Cited by 452

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A quantum Rosetta stone for interferometry

Lee, Hwang, Kok, Pieter, Dowling, Jonathan P.·2002·Journal of Modern Optics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0950034021000011536

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In photonic approaches, the optimal measurement strategy typically relies on NOON states, in which all N photons propagate in one arm or the other of an interferometer.

    “In photonic approaches, the optimal measurement strategy typically relies on the preparation of ‘NOON’ states10, in which all N photons propagate in one arm or the other of an interferometer.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Scully M. O., 1997, Quantum Optics, 10.1017/CBO9780511813993 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Helstrom C. W., 1976, Mathematics in Science and Engineering, 123
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevD.23.1693 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.1515 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.4033 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.2944 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2352 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1355 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/BF01135861 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevA.56.R1083 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.R4649 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1117/1.602092 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2733 · DOI
  14. Kok P., 2001, Phys. Rev. A, 63, 063 407, 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.063407 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1389 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.013602 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.043802 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.052104 · DOI
  19. 10.1088/0954-8998/4/2/004 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevA.47.1667 · DOI
  21. Feynman R. P., 1979, The Feynman Lectures on Physics III
  22. 10.1007/BF01909939 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevA.48.3186 · DOI
  24. Champollion J. F., 1824, Précis du Système hiéroglyphique des Anciens Egyptiens
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2124 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevA.52.3554 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4710 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4714 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1238/Physica.Topical.076a00218 · DOI
  30. 10.1098/rspa.1998.0164 · DOI
  31. Kimble H. J., ROSE
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevA.48.1548 · DOI
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.4505 · DOI
  34. 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.4004 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5098 · DOI
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1852 · DOI
  37. 10.1103/PhysRevA.46.R6797 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1103/PhysRevA.47.5138 · DOI
  39. 10.1103/PhysRevA.49.4968 · DOI
  40. 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.1371 · DOI
  41. 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.030301 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.062311 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.257902 · DOI
  44. Lee H., 2002, Phys. Rev. A, 65, 030 101(R), 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.030101 · DOI
  45. 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.063814 · DOI
  46. 10.1103/PhysRevA.55.4330 · DOI
  47. Kok P., 2002, ROSE
  48. Kok P., 2002, ROSE

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lee, H., Kok, P., & Dowling, J. P.
Venue
Journal of Modern Optics
Published
2002-11
Volume
49
Issue
14-15
Pages
2325-2338
ISSN
  • 0950-0340
  • 1362-3044
Cited by
452
References
9
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review