Cited by 36,135Complex Network Analysis TechniquesComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisTheoretical and Computational Physics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks

Open access
Barabási, Albert-László, Albert, Réka·1999·Science

Abstract

Systems as diverse as genetic networks or the World Wide Web are best described as networks with complex topology. A common property of many large networks is that the vertex connectivities follow a scale-free power-law distribution. This feature was found to be a consequence of two generic mechanisms: (i) networks expand continuously by the addition of new vertices, and (ii) new vertices attach preferentially to sites that are already well connected. A model based on these two ingredients reproduces the observed stationary scale-free distributions, which indicates that the development of large networks is governed by robust self-organizing phenomena that go beyond the particulars of the individual systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.286.5439.509

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Rényi A., Publ. Math. Inst. Hung. Acad. Sci. 5, 17 (1960);
  2. Milgram S., Psychol. Today 2, 60 (1967);
  3. Barthélémy M., Amaral L. A. N., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 15 (1999).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,152

Metadata

Authors
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Venue
Science
Published
1999-10-15
Volume
286
Issue
5439
Pages
509-512
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2008620264
Cited by
36,135
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1122 · 2025: 1428 · 2024: 1382 · 2023: 1410 · 2022: 1628 · 2021: 1838 · 2020: 1757 · 2019: 1878 · 2018: 1959 · 2017: 1885 · 2016: 1886 · 2015: 1997 · 2014: 2037 · 2013: 1914 · 2012: 1848
FWCI
104.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
Keywords
scale-free networks, power-law degree distribution, random networks, preferential attachment, network expansion, self-organization, complex network topology, vertex connectivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review