Cited by 10Human-Animal Interaction StudiesGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

A missense mutation in RRM1 contributes to animal tameness

Open access
Dou, Mingle, Li, Ming, Zheng, Zhuqing, Chen, Qiuming, Wu, Yongji, Wang, Jinxin, Shan, Huiquan, Wang, Fei +17 more·2023·Science Advances

Abstract

The increased tameness to reduce avoidance of human in wild animals has been long proposed as the key step of animal domestication. The tameness is a complex behavior trait and largely determined by genetic factors. However, the underlying genetic mutations remain vague and how they influence the animal behaviors is yet to be explored. Behavior tests of a wild-domestic hybrid goat population indicate the locus under strongest artificial selection during domestication may exert a huge effect on the flight distance. Within this locus, only one missense mutation RRM1 I241V which was present in the early domestic goat ~6500 years ago. Genome editing of RRM1 I241V in mice showed increased tameness and sociability and reduced anxiety. These behavioral changes induced by RRM1 I241V were modulated by the alternation of activity of glutamatergic synapse and some other synapse-related pathways. This study established a link between RRM1 I241V and tameness, demonstrating that the complex behavioral change can be achieved by mutations under strong selection during animal domestication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.adf4068

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The genetics of domestication are relatively well understood for livestock.

    “However, domestication is a long and difficult process, but the genetics of domestication are relatively well understood for livestock143–148.”

    From Chromosomal-level reference genome assembly of muskox (Ovibos moschatus) from Banks Island in the Canadian Arctic, a resource for conservation genomics (2024) · cites this paper as [148]

    The Discussion reports a domestication-related genetic locus in goats, supporting some knowledge of livestock domestication genetics. But the Abstract says the mutations underlying tameness remain vague; the paper does not establish that domestication genetics are relatively well understood across livestock. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dou, M., Li, M., Zheng, Z., Chen, Q., Wu, Y., Wang, J., Shan, H., Wang, F., Dai, X., Li, Y., Yang, Z., Tan, G., Luo, F., Chen, L., Shi, Y. S., Wu, J. W., Luo, X.-J., Asadollahpour Nanaei, H., Niyazbekova, Z., Zhang, G., Wang, W., Zhao, S., Zheng, W., Wang, X., & Jiang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Northwest A&F University (CN)
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
  • Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
  • Xinjiang Agricultural University (CN)
  • Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
  • Model Animal Research Center (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shannxi, 712100, China.
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Dou, Mingle
  • Li, Ming
  • Zheng, Zhuqing
  • Zhao, Shanting
  • Zheng, Wenxin
  • Wang, Xihong
  • Jiang, Yu
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2023-06-23
Volume
9
Issue
25
Pages
eadf4068-eadf4068
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381804400
Cited by
10
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (2022YFF1000100, U21A20247)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province
  • Northwest A and F University
  • Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
RRM1, missense mutations, animal domestication, flight distance, sociability, anxiety, glutamatergic synapses, selective breeding, behavioral genetics
MeSH terms
Domestication, Animals, Animals, Domestic, Behavior, Animal, Goats, Ribonucleoside Diphosphate Reductase, Selection, Genetic, Mutation, Missense, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review