Cited by 2,424Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Slide-seq: A scalable technology for measuring genome-wide expression at high spatial resolution

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Gene expression at fine scale: Mapping gene expression at the single-cell level within tissues remains a technical challenge. Rodriques et al. developed a method called Slide-seq, whereby RNA was spatially resolved from tissue sections by transfer onto a surface covered with DNA-barcoded beads. Applying Slide-seq to regions of a mouse brain revealed spatial gene expression patterns in the Purkinje layer of the cerebellum and axes of variation across Purkinje cell compartments. The authors used this method to dissect the temporal evolution of cell type–specific responses in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury. Science , this issue p. 1463

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aaw1219

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 49 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,006

Metadata

Authors
Rodriques, S. G., Stickels, R. R., Goeva, A., Martin, C. A., Murray, E., Vanderburg, C. R., Welch, J., Chen, L. M., Chen, F., & Macosko, E. Z.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Fei
  • Macosko, Evan Z.
Venue
Science
Published
2019-03-29
Volume
363
Issue
6434
Pages
1463-1467
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2915848182
Cited by
2,424
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 385 · 2025: 391 · 2024: 415 · 2023: 319 · 2022: 300 · 2021: 318 · 2020: 212 · 2019: 80
FWCI
75.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIH Office of the Director (DP2 AG058488-01, 1DP5OD024583)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Slide-seq, spatial transcriptomics, cerebellum, hippocampus, traumatic brain injury, single-cell RNA sequencing, mouse model
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Animals, Cerebellum, Disease Models, Animal, Frozen Sections, Gene Expression Regulation, Hippocampus, Purkinje Cells, RNA, Messenger, Transcription, Genetic, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Cell Size, Mice, Genome-Wide Association Study, Single-Cell Analysis, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review