CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 135

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-dimensional quantum cloning and applications to quantum hacking

Bouchard, Frédéric, Fickler, Robert, Boyd, Robert W., Karimi, Ebrahim·2017·Science Advances
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1601915PMC PMC5291699
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Quantum cloning machines are experimentally realized, giving insight into high-dimensional quantum cryptography.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.1601915

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although tritters have been used to demonstrate quantum features in the two-photon regime, only recently have three photon HOM coalescences been observed.

    “Although tritters have been used to demonstrate quantum features in the two-photon regime [138,142,143], only recently have three photon HOM coalescences been observed [141,144].”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [143]

    The citation is attached to the claim about observed three-photon HOM coalescence. The Results (Fig. 1) describe HOM coalescence curves for two photons, and Materials and Methods specifies a two-photon interference experiment at a 50:50 beam splitter; this paper reports a two-photon observation, not a three-photon one. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.127902 · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.1402365111 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nphys1996 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1088/1367-2630/18/5/053013 · DOI
  5. 10.1088/1367-2630/17/3/033033 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nphys607 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0375-9601(99)00099-7 · DOI
  8. 10.1126/science.1068972 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.047902 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.214 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.073602 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.032313 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.047901 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.physleta.2004.01.063 · DOI
  15. 10.1142/S0219749910006502 · DOI
  16. A. Klappenecker M. Rötteler Constructions of mutually unbiased bases in Finite Fields and Applications (Springer 2004) pp. 137–144. · DOI · Paper page
  17. C. H. Bennett G. Brassard Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing paper presented at the International Conference on Computers Systems and Signal Processing Bangalore India 1984.
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.030406 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.173601 · DOI
  20. 10.1088/1367-2630/9/9/318 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.022317 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bouchard, F., Fickler, R., Boyd, R. W., & Karimi, E.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, University of Ottawa, 25 Templeton Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada.
ORCID
Venue
Science Advances
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Published
2017-02-03
Volume
3
Issue
2
ISSN
2375-2548
DOI
10.1126/sciadv.1601915
PMC
PMC5291699
Cited by
135
References
5
Language
en
Funders
  • Canada Research Chairs (ID0E55AG13851)
  • Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada (ID0EFGBG13852)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (ID0ENLBG13853)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review