Cited by 343Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionPhysiological and biochemical adaptations

Scaling of Brain Metabolism with a Fixed Energy Budget per Neuron: Implications for Neuronal Activity, Plasticity and Evolution

Open access
Herculano-Houzel, Suzana·2011·PLoS ONE

Abstract

It is usually considered that larger brains have larger neurons, which consume more energy individually, and are therefore accompanied by a larger number of glial cells per neuron. These notions, however, have never been tested. Based on glucose and oxygen metabolic rates in awake animals and their recently determined numbers of neurons, here I show that, contrary to the expected, the estimated glucose use per neuron is remarkably constant, varying only by 40% across the six species of rodents and primates (including humans). The estimated average glucose use per neuron does not correlate with neuronal density in any structure. This suggests that the energy budget of the whole brain per neuron is fixed across species and brain sizes, such that total glucose use by the brain as a whole, by the cerebral cortex and also by the cerebellum alone are linear functions of the number of neurons in the structures across the species (although the average glucose consumption per neuron is at least 10× higher in the cerebral cortex than in the cerebellum). These results indicate that the apparently remarkable use in humans of 20% of the whole body energy budget by a brain that represents only 2% of body mass is explained simply by its large number of neurons. Because synaptic activity is considered the major determinant of metabolic cost, a conserved energy budget per neuron has several profound implications for synaptic homeostasis and the regulation of firing rates, synaptic plasticity, brain imaging, pathologies, and for brain scaling in evolution.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Across six rodents and primates, estimated glucose use per neuron is remarkably constant, varying only about 40%, and total brain glucose use is best described as a linear function of neuron number rather than brain mass. This fixed energy budget per neuron implies that human brain energy demand is explained by its large number of neurons, with consequences for activity, plasticity, imaging, pathology, and evolution.

Key findings

  • Estimated glucose use per neuron varied only 1.4-fold (40%) across mouse, rat, squirrel, macaque, baboon, and human, despite a 1213-fold variation in total brain neurons and a 3627-fold variation in brain mass.
  • Total glucose use by the whole brain, cerebral cortex, and cerebellum scaled linearly with the number of neurons in each structure: whole brain power exponent 0.988, p<0.0001; linear fit r²=1.0, p<0.0001; cerebral cortex power exponent 0.944, p=0.0002; cerebellum power exponent 0.880, p=0.0001.
  • Average glucose consumption per neuron was much higher in cerebral cortex (1.50×10⁻⁸ ± 0.49×10⁻⁸ µmol/neuron·min) than in cerebellum (0.87×10⁻⁹ ± 0.36×10⁻⁹ µmol/neuron·min), while whole-brain average was 5.79×10⁻⁹ ± 0.76×10⁻⁹ µmol/neuron·min.
  • The human brain’s use of about 20% of the body energy budget at 2% of body mass is attributed to its large number of neurons; a brain with 86 billion neurons is estimated to use 497.9 µmol glucose/min, or 516 kCal/day.

Methods

  • The study analyzed previously published in vivo glucose (CMRglc) and oxygen (CMRO2) metabolic rates from unanesthetized, resting adult animals, obtained from Karbowski (2007), for six species: mouse, rat, squirrel, macaque monkey, baboon, and human.
  • Neuron numbers for whole brain, cerebral cortex, and cerebellum came from prior isotropic fractionator studies using DAPI-stained nuclei and NeuN immunoreactivity.
  • Total glucose and oxygen use were calculated as the product of published specific rates and structure mass, then compared with neuron numbers using power fits, linear fits, and Spearman correlations.

Limitations

  • The paper does not include a formal limitations section; it states that the study is entirely based on analysis of previously published data on brain metabolism and numbers of neurons.
  • Evident from the text: the main glucose analysis includes only six species, and the oxygen analysis includes only four species (rat, monkey, baboon, human), limiting cross-species generalization.
  • Evident from the text: the cerebral cortex glucose table omits squirrel, and the conclusions rely on indirect estimates and assumptions about neuron–astrocyte metabolic coupling rather than direct per-neuron energy measurements.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0017514

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 67 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The estimated glucose use per neuron is remarkably constant, varying only by 40% across the six species of rodents and primates including humans.

