Cited by 442Muscle activation and electromyography studiesHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiovascular and exercise physiology

The variability of muscle nerve sympathetic activity in resting recumbent man

Open access
Sundlöf, Göran, Wallin, B. Gunnar·1977·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Pulse synchronous bursts of multi‐unit sympathetic activity was recorded from median or peroneal muscle nerve fascicles in fourteen subjects resting in the recumbent position. The neural activity was quantitated in terms of burst incidence, i.e. the number of bursts in the mean voltage neurogram/100 heart beats, during successive rest periods of 2‐4 min. 2. For each individual the burst incidence was fairly constant between different rest periods but the mean burst incidence varied widely between individuals, the range being from less than 10 to more than 90 bursts/100 heart beats. 3. Simultaneous double nerve recordings were made on one subject from median and peroneal nerves and on eight subjects from the two peroneal nerves. There was always close similarity between the two records in such experiments regardless of which muscles the nerve fascicles innervated. When analysed separately the difference in burst incidence between the two sides ranged from 0·7 to 5·1 bursts/100 heart beats. The findings suggest that sympathetic neurones destined to skeletal muscles are subjected to a homogenous central drive and that contributions to the activity from ganglionic or segmental sources are of lesser importance. 4. On seven subjects repeated recordings at rest were made with intervals of 3 weeks—21 months between recordings. In each subject mean burst incidences were similar in all recordings (range of differences 0·5‐11·2 bursts/100 heart beats) suggesting an individually constant level of sympathetic activity in muscle nerves. 5. For each individual the variability of burst amplitudes in the mean voltage neurogram was described by burst amplitude spectra. Most subjects had a relatively larger proportion of small than high amplitude bursts, but there was a tendency for more even amplitude distributions in subjects with high burst incidence. The finding may be an indication of interindividual differences in the average number of impulses/burst. 6. It is concluded that the multi‐unit recording technique can be used for comparisons of the level of muscle nerve ‘sympathetic tone’ between different subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012050

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sundlöf, G., & Wallin, B. G.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1977-11
Volume
272
Issue
2
Pages
383-397
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1984113974
Cited by
442
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
multi-unit recording, median nerve, peroneal nerve, interindividual variability, skeletal muscle innervation
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Adult, Humans, Middle Aged, Muscles, Neural Conduction, Peroneal Nerve, Posture, Rest, Sympathetic Nervous System

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review