Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,278

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving the forecast for biodiversity under climate change

Open access
Urban, M. C., Bocedi, G., Hendry, A. P., Mihoub, J.-B., Pe’er, G., Singer, A., Bridle, J. R., Crozier, L. G., De Meester, L., Godsoe, W., Gonzalez, A., Hellmann, J. J., Holt, R. D., Huth, A., Johst, K., Krug, C. B., Leadley, P. W., Palmer, S. C. F., Pantel, J. H., Schmitz, A., Zollner, P. A., Travis, J. M. J.·2016·Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As global climate change accelerates, one of the most urgent tasks for the coming decades is to develop accurate predictions about biological responses to guide the effective protection of biodiversity. Predictive models in biology provide a means for scientists to project changes to species and ecosystems in response to disturbances such as climate change. Most current predictive models, however, exclude important biological mechanisms such as demography, dispersal, evolution, and species interactions. These biological mechanisms have been shown to be important in mediating past and present responses to climate change. Thus, current modeling efforts do not provide sufficiently accurate predictions. Despite the many complexities involved, biologists are rapidly developing tools that include the key biological processes needed to improve predictive accuracy. The biggest obstacle to applying these more realistic models is that the data needed to inform them are almost always missing. We suggest ways to fill this growing gap between model sophistication and information to predict and prevent the most damaging aspects of climate change for life on Earth. ADVANCES: On the basis of empirical and theoretical evidence, we identify six biological mechanisms that commonly shape responses to climate change yet are too often missing from current predictive models: physiology; demography, life history, and phenology; species interactions; evolutionary potential and population differentiation; dispersal, colonization, and range dynamics; and responses to environmental variation. We prioritize the types of information needed to inform each of these mechanisms and suggest proxies for data that are missing or difficult to collect. We show that even for well-studied species, we often lack critical information that would be necessary to apply more realistic, mechanistic models. Consequently, data limitations likely override the potential gains in accuracy of more realistic models. Given the enormous challenge of collecting this detailed information on millions of species around the world, we highlight practical methods that promote the greatest gains in predictive accuracy. Trait-based approaches leverage sparse data to make more general inferences about unstudied species. Targeting species with high climate sensitivity and disproportionate ecological impact can yield important insights about future ecosystem change. Adaptive modeling schemes provide a means to target the most important data while simultaneously improving predictive accuracy. OUTLOOK: Strategic collections of essential biological information will allow us to build generalizable insights that inform our broader ability to anticipate species’ responses to climate change and other human-caused disturbances. By increasing accuracy and making uncertainties explicit, scientists can deliver improved projections for biodiversity under climate change together with characterizations of uncertainty to support more informed decisions by policymakers and land managers. Toward this end, a globally coordinated effort to fill data gaps in advance of the growing climate-fueled biodiversity crisis offers substantial advantages in efficiency, coverage, and accuracy. Biologists can take advantage of the lessons learned from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s development, coordination, and integration of climate change projections. Climate and weather projections were greatly improved by incorporating important mechanisms and testing predictions against global weather station data. Biology can do the same. We need to adopt this meteorological approach to predicting biological responses to climate change to enhance our ability to mitigate future changes to global biodiversity and the services it provides to humans. Emerging models are beginning to incorporate six key biological mechanisms that can improve predictions of biological responses to climate change.: Models that include biological mechanisms have been used to project (clockwise from top) the evolution of disease-harboring mosquitoes, future environments and land use, physiological responses of invasive species such as cane toads, demographic responses of penguins to future climates, climate-dependent dispersal behavior in butterflies, and mismatched interactions between butterflies and their host plants. Despite these modeling advances, we seldom have the detailed data needed to build these models, necessitating new efforts to collect the relevant data to parameterize more biologically realistic predictive models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aad8466

