Cited by 76Sports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutritionCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Carbohydrate Loading and Female Endurance Athletes: Effect of Menstrual-Cycle Phase

Open access
McLay, Rebecca T., Thomson, Christine D., Williams, Sheila M., Rehrer, Nancy J.·2007·International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

Abstract

This study compared 3 d of carbohydrate loading (CHOL; 8.4 g·kg−1·d−1 carbohydrate) in female eumenorrheic athletes with 3 d of an isoenergetic normal diet (NORM; 5.2 g·kg−1·d−1 carbohydrate) and examined the effect of menstrual-cycle phase on performance, muscle-glycogen concentration [glyc], and substrate utilization. Nine moderately trained eumenorrheic women cycled in an intermittent protocol varying in intensity from 45% to 75% VO 2max for 75 min, followed by a 16-km time trial at the midfollicular (MF) and midluteal (ML) phases of the menstrual cycle on NORM and CHOL. Time-trial performance was not affected by diet (CHOL 26.10 ± 1.04 min, NORM 26.16 ± 1.35 min; P = 0.494) or menstrual-cycle phase (MF 26.05 ± 1.10 min, ML 26.23 ± 1.33 min; P = 0.370). Resting [glyc] was lowest in the MF phase after NORM (575 ± 145 mmol·kg−1·dw−1), compared with the MF phase after CHOL (728 mmol·kg−1·dw−1) and the ML phase after CHOL and NORM (756 and 771 mmol·kg−1·dw−1, respectively). No effect of phase on substrate utilization during exercise was observed. These data support previous observations of greater resting [glyc] in the ML than the MF phase of the menstrual cycle and suggest that lower glycogen storage in the MF phase can be overcome by carbohydrate loading.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijsnem.17.2.189

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CHO loading (8.4-9 g CHO/kg BW/day) in the mid-luteal phase results in no change to a small increase (13%) in muscle glycogen, which could potentially enhance performance.

    “To that end, CHO loading (8.4–9 g CHO/kg BW/day) in the mid-luteal phase has resulted in no change to a small increase (13%) in muscle glycogen, which could potentially enhance performance [57,58].”

    From Considerations of Low Carbohydrate Availability (LCA) to Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S) in Female Endurance Athletes: A Narrative Review (2023) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Muscle-Glycogen Measurements section reports essentially no increase in mid-luteal glycogen after loading (756 versus 771 mmol/kg dry weight), and the Menstrual-Cycle Phase and Resting Muscle Glycogen section reports another study’s 13% increase. This paper tested 8.4, not 9, g/kg/day. Its Exercise Performance discussion describes a possible link to improved endurance in that other study, while its own trial found no performance improvement. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CHO loading during the mid-follicular phase results in a 17-31% improvement in muscle glycogen but not performance.

    “However, CHO loading during the mid-follicular phase has resulted in a 17–31% improvement in muscle glycogen but not performance [58,59,60].”
  • Female athletes using COCs have significantly higher oxidative stress than non-COC user counterparts irrespective of lifestyle habits.

    “with significantly higher oxidative stress in female athletes using COCs than their non-COC user counterparts irrespective of lifestyle habits [181].”

    From International society of sports nutrition position stand: nutritional concerns of the female athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [181]

    The Subjects section states that none of the nine athletes had taken oral contraceptives for at least six months, so this study did not compare COC users with nonusers. Searches for oxidative stress and COC-related terms found passages about exercise substrate oxidation, not oxidative stress or a comparison irrespective of lifestyle habits; no page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Evidence indicated no sex differences in the ability to synthesise glycogen.

    “Evidence indicated no sex differences in the ability to synthesise glycogen [86].”

    From Regulation of Energy Substrate Metabolism in Endurance Exercise (2021) · cites this paper as [86]

    The Muscle-Glycogen Measurements and Summary sections report glycogen storage in female athletes across menstrual-cycle phases and diets, but do not compare women with men. A References entry names a study titled “Muscle glycogen supercompensation: absence of a gender-related difference”; that title alone does not establish that this paper reports the claimed sex comparison. Searches for sex and gender differences in glycogen synthesis found no passage addressing it. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Marieb, E.N. The reproductive system. In: Human Anatomy and Physiology, E.N. Marieb. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings Science Publishing, 1998, pp. 1056- 1061.
  2. McArdle, W.D., F.I. Katch, and V.L. Katch. Human energy expenditure during rest and physical activity. In: Exercise Physiology: Energy, Nutrition and Human Performance (5th ed.), W.D. McArdle, F.I. Katch, and V.L. Katch. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001, pp. 187-200.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McLay, R. T., Thomson, C. D., Williams, S. M., & Rehrer, N. J.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Venue
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Published
2007-04
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
189-205
ISSN
  • 1526-484X (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2742
OpenAlex
W127280637
Cited by
76
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
carbohydrate loading, menstrual cycle phases, female endurance athletes, muscle glycogen, time trial performance, substrate utilization, eumenorrhea, exercise performance, glycogen storage
MeSH terms
Adult, Dietary Carbohydrates, Energy Metabolism, Female, Glycogen, Humans, Menstrual Cycle, Physical Endurance, Muscle, Skeletal, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review