    “Based on glucose and oxygen metabolic rates in awake animals and their recently determined numbers of neurons, here I show that, contrary to the expected, the estimated glucose use per neuron is remarkably constant, varying only by 40% across the six species of rodents and primates (including humans).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] J Karbowski, 2007, Global and regional brain metabolic scaling and its functional consequences., BMC Biol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingnone given

    Average glucose consumption per neuron is at least 10 times higher in the cerebral cortex than in the cerebellum.

    “although the average glucose consumption per neuron is at least 10× higher in the cerebral cortex than in the cerebellum”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The estimated average glucose use per neuron does not correlate with neuronal density in any structure.

    “The estimated average glucose use per neuron does not correlate with neuronal density in any structure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Small variations in estimated average glucose use per neuron are not correlated with the ratio between non-neuronal and neuronal cells (glia/neuron ratio) (Spearman p values).

    “nor with the ratio between non-neuronal and neuronal cells (which approximates the glia/neuron ratio in the tissue; Spearman correlation, cerebral cortex, p = 0.2301; cerebellum, p = 0.5485; whole brain, p = 0.8480).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Small variations in estimated average glucose use per neuron are not correlated with variations in neuronal density across species in any structure (Spearman p values).

    “The small variations in the estimated average glucose use per neuron are not correlated with variations in neuronal density across species in any structure (Spearman correlation: cerebral cortex, p = 0.3173; cerebellum, p = 0.6892; whole brain, p = 0.5653)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 27
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Total glucose use by the whole brain, by the cerebral cortex, and by the cerebellum alone are linear functions of the number of neurons in those structures across the six species.

    “total glucose use by the brain as a whole, by the cerebral cortex and also by the cerebellum alone are linear functions of the number of neurons in the structures across the species”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Variation in total glucose use by the whole brain or cerebral cortex matches closely variation in numbers of neurons across species, although not as closely in the cerebellum.

    “Indeed, the variation in total glucose use by the whole brain or cerebral cortex matches closely the variation in numbers of neurons in these structures across species (Table 1), although not as closely in the cerebellum.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Small variations in average energy use per neuron do not correlate with structure mass nor with number of neurons in the structure (Spearman p values).

    “Moreover, the small variations in average energy use per neuron do not correlate with structure mass nor with number of neurons in the structure (Spearman correlation, glucose: cerebral cortex, p = 0.2301; cerebellum, p = 0.1615; whole brain, p = 0.8480. Spearman correlation, oxygen: whole brain, p = 0.2987).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Across the mammals examined so far, the apparent exponent for neuronal density scaling with brain mass for the whole sample is −0.172, close to the exponent of −0.15 for brain metabolism, but there is no universal scaling of neuronal density in the brain with brain mass across all species.

    “Across the mammals that we have examined so far, the apparent exponent for the whole sample is −0.172, close to the exponent of −0.15 for brain metabolism, but notice that there is no universal scaling of neuronal density in the brain with brain mass across all species (Figure 2c).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The average metabolic cost per neuron is relatively stable across species, with small variations that are not correlated with neuronal density nor with brain size.

    “The results of this analysis, shown here, suggest that, contrary to expectations, the average metabolic cost per neuron is relatively stable across species, with small variations that are not correlated with neuronal density (and therefore not correlated with neuronal size) nor with brain size.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The average brain neuron is estimated to cost 5.79×10−9 μmol glucose/min, with no significant difference between rodents and primates.

    “As the average brain neuron is estimated to cost 5.79×10−9 µmol glucose/min, with no significant difference between rodents and primates”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Average energy use per neuron is fixed (relatively invariant) across species and orders, such that total brain metabolism is a simple, linear function of the number of neurons that compose the brain.

    “the direct scaling of total brain metabolic cost as a function of the number of brain neurons shown here indicates that the average energy use per neuron is fixed (that is, relatively invariant) across species and orders, such that total brain metabolism is a simple, linear function of the number of neurons that compose that brain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The precise exponent that describes the scaling of average neuronal density with brain mass varies across mammalian orders and, for cross-order comparisons of metabolic scaling, is strongly dependent on the choice of species analyzed.

    “as shown here, the precise exponent that describes the scaling of average neuronal density with brain mass varies across mammalian orders, and, for cross-order comparisons of metabolic scaling such as in [20], is strongly dependent on the choice of species analyzed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] J Karbowski, 2007, Global and regional brain metabolic scaling and its functional consequences., BMC Biol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Neuronal density decreases with increasing brain size in rodents, but does not vary consistently with brain size in primates.

