Cited by 263

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Magnetic Field Sensing Beyond the Standard Quantum Limit Using 10-Spin NOON States

Jones, Jonathan A., Karlen, Steven D., Fitzsimons, Joseph, Ardavan, Arzhang, Benjamin, Simon C., Briggs, G. Andrew D., Morton, John J. L.·2009·Science

Abstract

Quantum-Enhanced Measurement: The single electron spin in a molecule, atom, or quantum dot precesses in a magnetic field and so can be used as a magnetic field sensor. As the number of spins in a sensor increases, so too does the sensitivity. Quantum mechanical entanglement of the spin ensemble should then allow the sensitivity to increase much more than would be expected from a simple increase in the number of individual spins in the ensemble. Using the highly symmetric molecule, trimethyl phosphite, a molecule containing a central P atom surrounded by nine hydrogen atoms, Jones et al. (p. 1166 , published online 23 April) quantum mechanically entangled the 10 spins (or qubits) to generate a nearly 10-fold enhancement in the magnetic field sensitivity. The results pave the way for the further development of quantum sensors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1170730

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1017/S0305004100013554 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Deutsch D., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. A 400, 97 (1985).
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.1515 · DOI
  4. 10.1126/science.1104149 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.1138007 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5870 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/nature05101 · DOI
  8. 10.1126/science.1097576 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.50.67 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/35005011 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1126/science.275.5298.350 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/S0079-6565(00)00033-9 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.2417 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2733 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/0950034021000011536 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.063828 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.020502 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.090501 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.210402 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/20.278852 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/nature04272 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.140501 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jones, J. A., Karlen, S. D., Fitzsimons, J., Ardavan, A., Benjamin, S. C., Briggs, G. A. D., & Morton, J. J. L.
Venue
Science
Published
2009-05-29
Volume
324
Issue
5931
Pages
1166-1168
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
263
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review