Cited by 360Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Widespread Changes in Synaptic Markers as a Function of Sleep and Wakefulness in Drosophila

Open access

Abstract

Sleep is universal, strictly regulated, and necessary for cognition. Why this is so remains a mystery, although recent work suggests that sleep, memory, and plasticity are linked. However, little is known about how wakefulness and sleep affect synapses. Using Western blots and confocal microscopy in Drosophila , we found that protein levels of key components of central synapses were high after waking and low after sleep. These changes were related to behavioral state rather than time of day and occurred in all major areas of the Drosophila brain. The decrease of synaptic markers during sleep was progressive, and sleep was necessary for their decline. Thus, sleep may be involved in maintaining synaptic homeostasis altered by waking activities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1166673

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 29 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–360 of 360

Metadata

Authors
Gilestro, G. F., Tononi, G., & Cirelli, C.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
  • Tononi, Giulio
  • Cirelli, Chiara
Venue
Science
Published
2009-04-03
Volume
324
Issue
5923
Pages
109-112
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2015113576
Cited by
360
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 26
FWCI
18.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (DP1OD000579)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
sleep, wakefulness, synaptic markers, synaptic homeostasis, Drosophila, behavioral state, memory consolidation, neuroplasticity
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Clocks, Brain, Circadian Rhythm, Drosophila melanogaster, Female, Homeostasis, Male, Sleep, Sleep Deprivation, Synapses, Wakefulness, Blotting, Western, Synapsins, Microscopy, Confocal, Models, Animal, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Drosophila Proteins, Qa-SNARE Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review