Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 657

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Feasibility of blood testing combined with PET-CT to screen for cancer and guide intervention

Open access
Lennon, Anne Marie, Buchanan, Adam H., Kinde, Isaac, Warren, Andrew, Honushefsky, Ashley, Cohain, Ariella T., Ledbetter, David H., Sanfilippo, Fred, Sheridan, Kathleen, Rosica, Dillenia, Adonizio, Christian S., Hwang, Hee Jung, Lahouel, Kamel, Cohen, Joshua D., Douville, Christopher, Patel, Aalpen A., Hagmann, Leonardo N., Rolston, David D., Malani, Nirav, Zhou, Shibin, Bettegowda, Chetan, Diehl, David L., Urban, Bobbi, Still, Christopher D., Kann, Lisa, Woods, Julie I., Salvati, Zachary M., Vadakara, Joseph, Leeming, Rosemary, Bhattacharya, Prianka, Walter, Carroll, Parker, Alex, Lengauer, Christoph, Klein, Alison, Tomasetti, Cristian, Fishman, Elliot K., Hruban, Ralph H., Kinzler, Kenneth W., Vogelstein, Bert, Papadopoulos, Nickolas·2020·Science

Abstract

A real-time trial of a cancer blood test: Cancers diagnosed early are often more responsive to treatment. Blood tests that detect molecular markers of cancer have successfully identified individuals already known to have the disease. Lennon et al. conducted an exploratory study that more closely reflects the way in which such blood tests would be used in the future. They evaluated the feasibility and safety of incorporating a multicancer blood test into the routine clinical care of 10,000 women with no history of cancer. Over a 12-month period, the blood test detected 26 cancers of different types. A combination of the blood test and positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) imaging led to surgical removal of nine of these cancers. Use of the blood test did not result in a large number of futile follow-up procedures. Science , this issue p. eabb9601

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abb9601

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 657

Metadata

Authors
Lennon, A. M., Buchanan, A. H., Kinde, I., Warren, A., Honushefsky, A., Cohain, A. T., Ledbetter, D. H., Sanfilippo, F., Sheridan, K., Rosica, D., Adonizio, C. S., Hwang, H. J., Lahouel, K., Cohen, J. D., Douville, C., Patel, A. A., Hagmann, L. N., Rolston, D. D., Malani, N., Zhou, S., Bettegowda, C., Diehl, D. L., Urban, B., Still, C. D., Kann, L., Woods, J. I., Salvati, Z. M., Vadakara, J., Leeming, R., Bhattacharya, P., Walter, C., Parker, A., Lengauer, C., Klein, A., Tomasetti, C., Fishman, E. K., Hruban, R. H., Kinzler, K. W., Vogelstein, B., & Papadopoulos, N.
Venue
Science
Published
2020-07-03
Volume
369
Issue
6499
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3020301997
Cited by
657
References
46
FWCI
27.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.