Cited by 297Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Activity-Monitor Accuracy in Measuring Step Number and Cadence in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Grant, P. Margaret, Dall, Philippa M., Mitchell, Sarah L., Granat, Malcolm H.·2008·Journal of Aging and Physical Activity

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of the acti vPAL physical activity monitor in measuring step number and cadence in older adults. Two pedometers (New-Lifestyles Digi-Walker SW-200 and New-Lifestyles NL-2000) used in clinical practice to count steps were simultaneously evaluated. Observation was the criterion measure. Twenty-one participants (65-87 yr old) recruited from community-based exercise classes walked on a treadmill at 5 speeds (0.67, 0.90, 1.12, 1.33, and 1.56 m/s) and outdoors at 3 self-selected speeds (slow, normal, and fast). The absolute percentage error of the ac ti v PAL was <1% for all treadmill and outdoor conditions for measuring steps and cadence. With the exception of the slowest treadmill speed, the NL-2000 error was <2%. The SW-200 was the least accurate device, particularly at slower walking speeds. The ac tivPAL monitor accurately recorded step number and cadence. Combined with its ability to identify primary postures, the activPAL might be a useful and versatile device for measuring activity in older adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/japa.16.2.201

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grant, P. M., Dall, P. M., Mitchell, S. L., & Granat, M. H.
Affiliations
Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
Venue
Journal of Aging and Physical Activity
Published
2008-04
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
201-214
ISSN
  • 1063-8652 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-267X
OpenAlex
W2125871320
Cited by
297
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 18
FWCI
7.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Aging and Physical Activity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Glasgow Caledonian University
  • University of Glasgow
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
activPAL, pedometers, step count accuracy, older adults, community-dwelling older adults, walking speed, treadmill walking, outdoor walking, physical activity monitoring, posture recognition
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Gait, Humans, Male, Posture, Reproducibility of Results, Exercise, Walking, Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review