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. J. Settele et al . in Climate Change 2014: Impacts Adaptation and Vulnerability. Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change C. B. Field et al. Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press 2014) pp. 1–153.
  2. 10.1111/1365-2664.12482 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1111/ele.12443 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01620.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/35842 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02635.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1126/science.1222732 · DOI · Paper page
  8. E. Post Ecology of Climate Change: The Importance of Biotic Interactions (Princeton Univ. Press 2013). · doi:10.23943/princeton/9780691148472.001.0001
  9. 10.1098/rspb.2011.2367 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/nclimate1588 · DOI · Paper page
  11. BocediG.AtkinsK. E.LiaoJ.HenryR. C.TravisJ. M.HellmannJ. J., Effects of local adaptation and interspecific competition on species’ responses to climate change. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1297, 83–97 (2013). 2390587623905876 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/gcb.13251 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1073/pnas.0606292104 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.tree.2010.03.002 · DOI · Paper page
  15. PurvesD.ScharlemannJ.HarfootM.NewboldT.TittensorD. P.HuttonJ.EmmottS., Ecosystems: Time to model all life on Earth. Nature 493, 295–297 (2013). 2332519223325192 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1111/2041-210X.12162 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01277.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.tree.2011.02.012 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00663.x · DOI
  20. 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00143.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/nclimate2113 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.11.007 · DOI
  23. BuckleyL. B.UrbanM. C.AngillettaM. J.CrozierL. G.RisslerL. J.SearsM. W., Can mechanism inform species’ distribution models? Ecol. Lett. 13, 1041–1054 (2010).2048257420482574 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1126/science.1229931 · DOI · Paper page
  25. UrbanM. C.ZarnetskeP. L.SkellyD. K., Moving forward: Dispersal and species interactions determine biotic responses to climate change. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1297, 44–60 (2013).2381986423819864 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/nature09670 · DOI · Paper page
  27. M. J. Angilletta Thermal Adaptation: A Theoretical and Empirical Synthesis (Oxford Univ. Press Oxford 2009). · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1086/504848 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.05457.x · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01538.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0049 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1073/pnas.0806638106 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.2307/177366 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1098/rspb.1998.0514 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1126/science.1245993 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02177.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02177.x
  37. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01632.x · DOI
  38. 10.1017/S0016672399004140 · DOI
  39. 10.1126/science.1127000 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1073/pnas.0608379104 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05388.x · DOI
  42. C. Parmesan A. Williams-Anderson M. Moskwik A. S. Mikheyev M. C. Singer Endangered Quino checkerspot butterfly and climate change: Short-term success but long-term vulnerability? J. Insect Conserv. 19 185–204 (2015). 10.1007/s10841-014-9743-410.1007/s10841-014-9743-4 · DOI
  43. 10.1073/pnas.1408589111 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1098/rspb.2012.1890 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1890/07-1748.1 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1126/science.1210199 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1073/pnas.1116791109 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1098/rspb.2008.1681 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00123.x · DOI
  50. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120317 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01724.x · DOI
  52. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02784.x · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01681.x · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.05.019 · DOI
  55. 10.1126/science.1157174 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1126/science.1261824 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1111/gcb.13271 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/nclimate1514 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1890/ES11-00211.1 · DOI
  61. 10.1023/A:1005698407365 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1111/2041-210X.12470 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,278

Metadata

Authors
Urban, M. C., Bocedi, G., Hendry, A. P., Mihoub, J.-B., Pe’er, G., Singer, A., Bridle, J. R., Crozier, L. G., De Meester, L., Godsoe, W., Gonzalez, A., Hellmann, J. J., Holt, R. D., Huth, A., Johst, K., Krug, C. B., Leadley, P. W., Palmer, S. C. F., Pantel, J. H., Schmitz, A., Zollner, P. A., & Travis, J. M. J.
Venue
Science
Published
2016-09-09
Volume
353
Issue
6304
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2515706791
Cited by
1,278
References
3
FWCI
64.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Funders
  • Canada Research Chair
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Quebec Centre for Biodiversity Science
  • University of Florida Foundation
  • European Union Biodiversity Observation Network (EU-BON-FP7-308454)
  • KU Leuven Research Fund (PF/2010/07)
  • NSF (DEB-1119877, PLR-1417754)
  • McDonnell Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving the forecast for biodiversity under climate change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.aad8466
The paper
Urban, M. C., Bocedi, G., Hendry, A. P., Mihoub, J.-B., Pe’er, G., Singer, A., Bridle, J. R., Crozier, L. G., De Meester, L., Godsoe, W., Gonzalez, A., Hellmann, J. J., Holt, R. D., Huth, A., Johst, K., Krug, C. B., Leadley, P. W., Palmer, S. C. F., Pantel, J. H., . . . Travis, J. M. J. (2016). Improving the forecast for biodiversity under climate change. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad8466

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.