Cited by 18Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementOptical Coherence Tomography Applications

Quantifying the confounding effect of pigmentation on measured skin tissue optical properties: a comparison of colorimetry with spatial frequency domain imaging

Open access
Phan, Thinh, Rowland, Rebecca A., Ponticorvo, Adrien, Le, Binh C., Sharif, Seyed A., Kennedy, Gordon T., Wilson, Robert H., Durkin, Anthony J.·2022·Journal of Biomedical Optics

Abstract

Significance: Spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) is a wide-field diffuse optical imaging technique for separately quantifying tissue reduced scattering (μs ′ ) and absorption (μa) coefficients at multiple wavelengths, providing wide potential utility for clinical applications such as burn wound characterization and cancer detection. However, measured μs ′ and μa can be confounded by absorption from melanin in patients with highly pigmented skin. This issue arises because epidermal melanin is highly absorbing for visible wavelengths and standard homogeneous light–tissue interaction models do not properly account for this complexity. Tristimulus colorimetry (which quantifies pigmentation using the L * “lightness” parameter) can provide a point of comparison between μa, μs ′ , and skin pigmentation. Aim: We systematically compare SFDI and colorimetry parameters to quantify confounding effects of pigmentation on measured skin μs ′ and μa. We assess the correlation between SFDI and colorimetry parameters as a function of wavelength. Approach: μs ′ and μa from the palm and ventral forearm were measured for 15 healthy subjects with a wide range of skin pigmentation levels (Fitzpatrick types I to VI) using a Reflect RS® (Modulim, Inc., Irvine, California) SFDI instrument (eight wavelengths, 471 to 851 nm). L * was measured using a Chroma Meter CR-400 (Konica Minolta Sensing, Inc., Tokyo). Linear correlation coefficients were calculated between L * and μs ′ and between L * and μa at all wavelengths. Results: For the ventral forearm, strong linear correlations between measured L * and μs ′ values were observed at shorter wavelengths (R > 0.92 at ≤659 nm), where absorption from melanin confounded the measured μs ′ . These correlations were weaker for the palm (R < 0.59 at ≤659 nm), which has less melanin than the forearm. Similar relationships were observed between L * and μa. Conclusions: We quantified the effects of epidermal melanin on skin μs ′ and μa measured with SFDI. This information may help characterize and correct pigmentation-related inaccuracies in SFDI skin measurements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/1.jbo.27.3.036002

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phan, T., Rowland, R. A., Ponticorvo, A., Le, B. C., Sharif, S. A., Kennedy, G. T., Wilson, R. H., & Durkin, A. J.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Phan, Thinh
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Optics
Published
2022-03-23
Volume
27
Issue
03
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 1083-3668 (ISSN-L)
  • 1560-2281
OpenAlex
W4221041716
Cited by
18
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Optics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R21AG06600, P41EB015890, R01GM108634)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (2R01GM108634-05A1)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-20-1-0052)
  • National Institutes of Health (P41EB015890, R01GM108634)
  • NIH (P41EB015890)
  • NIH/NIBIB (P41EB015890)
  • Beckman Foundation and the NIH (P41EB015890)
  • NIH (NIBIB) Laser Microbeam and Medical Program (P41EB015890)
  • NIBIB Biomedical Technology Research Center LAMMP (P41EB015890)
  • NIH NIBIB Biomedical Technology Research Center LAMMP (P41EB015890)
  • NIH/NIBIB funded LAMMP (P41EB015890)
  • US National Institutes of Health (P41EB015890)
  • Arnold &amp; Mabel Beckman Foundation (P41EB015890)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging Bioengineering (P41EB015890)
  • NIH NIBIB (P41EB015890)
  • NIH/NIGMS (R01GM108634)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Coherence Tomography Applications
Keywords
skin pigmentation, epidermal melanin, spatial frequency domain imaging, diffuse optical imaging, reduced scattering coefficient, absorption coefficient, tristimulus colorimetry, Fitzpatrick skin type, wavelength dependence
MeSH terms
Colorimetry, Epidermis, Humans, Skin, Skin Pigmentation, Optical Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review