables such as blood pressure, HR and MSNA did not change significantly during forearm infusions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 8
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 12
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Resting MSNA was inversely related to vasoconstrictor responsiveness to tyramine, such that subjects with lower resting MSNA were more responsive to tyramine.

    “Linear regression analysis showed significant positive relationships between resting MSNA (bursts min−1) and percentage ΔFBF during NA and TYR infusions, such that individuals with lower resting MSNA showed greater vasoconstriction to adrenergic agonists than did those with higher resting MSNA.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Resting MSNA ranged from 6 to 34 bursts min−1 (9-60 bursts (100 heart beats)−1) in the 19 healthy subjects.

    “Resting MSNA ranged from 6 to 34 bursts min−1”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “Resting MSNA ranged from 6 to 34 bursts min−1 (9–60 bursts (100 heart beats)−1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Average resting HR was 60 ± 2 beats min−1, resting systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 127 ± 2 and 70 ± 1 mmHg, respectively.

    “Average resting HR was 60 ± 2 beats min−1, resting systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 127 ± 2 and 70 ± 1 mmHg, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Average increases in FBF during ACh and NTP infusions were dose-dependent.

    “Average increases in FBF during ACh (doses in μg (100 ml)−1 min−1) were as follows: ACh2, 11.7 ± 1.8 ml (100 ml) min−1; ACh4, 12.2 ± 1.8 ml (100 ml)−1 min−1; ACh8, 14.9 ± 2.1 ml (100 ml)−1 min−1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A balance exists between sympathetic nerve activity and cardiac output at rest among healthy normotensive individuals, such that individuals with higher MSNA have lower cardiac output and vice versa.

    “We recently showed that a balance exists between SNA and cardiac output, which may contribute to the maintenance of normal blood pressures over the range of resting SNA levels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Charkoudian et al. 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data

    The inverse relationship between MSNA and cardiac output contributes to normal blood pressure regulation and helps explain why individuals with higher MSNA do not necessarily have higher blood pressures.

    “We concluded that this inverse relationship contributes to normal blood pressure regulation and helps to explain why individuals with higher MSNA do not necessarily have higher blood pressures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Charkoudian et al. 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Burke et al. (1977) reported successive increases in MSNA burst frequency going from supine to sitting and standing postures, respectively, with no obvious change in the range of interindividual differences in burst frequency.

    “[Burke *et al.* (1977)](#b1) reported successive increases in MSNA burst frequency going from supine to sitting and standing postures, respectively (with no obvious change in the range of interindividual differences in burst frequency).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Burke et al. (1977)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Our present results do not provide information regarding the roles of individual subtypes of α receptors, which may contribute differently to the balance we report.

    “Our present results do not provide information regarding the roles of individual subtypes of α receptors, which may contribute differently to the balance we report.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Vasoconstrictor responses were analysed both as absolute deltas and as percentage change in FBF from baseline, and results were similar with both approaches.

    “Vasoconstrictor responses were analysed both as absolute deltas and as percentage change in FBF from baseline. Although results were similar with both approaches (see below), we focused on expression of vasoconstrictor responses as percentage of baseline to minimize differences among individuals due to small differences in baseline FBF.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Twenty healthy young subjects (6 female, 14 male) volunteered to participate and gave written informed consent.

    “Twenty healthy young subjects (6 female, 14 male; age, 26 ± 1 years (s.e.m.) (range 21–33); height, 1.75 ± 0.02 m; weight, 74.6 ± 2.9 kg; BMI, 24.4 ± 0.5 kg m−2 (range 19.8–28.1)) volunteered to participate and gave written informed consent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    We are not able to comment on the cellular mechanisms of the desensitization or 'buffering' of adrenergic responsiveness that appears to occur in individuals with higher resting MSNA.

    “Nor are we able to comment on the cellular mechanisms of the desensitization or ‘buffering’ of adrenergic responsiveness that appears to occur in individuals with higher resting MSNA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This limitation may have been one of the contributions to the scatter in the regression analyses we performed.

    “This limitation may have been one of the contributions to the scatter in the regression analyses we performed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All MSNA data were recorded in the supine posture.

    “With regard to blood pressure regulation, it is relevant to the present discussion that all MSNA data were recorded in the supine posture.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    In one subject, it was not clear whether a good recording site was obtained for MSNA, so her data were not included in MSNA analyses.

    “In one individual, it was not clear whether a good site for MSNA recording was found: the subject exhibited MSNA bursts during voluntary apnoea, but displayed no spontaneous bursts during the entire experiment. Since we were not sure whether this represented extremely low resting MSNA (0 bursts min−1) or that we had not found a good recording site, her data were not included in MSNA analyses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The order of the drugs was not randomized.

    “for this reason the order of the drugs was not randomized.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The protocol for this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Mayo Foundation, and the study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

    “The protocol for this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Mayo Foundation, and the study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    We were limited in our ability to compare 'total' nerve activity among subjects (taking into account burst size as well as burst frequency), since burst size is dependent on the proximity of the electrode to the nerve, which varies in an unknown way among individuals.

    “As with all studies involving microneurographic recording of SNA, we were limited in our ability to compare ‘total’ nerve activity among subjects (taking into account burst size as well as burst frequency), since burst size is dependent on the proximity of the electrode to the nerve, which varies in an unknown way among individuals.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
17 of 17
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The vascular responsiveness measured in the forearm to adrenergic agonists is representative of adrenergic responsiveness in other vascular beds that contribute to blood pressure regulation.

    “In summary, we report that an inverse relationship exists between mean levels of resting sympathetic nerve activity and vascular responsiveness to adrenergic agonists.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The inverse association between resting MSNA and vascular adrenergic responsiveness reflects a causal mechanism rather than a mere association.

    “This balance between tonic levels of resting sympathetic activity and adrenergic responsiveness appears to contribute importantly to normal blood pressure regulation”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Charkoudian, N., Joyner, M. J., Sokolnicki, L. A., Johnson, C. P., Eisenach, J. H., Dietz, N. M., Curry, T. B., & Wallin, B. G.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Charkoudian, N.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-04-21
Volume
572
Issue
3
Pages
821-827
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1575064221
Cited by
145
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • National Institutes of Health (n01ns032352-003)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS3 2352, N01 NS032352)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR-00585, M01RR000585)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
sympathetic activity, norepinephrine, tyramine, vasoconstriction, forearm blood flow, blood pressure regulation, interindividual variability, hypertension pathophysiology, cardiac output
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Adult, Arteries, Blood Flow Velocity, Blood Pressure, Female, Forearm, Humans, Male, Norepinephrine, Statistics as Topic, Sympathetic Nervous System, Vasoconstriction, Neurotransmitter Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review