Cited by 140EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Noninvasive brain-computer interface enables communication after brainstem stroke

Open access
Sellers, Eric W., Ryan, David B., Hauser, Christopher K.·2014·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

An individual “locked-in” by a brainstem stroke was able to communicate using noninvasive brain-computer interface technology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007801

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The emergence of interfaces based on evoked responses (P300, SSVEP) as the most efficient BCI solution for communication has promoted the use of machine learning because the margin for humans to learn to regulate evoked potentials is considered narrow.

    “On the one hand, the emergence of interfaces based on evoked responses (P300, steady-state visually evoked potentials [SSVEP]) as the most efficient BCI solution for communication [13–16] has promoted the use of machine learning because the margin for humans to learn to regulate evoked potentials is considered to be narrow.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [19]Benton AL Hamsher KS Varney NK Spreen O Contribution to Neuropsychological Assessment Oxford University Press New York 1983
  2. [23]Fry EB Kerss JE The Reading Teachers Book of Lists Wiley San Francisco, CA 4 2000
  3. [24]Draper NR Smith H Applied Regression Analysis, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics Wiley New York 2 1981

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sellers, E. W., Ryan, D. B., & Hauser, C. K.
Affiliations
East Tennessee State University (US)
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2014-10-08
Volume
6
Issue
257
Pages
257re7-257re7
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W2122424463
Cited by
140
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R33DC010470)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (EB 00856, R01EB000856)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
brain-computer interface, brainstem infarction, locked-in syndrome, P300 event-related potential, communication aids, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, assistive technology, neurodegenerative diseases
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Communication Devices for People with Disabilities, Electroencephalography, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Quadriplegia, Task Performance and Analysis, Event-Related Potentials, P300, Brain Stem Infarctions, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Translational Research, Biomedical, Brain-Computer Interfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review