The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Finding the first Americans
Abstract
The first humans to reach the Americas are likely to have come via a coastal route
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People first settled the Americas before Clovis.
“It is largely, but not entirely, accepted by the archaeological community that people first settled the Americas before Clovis (1–3)”
From Pre-Clovis occupation of the Americas identified by human fecal biomarkers in coprolites from Paisley Caves, Oregon (2020) · cites this paper as [2]
Citations
Cites
New Archaeological Evidence for an Early Human Presence at Monte Verde, Chile
Dillehay, T. D., Ocampo, C., Saavedra, J., Sawakuchi, A. O., Vega, R. M., Pino, M., Collins, M. B., Scott Cummings, L., Arregui, I., Villagran, X. S., et al. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141923 · Cited by 307
Self-citationHalligan, J. J., Waters, M. R., Perrotti, A., Owens, I. J., Feinberg, J. M., Bourne, M. D., Fenerty, B., Winsborough, B., Carlson, D., Fisher, D. C., et al. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1600375 · Cited by 259
The Buttermilk Creek Complex and the origins of Clovis at the Debra L. Friedkin Site, Texas
Waters, M. R., Forman, S. L., Jennings, T. A., Nordt, L. C., Driese, S. G., Feinberg, J. M., Keene, J. L., Halligan, J., Lindquist, A., Pierson, J., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1201855 · Cited by 229
Bourgeon, L., Burke, A., & Higham, T. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169486 · Cited by 184
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 10.1038/nature19085 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1218443 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1207663 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.357.6351.542 · DOI
- 10.1080/15564890701628612 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/sciadv.1602778 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.1501385 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature22065 · DOI
- 10.1080/20555563.2017.1348091 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quaint.2011.02.030 · DOI
- 10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<99:DFAAOT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shillito, L.-M., Whelton, H. L., Blong, J. C., Jenkins, D. L., Connolly, T. J., & Bull, I. D. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba6404 · Cited by 91
Landscape rules predict optimal superhighways for the first peopling of sahul
Crabtree, S. A., White, D. A., Bradshaw, C. J. A., Saltré, F., Williams, A. N., Beaman, R. J., Bird, M. I., & Ulm, S. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01106-8 · Cited by 74
Potter, B. A., Chatters, J. C., Prentiss, A. M., Fiedel, S. J., Haynes, G., Kelly, R. L., Kilby, J. D., Lanoë, F., Holland-Lulewicz, J., Miller, D. S., et al. (2022) · PaleoAmerica · doi:10.1080/20555563.2021.1978721 · Cited by 53
Schmid, M. M. E., Dugmore, A. J., Foresta, L., Newton, A. J., Vésteinsson, O., & Wood, R. (2018) · Quaternary Geochronology · doi:10.1016/j.quageo.2018.07.015 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Braje, T. J., Dillehay, T. D., Erlandson, J. M., Klein, R. G., & Rick, T. C.
- Affiliations
- Department of Anthropology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.
- Department of Anthropology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
- Department of Anthropology and Museum of Natural and Cultural History, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
- Departments of Anthropology and Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
- Department of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2017-11-03
- Volume
- 358
- Issue
- 6363
- Pages
- 592-594
- ISSN
- 0036-8075
- 1095-9203
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