    “As a result, neuronal density decreases with increasing brain size in rodents, but it does not vary consistently with brain size in primates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Karbowski estimated that cerebral energy per neuron increases with brain size based on the supposed scaling of neuronal density with brain size.

    “although Karbowski [20], based on the supposed scaling of neuronal density with brain size, estimated that cerebral energy per neuron increases with brain size.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] J Karbowski, 2007, Global and regional brain metabolic scaling and its functional consequences., BMC Biol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Nearly 80% of a neuron's energy budget goes toward glutamate-related neurotransmission, and 13% is used to maintain the resting potential of the cell membrane.

    “an estimate of the distribution of the energy budget among the several energy-consuming processes within a neuron which predicted that, while nearly 80% of a neuron's energy budget go toward glutamate-related neurotransmission, 13% are used to maintain the resting potential of the cell membrane [23].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] D Attwell, 2001, An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain., J Cereb Blood FLow Metab source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The majority of glucose used by the brain is taken up by astrocytes and used in anaerobic glycolysis that generates lactate, while the remainder is used by neurons in oxidative glycolysis.

    “the majority of the glucose used by the brain is taken up by astrocytes and used in anaerobic glycolysis that generates lactate, while the remainder is used by neurons in oxidative glycolysis [31].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31] F Hyder, 2006, Neuronal-glial glucose oxidation and glutamatergic-GABAergic function., J Cereb Blood Flow Metab source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A mammalian brain with 100 million neurons is predicted to consume 0.579 μmol glucose/min, requiring 0.6 kCal/day; with 1 billion neurons, 5.79 μmol/min or 6 kCal/day; and with 100 billion neurons, 579 μmol/min or 600 kCal/day, regardless of brain volume.

    “Thus, a mammalian brain with 100 million neurons would be predicted to consume 0.579 µmol glucose/min, requiring 0.6 kCal/day; a brain with 1 billion neurons would use 5.79 µmol glucose/min, or 6 kCal/day; and a brain with 100 billion neurons would use 579 µmol glucose/min, or 600 kCal/day, regardless of the volume of these brains (Table 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The six species examined are representative of mammals generally for the scaling of brain metabolism with neuron number.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Total glucose use by neurons and astrocytes together is coupled directly to glutamate-mediated synaptic transmission, which accounts for 80-90% of total glucose use in the cerebral cortex.

    “As a consequence, the total glucose use by neurons and astrocytes together is coupled directly to glutamate-mediated synaptic transmission [32], [34], [36], which accounts for 80–90% of total glucose use in the cerebral cortex [32].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [32] NR Sibson, 1998, Stoichiometric coupling of brain glucose metabolism and glutamatergic neuronal activity., PNAS source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [34] PJ Magistretti, 1999, Energy on demand., Science source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [36] A Loaiza, 2003, Glutamate triggers rapid glucose transport stimulation in astrocytes as evidenced by real-time confocal microscopy., J Neurosci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Glucose taken up by astrocytes is related to neuronal energetics through stoichiometric coupling to uptake of glutamate released by synaptic activity and its conversion to glutamine, while lactate produced by anaerobic glycolysis is shuttled to neurons and used as fuel.

    “the glucose taken up by astrocytes is related to neuronal energetics through the stoichiometric coupling to the uptake of glutamate released by synaptic activity and its subsequent conversion to glutamine, while the lactate produced by anaerobic glycolysis is shuttled to neurons and used by them as fuel [32]–[35].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [32]–[35]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Increasing size of a neuronal cell, including all arborizations, should impose a higher metabolic demand related to the cost of maintaining membrane polarization, and energy metabolism is coupled to synaptic activity.

    “Given that the increasing size of a neuronal cell (including all of its arborizations) should impose a higher metabolic demand related to the cost of maintaining membrane polarization [23] and that energy metabolism is coupled to synaptic activity [34]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [23] D Attwell, 2001, An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain., J Cereb Blood FLow Metab source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [34] PJ Magistretti, 1999, Energy on demand., Science source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Mammals whose brain scales with economical neuronal scaling rules, such as primates, have a large number of brain neurons for a given body size and would be expected to have a larger relative brain metabolic rate than other mammals, such as rodents, which have a smaller number of brain neurons for a same body or brain size.

