Cited by 68Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen ControlFungal Infections and Studies

Activity of a Long-Acting Echinocandin, Rezafungin, and Comparator Antifungal Agents Tested against Contemporary Invasive Fungal Isolates (SENTRY Program, 2016 to 2018)

Open access
Pfaller, Michael A., Carvalhaes, Cecilia, Messer, Shawn A., Rhomberg, Paul R., Castanheira, Mariana·2020·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

We evaluated the activity of rezafungin and comparators, using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution methods, against a worldwide collection of 2,205 invasive fungal isolates recovered from 2016 to 2018. Candida ( n = 1,904 isolates; 6 species), Cryptococcus neoformans ( n = 73), Aspergillus fumigatus ( n = 183), and Aspergillus flavus ( n = 45) isolates were tested for their susceptibility (S) to rezafungin as well as the comparators caspofungin, anidulafungin, micafungin, and azoles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.00099-20

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Rhomberg PR, Schaefer BA, Castanheira M 2018 Activity of a long-acting echinocandin rezafungin and comparator antifungal agents tested against contemporary invasive fungal isolates: SENTRY 2018, poster 2400. IDWeek, San Francisco, CA. PMC7179261 32015043

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfaller, M. A., Carvalhaes, C., Messer, S. A., Rhomberg, P. R., & Castanheira, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • JMI Laboratories (US)
Corresponding author
Carvalhaes, Cecilia
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2020-03-24
Volume
64
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W3004193413
Cited by
68
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Cidara Therapeutics
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
rezafungin, echinocandins, invasive fungal infections, antifungal susceptibility, Candida, Cryptococcus neoformans, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus, caspofungin, anidulafungin, micafungin, azoles
MeSH terms
Caspofungin, Micafungin, Anidulafungin, Antifungal Agents, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Azoles, Candida, Cryptococcus neoformans, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Echinocandins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review