The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Turning off cortical ensembles stops striatal Up states and elicits phase perturbations in cortical and striatal slow oscillations in rat in vivo
Open accessAbstract
In vivo, cortical neurons and striatal medium spiny neurons (MSN) display robust subthreshold depolarizations (Up states) during which they are enabled to fire action potentials. In the cortex, Up states are believed to occur simultaneously in a neuronal ensemble and to be sustained by local network interactions. It is known that MSN are impelled into the Up state by extra‐striatal (primarily cortical) inputs, but the mechanisms that sustain and determine the end of striatal Up states are still debated. Furthermore, it has not been established if brisk perturbations of ongoing cortical oscillations alter rhythmic transitions between Up and Down states in striatal neurons. Here we report that MSN Up states terminate abruptly when persistent activity in cortical ensembles providing afferents to a given striatal region is turned off by local electrical stimulation or ends spontaneously. In addition, we found that phase perturbations in MSN membrane potential slow oscillations induced by cortical stimulation replicate the stimulus‐induced dynamics of spiking activity in cortical ensembles. Overall, these results suggest that striatal Up states are single‐cell subthreshold representations of episodes of persistent spiking in cortical ensembles. A precise spatial and temporal alignment between episodes of cortical persistent activity and striatal Up states would allow MSN to detect specific cortical inputs embedded within a more general cortical signal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Discrete-Time Signal Processing
Oppenheim, A. V., & Schafer, R. W. (1989) · Cited by 11,775
Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks
Buzsáki, G., & Draguhn, A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099745 · Cited by 6,576
Discrete-time Signal Processing
Williamson, D. (1999) · Advanced Textbooks in Control and Signal Processing · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0541-1 · Cited by 4,858
The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration
Varela, F., Lachaux, J.-P., Rodriguez, E., & Martinerie, J. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35067550 · Cited by 4,761
AChE-stained horizontal sections of the rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates
Paxinos, G., Watson, C. R. R., & Emson, P. C. (1980) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/0165-0270(80)90021-7 · Cited by 4,497
Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing
Engel, A. K., Fries, P., & Singer, W. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35094565 · Cited by 3,454
Statistical Analysis of Circular Data.
Lange, N., & Fisher, N. I. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291098 · Cited by 2,146
Meyer, Y. (1993) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623820 · Cited by 2,034
Statistical Analysis of Circular Data
Fisher, N. I. (1993) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511564345 · Cited by 1,670
Dynamic Brain Sources of Visual Evoked Responses
Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Jung, T.-P., Enghoff, S., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066168 · Cited by 1,630
Cited by
Cholinergic interneuron characteristics and nicotinic properties in the striatum
Zhou, F., Wilson, C. J., & Dani, J. A. (2002) · Journal of Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/neu.10150 · Cited by 444
Levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: Current controversies
Olanow, C. W., Agid, Y., Mizuno, Y., Albanese, A., Bonucelli, U., Damier, P., De Yebenes, J., Gershanik, O., Guttman, M., Grandas, F., et al. (2004) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.20243 · Cited by 370
Gaspar, P., Bloch, B., & Le Moine, C. (1995) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.1995.tb01092.x · Cited by 323
di Marzo, V., Hill, M. P., Bisogno, T., Crossman, A. R., & Brotchie, J. M. (2000) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fasebj.14.10.1432 · Cited by 303
Acetylcholine–Dopamine Interactions in the Pathophysiology and Treatment of CNS Disorders
Lester, D. B., Rogers, T. D., & Blaha, C. D. (2010) · CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00142.x · Cited by 259
Pathophysiology of Parkinson's Disease: The MPTP Primate Model of the Human Disorder
WICHMANN, T., & DeLONG, M. R. (2003) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07477.x · Cited by 255
Schmidt, H. D., Anderson, S. M., & Pierce, R. C. (2006) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04524.x · Cited by 119
Helicobacter pylori infection and motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson's disease
Lee, W. Y., Yoon, W. T., Shin, H. Y., Jeon, S. H., & Rhee, P. (2008) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.22190 · Cited by 110
Striatal structure and function in mood disorders: a comprehensive review
Marchand, W. R., & Yurgelun‐Todd, D. (2010) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2010.00874.x · Cited by 91
Joyce, J. N. (2001) · Synapse · doi:10.1002/syn.1035 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Kasanetz, F., Riquelme, L. A., O'Donnell, P., & Murer, M. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-11-08
- Volume
- 577
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-113
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1568768559
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.