    “In this way, mammals whose brain scales with economical neuronal scaling rules, such as primates, have a large number of brain neurons for a given body size, and would accordingly be expected to have a larger relative brain metabolic rate than other mammals, such as rodents, which have a smaller number of brain neurons for a same body or brain size [24], [25].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [24] S Herculano-Houzel, 2006, : Cellular scaling rules for rodent brains., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [25] S Herculano-Houzel, 2007, Cellular scaling rules for primate brains., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The existence of a fixed energy budget per neuron suggests that neuronal metabolism imposes constraints upon brain structure, function, and evolution, with direct consequences for pathologies in which neuronal metabolism is disturbed.

    “the existence of a fixed energy budget per neuron suggests that neuronal metabolism imposes a series of constraints upon brain structure, function, and evolution, with direct consequences for pathologies in which neuronal metabolism is disturbed”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Brain metabolism is not necessarily related to whole body metabolism in any determining way; any apparent relationship might be coincidental and dependent on the rate with which brain size scales as a function of its number of neurons.

    “the scaling of brain metabolism as a function of total numbers of neurons opens the possibility that brain metabolism is not necessarily related to whole body metabolism in any determining way; any apparent relationship might be coincidental, and dependent on the rate with which brain size scales as a function of its number of neurons, which we have shown to vary across mammalian orders [24], [25]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [24] S Herculano-Houzel, 2006, : Cellular scaling rules for rodent brains., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [25] S Herculano-Houzel, 2007, Cellular scaling rules for primate brains., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [41] DK Sarko, 2009, Cellular scaling rules of insectivore brains., Front Neuroanat source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Mechanisms of synaptic homeostasis and plasticity to maintain the number of synapses in check, as well as sparse coding, may be direct consequences of a limiting and size-invariant, fixed energy budget per neuron.

    “Thus, mechanisms of synaptic homeostasis [62] and plasticity to maintain the number of synapses in check (including the decrease of synaptic markers during sleep [63]), as well as sparse coding, with only a small proportion of neurons firing at high frequencies at any moment [49], [64], [65], may be direct consequences to brain function of a limiting and size-invariant, fixed energy budget per”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [62] GG Turrigiano, 2008, The self-tuning neuron: synaptic scaling of excitatory synapses., Cell source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [63] GF Gilestro, 2009, Widespread changes in synaptic markers as a function of sleep and wakefulness in Drosophila., Science source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [49] P Lennie, 2003, The cost of cortical computation., Curr Biol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Larger neurons with larger numbers of synapses in culture have sparser connectivity and reduced unitary synapse strength, such that firing rate is preserved across clusters of different sizes.

    “Indeed, larger neurons with larger numbers of synapses in culture have recently been found to have sparser connectivity and reduced unitary synapse strength, such that firing rate was preserved across clusters of different sizes [61].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [61] NR Wilson, 2007, Synaptic reorganization in scaled networks of controlled size., J Neurosci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Mechanisms must be in place that adjust firing rate with increasing neuronal size and avoid excessive synaptic activity.

    “An energy budget that is relatively invariant across neuronal sizes implies that mechanisms must be in place that adjust firing rate with increasing neuronal size and avoid excessive synaptic activity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The orangutan brain can be estimated to have roughly 1/3 as many neurons as the human brain and to require 1/3 as many calories to support the brain alone, about 180 kCal.

    “The orangutan brain is about a third the size of the human brain, and therefore, given the linear neuronal scaling rules that apply to primate brains, can be estimated to have roughly 1/3 as many neurons and to require 1/3 as many calories to support the brain alone, that is, about 180 kCal.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The orangutan brain is about one third the size of the human brain.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The larger the number of neurons, the higher the total caloric cost of the brain, and therefore the more time required to be spent feeding in order to support the brain alone.

    “As illustrated in Table 4, the larger the number of neurons, the higher the total caloric cost of the brain, and therefore the more time required to be spent feeding in order to support the brain alone.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Neuronal activation is associated with a small energy demand: an 8-12% increase in ATP production with visual stimulation in awake human visual cortex and a 5% increase in metabolic rate with somatosensory stimulation in awake somatosensory cortex.

