Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FTO mediates LINE1 m 6 A demethylation and chromatin regulation in mESCs and mouse development

Wei, Jiangbo, Yu, Xianbin, Yang, Lei, Liu, Xuelian, Gao, Boyang, Huang, Boxian, Dou, Xiaoyang, Liu, Jun, Zou, Zhongyu, Cui, Xiao-Long, Zhang, Li-Sheng, Zhao, Xingsen, Liu, Qinzhe, He, P. Cody, Sepich-Poore, Caraline, Zhong, Nicole, Liu, Wenqiang, Li, Yanhe, Kou, Xiaochen, Zhao, Yanhong, Wu, You, Cheng, Xuejun, Chen, Chuan, An, Yiming, Dong, Xueyang, Wang, Huanyu, Shu, Qiang, Hao, Ziyang, Duan, Tao, He, Yu-Ying, Li, Xuekun, Gao, Shaorong, Gao, Yawei, He, Chuan·2022·Science

Abstract

N 6 -methyladenosine (m 6 A) is the most abundant internal modification on mammalian messenger RNA. It is installed by a writer complex and can be reversed by erasers such as the fat mass and obesity-associated protein FTO. Despite extensive research, the primary physiological substrates of FTO in mammalian tissues and development remain elusive. Here, we show that FTO mediates m 6 A demethylation of long-interspersed element-1 (LINE1) RNA in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), regulating LINE1 RNA abundance and the local chromatin state, which in turn modulates the transcription of LINE1-containing genes. FTO-mediated LINE1 RNA m 6 A demethylation also plays regulatory roles in shaping chromatin state and gene expression during mouse oocyte and embryonic development. Our results suggest broad effects of LINE1 RNA m 6 A demethylation by FTO in mammals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abe9582

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.045 · DOI
  2. 10.1126/science.aau1646 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.04.025 · DOI
  4. 10.1242/dev.120.9.2601 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nature07848 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.11.017 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.03.006 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.04.017 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.12.026 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.04.001 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.09.032 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nature21022 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41589-019-0231-8 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.011 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.006 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.05.030 · DOI
  17. 10.1126/science.aav0080 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108038 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.stem.2014.09.019 · DOI
  20. 10.1126/science.aay6018 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/s41586-021-03313-9 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/s41586-021-03210-1 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1038/s41586-020-03135-1 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1038/ng.3945 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.043 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.02.048 · DOI
  27. 10.1126/science.1151710 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.001 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1038/s41593-017-0057-1 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41588-018-0060-9 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/j.ceb.2020.11.005 · DOI
  32. 10.1371/journal.pone.0014005 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/hmg/ddx128 · DOI
  34. J. Wuarin, U. Schibler, Physical isolation of nascent RNA chains transcribed by RNA polymerase II: Evidence for cotranscriptional splicing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 7219–7225 (1994). 7523861
  35. 10.1038/s41596-019-0159-1 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nmeth.2688 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1038/nmeth.3317 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1186/s12859-017-1808-4 · DOI
  41. 10.1186/1759-8753-5-13 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1093/nar/gkv007 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1038/nmeth.1923 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1093/nar/gkw257 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1186/s13059-020-1929-3 · DOI
  47. 10.1371/journal.pone.0065598 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/s41467-021-21758-4 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/s41422-019-0270-4 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.03.018 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/s41467-019-10669-0 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.014 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1038/s41467-021-21197-1 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/nature18606 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.stem.2018.05.020 · DOI
  56. 10.1093/dnares/dsy042 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wei, J., Yu, X., Yang, L., Liu, X., Gao, B., Huang, B., Dou, X., Liu, J., Zou, Z., Cui, X.-L., Zhang, L.-S., Zhao, X., Liu, Q., He, P. C., Sepich-Poore, C., Zhong, N., Liu, W., Li, Y., Kou, X., Zhao, Y., Wu, Y., Cheng, X., Chen, C., An, Y., Dong, X., Wang, H., Shu, Q., Hao, Z., Duan, T., He, Y.-Y., Li, X., Gao, S., Gao, Y., & He, C.
Venue
Science
Published
2022-05-27
Volume
376
Issue
6596
Pages
968-973
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
294
References
14
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review