Cited by 84Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiology

The Effects of Carbohydrate Loading on Muscle Glycogen Content and Cycling Performance

Rauch, Laurie H.G., Rodger, Ian, Wilson, Gary R., Belonje, Judy D., Dennis, Steven C., Noakes, Timothy D., Hawley, John A.·1995·International Journal of Sport Nutrition

Abstract

This study compared the effects of supplementing the normal diets of 8 endurance-trained cyclists with additional carbohydrate (CHO), in the form of potato starch, for 3 days on muscle glycogen utilization and performance during a 3-hr cycle ride. On two occasions prior to the trial, the subjects ingested in random order either their normal CHO intake of 6.15 ± 0.23 g/kg body mass/day or a high-CHO diet of 10.52 ± 0.57 g/kg body mass/day. The trial consisted of 2 hr of cycling at ~75% of with five 60-s sprints at 100% at 20-min intervals, followed by a 60-min performance ride. Increasing CHO intake by 72 ± 9% for 3 days prior to the trial elevated preexercise muscle glycogen contents, improved power output, and extended the distance covered in 1 hr. Muscle glycogen contents were similar at the end of the 3-hr trial, indicating a greater utilization of glycogen when subjects were CHO loaded, which may have been responsible for their improved cycling performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijsn.5.1.25

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CHO loading using a similar pattern and amount of carbohydrate intake during the mid-luteal phase fails to change resting muscle glycogen concentrations or only documents a modest increase of 13%, compared to what is generally reported for male athletes (18-47%) or female athletes during the follicular phase (17-31%).

    “CHO loading using a similar pattern and amount of carbohydrate intake during the mid-luteal (ML) phase failed to change resting muscle glycogen concentrations [182] or only documented a modest increase (13%) [186] compared to what is generally reported for male athletes (18–47%) [185,187–191] or female athletes during the follicular phase (17–31%) [184,185].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rauch, L. H. G., Rodger, I., Wilson, G. R., Belonje, J. D., Dennis, S. C., Noakes, T. D., & Hawley, J. A.
Affiliations
South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
Venue
International Journal of Sport Nutrition
Published
1995-03
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
25-36
ISSN
1050-1606 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161733217
Cited by
84
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sport Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
carbohydrate loading, muscle glycogen, cycling performance, endurance cyclists, potato starch, high-carbohydrate diet, glycogen utilization, output power, endurance exercise
MeSH terms
Adult, Bicycling, Blood Glucose, Dietary Carbohydrates, Glycogen, Humans, Lactates, Male, Solanum tuberosum, Starch, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review