    “While fractional changes in neuronal firing frequency are directly proportional to changes in energy use [53], the energy demand associated with neuronal activation appears to be small: there is only a 8–12% increase in ATP production with visual stimulation in the awake human visual cortex [54], and a 5% increase in metabolic rate with somatosensory stimulation in the awake somatosensory cortex [”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [54] A-L Lin, 2010, Nonlinear coupling between cerebral blood flow, oxygen consumption, and ATP production in human visual cortex., PNAS source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [55] PT Fox, 1986, Focal physiological uncoupling of cerebral blood flow and oxidative metabolism during somatosensory stimulation in human subjects., PNAS source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The energy budget per neuron, contrary to the energy budget for other cell types, has been stretched in evolution to remain constant, and therefore might operate close to its limit, imposing a constraint for neuronal activity.

    “The relatively constant values of energy use per neuron across species of smaller neuronal densities (and hence larger neurons) thus suggests that the energy budget per neuron, contrary to the energy budget for other cell types, has been stretched in evolution to remain constant, and therefore might operate close to its limit, imposing a constraint for neuronal activity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The energy budget of individual neurons is limited over time, as it does not accommodate large variations related to neuronal activity.

    “Additionally, there is evidence that the energy budget of individual neurons is not only limited across species but also over time, given that it does not accommodate large variations related to neuronal activity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Chronic impairments of neuronal metabolism would be expected to compromise brain function and contribute to brain pathology.

    “For the same reason, chronic impairments of neuronal metabolism would be expected to compromise brain function and contribute to brain pathology, which may be the case in epilepsy (due to runaway excitatory activity or directly to metabolic disorders [57]), sepsis [58], mitochondrial disorders, which strongly affect the brain [59], and Alzheimer's disease [60].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [57] C la Fougère, 2009, PET and SPECT in epilepsy: a critical review., Epilepsy Behav source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [58] JC d'Avila, 2008, Sepsis induces brain mitochondrial dysfunction., Crit Care Med source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [59] J Finsterer, 2008, Cognitive decline as a manifestation of mitochondrial disorders (mitochondrial dementia)., J Neurol Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

28 of 28
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The six species examined are representative of mammals generally for the scaling of brain metabolism with neuron number.

    “Thus, a mammalian brain with 100 million neurons would be predicted to consume 0.579 µmol glucose/min, requiring 0.6 kCal/day; a brain with 1 billion neurons would use 5.79 µmol glucose/min, or 6 kCal/day; and a brain with 100 billion neurons would use 579 µmol glucose/min, or 600 kCal/day, regardless of the volume of these brains (Table 4).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The orangutan brain is about one third the size of the human brain.

    “The orangutan brain is about a third the size of the human brain”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The foods ingested by orangutans are 100% calorically efficient.

    “assuming 100% caloric efficiency of the foods ingested”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The human brain uses 20% of the whole body energy budget while representing only 2% of body mass.

    “the apparently remarkable use in humans of 20% of the whole body energy budget by a brain that represents only 2% of this mass”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The adult human brain makes up only 2% of body weight but consumes approximately 20% of the energy deriving from glucose, which provides the bioenergetic basis for neurotransmission.

    “The adult human brain makes up only 2% of the body weight, but it consumes approximately 20% of the energy deriving from glucose, which provides the bioenergetic basis for neurotransmission.”
  • The proportional energy need of the adult human brain is more than twice that of adult non-primate vertebrates, which allocate only 2% to 8% of their basal metabolism to their brain; this may be related to the higher development and larger neuronal number of the human brain.

    “The proportional energy need of the adult human brain is more than twice that of adult non-primate vertebrates, which allocate only 2% to 8% of their basal metabolism to their brain; this may be related to the higher development and larger neuronal number of the human brain [28].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

  • Cerebellar O/N variation is understated

    Minor

    The cerebellar O/N values range from 0.067 to 0.232, a 3.46-fold variation, not the reported 1.4-fold variation.

    Reported 1.4 · recomputed 3.462687

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. LR Campos, 2008, Cellular scaling rules for eight species of the order Rodentia., Soc Neurosci Abstr, 38

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herculano-Houzel, S.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2011-03-01
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
e17514
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997267143
Cited by
343
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 14
FWCI
8.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Institute for Translational Neuroscience
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
Keywords
brain scaling, neuronal density, cerebral cortex, cerebellum, synaptic homeostasis, synaptic plasticity, neuronal firing rate, brain evolution, rodents, primates, glial cells
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cell Count, Cerebellum, Cerebral Cortex, Energy Metabolism, Biological Evolution, Glucose, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Oxygen Consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review